Sign Up
You are not currently logged in. Please log in to CEUfast to enable the course progress and auto resume features.

Course Library

Bullying: Real-life strategies to reduce the frequency and impact of bullying in healthcare

1 Contact Hour
Listen to Audio
CEUfast OwlGet one year unlimited nursing CEUs $39Sign up now
This peer reviewed course is applicable for the following professions:
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), Athletic Trainer (AT/AL), Certified Nurse Midwife, Certified Nurse Practitioner, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), Home Health Aid (HHA), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN), Medical Assistant (MA), Midwife (MW), Nursing Student, Occupational Therapist (OT), Occupational Therapist Assistant (OTA), Other, Physical Therapist (PT), Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), Registered Nurse (RN), Registered Nurse Practitioner, Respiratory Care Practitioner, Respiratory Therapist (RT)
This course will be updated or discontinued on or before Friday, June 14, 2024

Nationally Accredited

CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.

CEUFast, Inc. is an AOTA Provider of professional development, Course approval ID#05100. This distant learning-independent format is offered at 0.1 CEUs Intermediate, Categories: Professional Issues. AOTA does not endorse specific course content, products, or clinical procedures. AOTA provider number 9757.

CEUFast, Inc. (BOC AP#: P10067) is approved by the Board of Certification, Inc. to provide education to Athletic Trainers (ATs).

FPTA Approval: CE24-614889. Accreditation of this course does not necessarily imply the FPTA supports the views of the presenter or the sponsors.

≥92% of participants will know how to identify and respond appropriately to bullying behavior in their work environment.


After completing this course, the learner will be able to

  1. Define in a practical manner bullying, workplace violence, incivility, and related terms.
  2. Analyze plausible departmental resources for bullying, such as human resources, employee wellness, and management.
  3. Identify ways to improve resiliency against bullying.
  4. Evaluate how communication styles prevent bullying from escalating.
  5. Outline the effects of cognitive rehearsal against bullying.
CEUFast Inc. and the course planners for this educational activity do not have any relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

Last Updated:
  • 0% complete
Hide Outline
Playback Speed

Narrator Preference

(Automatically scroll to related sections.)
Bullying: Real-life strategies to reduce the frequency and impact of bullying in healthcare
To earn of certificate of completion you have one of two options:
  1. Take test and pass with a score of at least 80%
  2. Reflect on practice impact by completing self-reflection, self-assessment and course evaluation.
    (NOTE: Some approval agencies and organizations require you to take a test and self reflection is NOT an option.)
Author:    Nick Angelis (CRNA, MSN)

Definitions and Prevalence

Healthcare is stressful, even when effective teamwork and interdisciplinary communication are in place. Bullying behaviors may be challenging to detect initially, and managers should not overreact. However, bullying in healthcare is an increasingly prevalent issue. It can include repeated and deliberate, health-harming mistreatment ranging from verbal abuse and humiliation to threats, sabotage, or worse (Strube, 2016). As evidenced by a case in which an anesthesiologist insulted her sedated patient, the media can make headline news out of events that otherwise only garner interest in the break room or hospital cafeteria (Greenberg, 2015).

The term “bullying” conjures images of getting beat up at recess or picked on during gym class. Synonyms in the corporate world include incivility and lateral or horizontal violence. Aggression and violence from patients and visitors are a real threat, but healthcare professionals report hostility from their fellow professionals as a greater concern. This hostility occurs more frequently than sexual harassment or discrimination (Strube, 2016). Physical violence is rarely part of horizontal violence, typically bullying from someone with comparable authority. Intimidation, withholding clinical information or assistance, undermining, harassment, and constant criticism are signs of bullying and disruptive behavior (The Joint Commission, 2021).

Bullying is not always verbal. Attacks delivered via task assignment or exclusion to erode professional competence and reputation are also forms of bullying. A bullying interaction involves repeated negative and unreasonable behaviors. It is a form of relational aggression intended to offend and cause distress in the recipient. The target experiences damage and realizes they are being bullied. Many of these interactions involve an imbalance of power, though that power may be social and informal. For example, the “Supernurse” pretending to critique but actually humiliating his colleagues, or the catty respiratory therapist bullying by not inviting some of her coworkers to department events (Edmonson and Zelonka, 2019).

Nurses struggle with bullying more than other health professionals, and among new nurses, 60% leave their first job due to bullying from coworkers. An equal percentage of managers and executives also experience workplace bullying (Edmonson and Zelonka, 2019). The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing mental health issues and led to increased initial diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in healthcare professionals (Harrison, 2022). Subsequent shortages and the cost to train new staff continue a stressful cycle worsened by bullying.

At Risk Populations

Similar to the experience of novice employees, students and educators face a high potential for bullying. Office or hospital staff may view faculty as lacking practical clinical skills, while students have limited rights and access to resources. If they feel entitled to better grades, students may bully professors. Although it is not as common, veteran nurses and physicians report bullying from newer nurses. Thus, bullying is sometimes complex and nuanced rather than intentional. Often, it is not easily remedied by punitive policies directed against a clear aggressor. Defining the behaviors that will not be tolerated is essential to “make the charges stick.” Senior faculty and administrators are more likely to be bullies, and these behaviors are perpetuated if the classroom or department is led by intimidation and fear. Executives from accounting and other disciplines often bully healthcare leaders in their organizations (Edmonson and Zelonka, 2019).

Evidence of bullying and incivility in the nursing profession is well documented. Documentation of this in nurse anesthesia and similar literature about advanced nursing practice, physical therapists, and physician assistants is lacking. These practitioners often find themselves “caught in the middle” and bullied by physicians and the nurses with whom they must work closely. The implications of such acts can cause physical, emotional, and psychological distress within and among practitioners—and potentially toward the patients under their care. Healthcare providers and facilities are becoming increasingly dependent on outcomes and quality of care for reimbursement. Healthcare professionals are an essential component of both of these.

Maintaining a positive work and learning environment may prevent distress among students and healthcare professionals and improve quality care. Students are especially vulnerable for multiple reasons, including the possibility that evaluations will suffer if they stand up for themselves or others. Giving target resources and holding bullies accountable is only part of the puzzle–bystanders must be empowered to share what they see (Edmonson and Zelonka, 2019). Underreporting of these activities occurs in certain circumstances due to a lack of confidence in the institution to take action. Others may choose not to report bullying out of fear of retaliation, seeming petty, or the fear of becoming the target of more abuse if acting as a whistleblower (The Joint Commission, 2021).

Bullying needs to be explored with those it affects to more fully understand its impact and develop methods to prevent, discuss, and deal with bullying situations as they arise. Often, healthcare institutions fail to act on issues of incivility and have limited measures to address them. Rather than ensuring executives are modeling healthy leadership and not accommodating anyone who will not stop bullying, institutions might not admit a problem and fail to address situations quickly and firmly. The result is an environment without the respect needed for healthcare professionals to address issues and hold each other accountable (Edmonson and Zelonka, 2019).

Effects on the Target

A healthcare professional being bullied won’t function at peak physical and mental health and may even question their ability to perform effectively. They must become aware of their surroundings and the internal and external resources available should they find themselves or a coworker becoming a bullying target. Mental health assistance may start with an employee wellness line but should also include therapy and psychiatry. Targets of bullying behavior can cause weight fluctuation, hypertension and angina, pain, headaches, and many psychological effects—from fatigue and anxiety to post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidal thoughts (Edmonson and Zelonka, 2019).

Employees and students may respond to negative feedback by letting it positively affect their practice, or they may withdraw and deflect it to protect themselves from introspection and acknowledge the possibility of failure. The effects of bullying are highly individualized and partly depend on the targets' communication skills and emotional intelligence. In this context, emotional intelligence refers to correctly assessing, monitoring, and perceiving one’s own emotions and the feelings of those around them to make decisions better and reach goals. Self-control and clear thinking during tense situations reflect high emotional intelligence, but this is affected by shared emotions and subsequent behaviors in workplace culture. Peer behaviors heavily influence ethics and decisions, but self-monitoring and political skills decrease the incidence of bullying due to empathy more than social capabilities. Leadership is essential to emotional intelligence because someone who cares little for others but possesses high emotional intelligence can bully and manipulate them covertly. Effective leadership is proven to improve communication and reduce clinical errors (Wahr, 2021)

In part, because bullying is often random, many studies don’t find common variables in bullied healthcare professionals. However, demanding jobs with little control and social support correlate highly with bullying. Healthcare professionals look to their peers for help and direction. Autonomy is an important weapon in fighting bullying. A stifling environment challenges communication and leads to errors that may result in a healthcare professional appearing less competent (Wahr, 2021). A common thread is a negative affectivity that causes more distress and nervousness than warranted by a situation. Negative affectivity is a personality variable that expresses the experience of negative emotions and poor self-concept. Negative affectivity produces a variety of negative emotions, including anger, contempt, disgust, guilt, and fear. Support systems at work (for example, fellow nurses) or family and friends (for the lone secretary in a unit) are crucial to building resilience (Staub, 2016).

Cost of Bullying

Some evidence postulates that personality traits such as conscientiousness lead to repeatedly bullying employees despite job and career changes. People affected by a mental disorder caused by stress are often eligible for compensation. Bullying behavior leading to mental harm may qualify, and as performance decreases, work-related injuries increase. The benefits versus the costs associated with employers taking a proactive approach to bullying are 2:1. Ignoring behavior is expensive and can affect teamwork among staff ranging from housekeeping to attending physicians. Indirect victims may become an issue. In healthcare, this compromises patients’ safety: patients are already vulnerable. Distraction harms patients (Namie, 2014; Wahr, 2021)

Attempts to quantify patient harm resulting from bullying reveal startling results. Rather than delays in procuring juice and saltines, studies show that bullying leads to increased patient mortality, wrong site, and wrong patient surgery, foreign objects left in surgical wounds, and multiple medication and protocol errors (Wahr, 2021).

The work environment correlates to all patient satisfaction measures. The risk of patient death decreases in a positive work environment and can impact job satisfaction even more than financial compensation. Many managers would agree that bullying is wrong, but they do not realize that it has tangible costs to their workforce; $11,581 per nurse per year, to be more precise (Edmonson and Zelonka, 2019).


The Joint Commission (2021) issued a Sentinel Event Alert to emphasize that rude, disruptive behavior among healthcare professionals can pose a serious threat to patient safety and overall quality of care. The commission suggested that all accredited programs take action. One recommendation is that all accredited healthcare organizations create behavioral codes of conduct and establish a formal process for managing unacceptable behavior. These codes of conduct should focus on respect, with a zero-tolerance for intimidating behavior and a means to alleviate fear and retribution among those who report disruptive behavior.

Because bullying is complex and skilled perpetrators use the very rules against bullying to intimidate others, zero-tolerance policies are not always effective. Effective policing requires transformational or congruent leadership rather than the more common transactional leadership. Improved productivity is the goal of transactional leadership, even if nurses are lured into working harder and longer in exchange for bonuses or overtime pay. Transformational leadership is the most effective leadership approach to improve workplace culture since it is flexible and fine-tuned to the emotions of others. Congruent leadership fosters collaboration and the ability to resolve tense situations and people diplomatically (Mohiuddin, 2017).

For an example of bullying policies in their specialty of nurse anesthesia, the authors turned to Strube (2016). He writes:

Anesthesia providers set high standards and expectations for themselves and others. The CRNA must expect and demand excellent behavior across all environments. The healthcare system should strive to maintain a healthy, positive, and safe environment for all staff, students, and employees. It is important to promote a social climate with social norms free of lateral violence, bullying activity, harassment, and intimidation. The healthcare community must subscribe to the philosophy that lateral violence or bullying in any fashion constitutes unacceptable behavior.

In 2000, the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists issued a practice statement promoting safe, healthy work environments. Developing a strong educational program requires training staff members to identify lateral violence and educate them about proper interventions and techniques to deal with it. Strube’s (2016) capstone educational module was designed to be integrated as a functional tool to address bullying and correlate with the sentinel event alert from The Joint Commission (2021).

Tools for the Target

Bullying in the workplace can lead to physical, mental, social, and financial stress for the target. How does one pick up the pieces and move forward after a bullying event? Targets of bullying behavior are not “victims” because they can change their situation with education and resources that promote healing and wellness. Deciding to change their situation does not mean they have easy choices. Many targets find themselves self-blaming when they do nothing to provoke inappropriate behavior and abuse. This self-blame can often trap targets, preventing them from taking steps to end the psychological violence. It can spiral into self-destruction as the target’s self-confidence destroys itself. When self-confidence is lost, the target starts to believe the bully’s lies and becomes more vulnerable to the situation and the bully (Namie, 2014).

Fear and anxiety worsen the effects of bullying. Leaders must create a culture of authenticity where healthcare professionals can be themselves. Vulnerability by choice allows work relationships to form cohesive teams, increases morale, and better behavior by everyone (Ostermeier et al., 2020). The first steps in responding to bullying are awareness and avoidance of self-blame. Once the self-blame ends, targets can focus on healing and relational authenticity. Common resources to help regain confidence and have faith in the journey ahead include support such as family, close friends, and colleagues; professional therapists and counselors; legal attorneys specializing in employment law; and organizations such as BEHAVE Wellness (Bully Elimination, Health, Advocacy, Violence Education) (Namie, 2014; Ostermeier et al., 2020).

Workplace employee wellness and human resources departments may not always be beneficial places of support for bullied nurses. Oppressive work culture will extend past the barriers of a nursing floor or unit. Concerns about reporting systems, privacy, and equitable treatment are valid, especially if the bully is in management. In some cases, wellness programs sponsored by employers can increase job performance while decreasing compassion fatigue and stress. Although the authors own a wellness program, programming corporate happiness for employees is far from a complete fix for bullying issues (Begley, 2015).

The demand for pharmacists, nurses, and other providers is cyclical, and bullying has ebbed and flowed through the decades. Hospitals that retain and recruit employees are conducive to high autonomy and employee leadership. In its absence, some institutions have turned to wellness models that penalize and pass healthcare costs to the employee rather than helping with bullying or any other problems affecting the health of healthcare professionals. Although wellness programs are better known for granting rewards for healthy behaviors, as they evolve amidst cost-cutting measures, the result can be corporate bullying and lower morale (Begley, 2015).

A bullying target’s path to recovery and wellness is highly individualized. Happiness is an internal feeling, and to find happiness, it must first be defined. According to Dr. Amit Sood (2015), chairman of Mayo Clinic’s Mind-Body Medicine Initiative, the key to happiness is a healthier way of thinking with our brains. Gratitude practices can bring a sense of contentment, place things in perspective, and create inner happiness. Sood developed the SMART Program, which addresses emotional resilience through “interpretations.” Each day of the week, targets interpret what gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, forgiveness, celebration, and reflection/prayer mean to them.

Other wellness activities may include journaling, meditation or prayer, yoga, exercise, volunteer activities, eating healthy and personal hobbies. Above all, when confronted with workplace bullying, health and well-being need to come first. Maintaining wellness is of paramount importance. Targets should ask themselves what they like to do to unwind and relax. What are they grateful for? How do they show compassion to themselves and others? The answers to these questions will help keep nurses grounded by providing a sense of happiness and comfort when coping with this tragedy.

Increasing Resiliency

Those feeling the effects of bullying often need to start a path to wellness with basic, practical steps. The various advantages and disadvantages of antidepressants and similar drugs to combat bullying are beyond the scope of this article. Still, targets must have the right attitude and take a holistic approach. Rather than a “take this pill and don’t worry about it” mentality, subtle yet ongoing lifestyle changes should be included in any intervention to minimize the destructive effects of bullying. For example, exercising at the appropriate duration and intensity for the target’s fitness level (and how well they are eating and sleeping) reduces and normalizes cortisol levels, making it easier to lose weight, relax, and deal with stress. Without exercise, employees can create a vicious cycle by covering up low energy with coffee or sugar, which stresses the adrenal glands. Low energy is common due to the odd hours many healthcare professionals must work, in addition to overtime and call shifts. Sleep deprivation also creates abnormal cortisol and other hormone levels that help the body deal with stress (Angelis, 2016; Vargas and Lopez-Duran, 2014).

Avoiding computer screens and other potential disruptors of circadian rhythms before bed also improves nurse wellness. Learning healthy methods to unwind and relax lessens the risks of alcohol and drug abuse as coping mechanisms. Healthy eating plays a significant role; magnesium is calming and works well as a sleep aid. Topical absorption through an Epsom salt bath or increasing magnesium intake through diet and supplements can reduce stress (Angelis, 2016).

Stress is directly related to physical health. Emotional intelligence is key. Barbasio and Granieri (2014) tested women with autoimmune diseases to determine whether their symptoms and vulnerability to the disease were related to emotional connectedness and control. They were asked about emotional attachment and the ability to understand and describe their attitudes and emotions. Not surprisingly, the surveyed women tested highly for unresolved emotional issues and difficulty understanding and controlling their feelings. The inability to recognize and fully experience their own emotions seemed to be a defensive way to avoid painful memories. Besides impeding their clinical progress, this detachment also affected their abilities to meaningfully attach to others and communicate effectively (Barbasio and Granieri, 2014; Angelis, 2016).

The explanation is that distraction and worry have consequences that may not surface until the added stress of workplace bullying occurs. Another useful practice for healthcare workers in toxic environments is mindfulness. A study group meditated (practiced mindfulness), while the control group did not (Kaliman et al., 2014). Mindfulness is the opposite of checking texts and caring for patients while finishing this continuing education article. Instead, it is a purposeful, calming focus on the present—on current feelings rather than plans for the future or influences from the past. After 8 hours, the meditators showed a range of genetic and molecular differences, including altered levels of gene-regulating laboratory values and reduced pro-inflammatory genes, which correlated with faster physical recovery from a stressful situation. The genes included cortisol secretors and cyclooxygenase inhibitors, which play a pivotal role in stress and inflammation. These differences were not present in pre-study testing, so it’s safe to say the changes were due to the differences in how the two groups spent their 8 hours of quiet activity (Kaliman et al., 2014; Meng and Koh, 2016).

Immediate Responses

Although knowledge can slowly transform a work culture, the immediacy of individual incidences makes application difficult. One solution is role-playing, similar to practicing for a code or fire. Cognitive rehearsal teaches predetermined responses to common bullying scenarios and attenuates bullying (Meng and Koh, 2016). Techniques emphasize learned, specific responses through listening or reading instruction. When confronted with an aggressive coworker, healthcare professionals process information through elicited scripted responses previously taught (Meng and Koh, 2016).

Preparing responses to bullying has merit beyond the common response of, “Now I know what I should have told them, but it’s a day later.” Silence by others during bullying (sometimes called second-hand bullying) may be unethical, and anti-bullying education and protocols are not always effective. Potential bullying scenarios are easily imagined because incivility often follows the healthcare hierarchy: physicians and administrators bully clinical professionals, who bully paraprofessionals such as certified nursing assistants. Last in line are the housekeepers and similar support staff (Fink-Samnick, 2016; Fink-Samnick, 2017). Rather than a collaborative model of care, the education of nurses, physicians, and other professionals fails to teach how to communicate and cope effectively in clinical practice. This lack of education leads to several distinct kinds of bullies being profiled via cognitive rehearsal by healthcare professionals. The elitist, the envious, the resentful, the cliquish who bullies through exclusion, the backstabber who seeks friendship before betraying staff members, and the rumor mill who spreads negativity while taking offense whenever possible (Meng and Koh, 2016; Fink-Samnick, 2016).

Combining emotional intelligence with cognitive rehearsal is especially vital when targets are bullied by supervisors. Rather than authentic or collaborative leaders who practice what they preach, bullying leaders use personal information as ammunition and try to ensure their subordinates are not building a case against them. Healthcare professionals must focus on self-care and resist the urge to isolate themselves, especially from potential allies. Excusing themselves from bullying situations or even distracting the bully with a physical object (such as an envelope or file, not a heavy paperweight) are also methods to transform from target to “workplace warrior” (Fink-Samnick, 2016).

Case Study

Scenario/situation/patient description

Dana, a female respiratory therapist, began her first week at a new hospital. On the second day, she was confronted by Adam, a male colleague, who asked, “Are you sure you are still single?” “Huh?” responded Dana, taken by surprise by the question. Adam placed an arm around her shoulder and replied, “I saw you on Facebook snuggled up close with a good-looking man.” Feeling uncomfortable knowing he had searched her social media account and not knowing what to say, Dana told Adam it was none of his business.


What indicators are present?

  • Dana’s initial response of “Huh”? She was taken by surprise at his prying for intimate information about her.
  • The asking of inappropriate questions to someone new to the department that he had just met. The preemptive searching into her personal life before working with her indicates him prejudging her. Is there reasonable cause to suspect abuse or maltreatment? Yes. What are your next steps?
  • Report this inappropriate questioning and social media searching to her supervisor. Coworkers may be able to give insight into his behavior, but spreading the story is not a good idea.
  • If Adam asks her an uncomfortable question regarding her personal life again, Dana has prepared with cognitive rehearsal. She will respond by ignoring Adam and documenting and reporting his continued behavior.

Discussion of outcomes

Recognizing, identifying, documenting, and reporting Adam’s inappropriate questioning during their initial encounter was important to nip this behavior in the bud and hopefully prevent Dana from continuing to be a target for further bullying/abuse by Adam.

Strength and weaknesses

If Dana did not tell Adam to mind his own business and did not identify, document, and report the initial bullying, the abuse would have remained unreported and probably would continue to occur, creating an uncomfortable workplace for her.

Welcoming Culture Needed

Bullying is pervasive in healthcare, but it must be identified before addressing it. Promoting a welcoming culture with clear communication skills and consequences for bullying behavior is an excellent place to start. As healthcare professionals take ownership of their health and workplace culture, they become a powerful force for decreasing bullying and supporting targets. The result is a happier and healthier staff, decreased costs, and improved patient safety and experience.

Select one of the following methods to complete this course.

Take TestPass an exam testing your knowledge of the course material.
No TestDescribe how this course will impact your practice.

Implicit Bias Statement

CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.


  • Strube P. (2016). Fixing lateral violence through positive behavior education. DNP Capstone Project. Rosalind Franklin University.
  • Greenberg, A. (2015, June 24). Anesthetized patient accidentally records doctors insulting him during surgery. Visit Source.
  • The Joint Commission (2021). Sentinel Event Alert 40. Behaviors that undermine a culture of safetyVisit Source.
  • Edmonson, C., & Zelonka, C. (2019). Our own worst enemies. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 274–279. Visit Source.
  • Wahr, J. A. (2021, March). Safety in the Operating Room. UpToDate. Retrieved April 23, 2022. Visit Source.
  • Harrison, R. (2022, January). COVID-19: Occupational Health Issues for Health Care Personnel. UpToDate. Retrieved April 23, 2022. Visit Source.
  • Mohiuddin, S. S. (2017). The Transactional and Transformational Approaches to Leadership in Corporate Sector. International Journal of Science and Research.
  • Namie G. (2014, April). The Bully at Work. Presentation given at Workplace Bullying Institute Training, Bellingham, Wash.
  • Ostermeier, K., Medina-Craven, M. N., Camp, K. M., & Davis, S. E. (2020). Can I be me with you at work? Examining relational authenticity and discretionary behaviors in the workplace. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(2), 316–345. Visit Source.
  • Begley S. (2015). Coming soon to a workplace near you: “wellness or else.” Visit Source.
  • Sood, A. (2013). SMART Program (Summary Sheet). In: The Mayo Clinic Guide to Stress-Free Living. Rochester, Min.: DaCapo Life Long Books. Or Sood, A. (2015, May). The key to contentment. Rochester Magazine. 25-28.
  • Angelis M. (2016). Real Exercise. In: A Natural Path to Wellness. Pensacola, Fla.: Indigo River; 100-101.
  • Vargas I., & Lopez-Duran N. (2014). Dissecting the impact of sleep and stress on the cortisol awakening response in young adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 40:10-16.
  • Barbasio C., & Granieri A. (2014). Emotion regulation and mental representation of attachment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Nerv Ment Dis. 201(4):304-310.
  • Angelis M. (2016). Therapy for Wellness. In: A Natural Path to Wellness. Pensacola, Fla.: Indigo River; 157-158.
  • Kaliman P., et al. (2014). Rapid changes in histone deacetylases and inflammatory gene expression in expert meditators. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 40:96-107.
  • Meng, W., & Koh, S. (2016). Management of work place bullying in hospital: A review of the use of cognitive rehearsal as an alternative management strategy. Int J Sci. 3:213-222.
  • Fink-Samnick, E. (2016). The new age of bullying and violence in health care: Part 2: Advancing Professional Education, Practice Culture, and Advocacy. Prof Case Manage. 21(3):114-126.
  • Fink-Samnick, E. (2017). The new age of bullying and violence in health care: Part 3. Professional Case Management, 22(6), 260–274. Visit Source.