≥ 92% of participants will know key differences between wounds and specific types of wounds, where the goal is symptom management versus total healing.
CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.
CEUFast, Inc. is an AOTA Provider of professional development, Course approval ID#4604. This distant learning-independent format is offered at 0.15 CEUs Intermediate, Categories: OT Service Delivery and Foundational Knowledge AOTA does not endorse specific course content, products, or clinical procedures. AOTA provider number 9757.
≥ 92% of participants will know key differences between wounds and specific types of wounds, where the goal is symptom management versus total healing.
After completing this continuing education course, the participant will be able to meet the following objectives:
When an individual exhibits a wound (injury, surgical incision, etc.), the treatment goals typically include complete wound closure and healing. Furthermore, the healing trajectory is anticipated to follow established pathways or phases: Hemostasis, Inflammation, Proliferation, and (in full-thickness wounds) Scar Maturation or Remodeling. However, in complex and chronic wounds such as many diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure ulcers, where healing is delayed, this expected pathway is interrupted, and wounds may get "stuck" in a chronic inflammatory state (please see more complete descriptions of these phases in Bohn & Bryant, 2023 or courses that are part of the CEUFAST, Inc. Wound Series) (Bryant & Nix, 2023). Nevertheless, even in these chronic wounds, the treatment goal is typically complete closure and healing or resolution of the wound.
What about wounds we do not expect to heal or where complete closure or resolution is not an option? Wounds such as non-operable malignant tumors protruding from the body of individuals with a terminal illness, non-healing wounds due to arterial insufficiency where surgical revascularization is not an option because of severe comorbid conditions, or pressure ulcers at the end of life due to skin failure (often called Kennedy Terminal Ulcers)? What should the treatment outcome goals be in these wounds? These are types of wounds where the primary goal becomes targeted symptom management versus complete wound healing. Many (but not all) of these palliative or terminal wounds are due to cancer.
Increasing numbers of individuals (including infants, children, and adults) are being cared for within palliative or hospice care settings. It has been suggested these
According to the Skin Cancer Foundation (2024), “more people are diagnosed with skin cancer each year in the U.S. than all other cancers combined.” Here are selected facts from their website:
Using fictitious case scenarios built from the author's clinical experiences with actual patients, this course will focus on palliative wound care measures and wound treatment options where the desired wound management goal is something other than complete resolution or closure of the wound. Specifically, this course will provide treatment considerations and potential options to prevent or minimize wound enlargement or periwound skin breakdown and target specific common symptoms such as decreasing unpleasant odors associated with the wound, managing wound-related moisture, addressing wound pain, considerations of how to help the patient aesthetically (to minimize their feelings of social isolation and improve quality of life), and other helpful management tips regarding some of these challenging wounds. The photos in this course were taken from the internet because of the similarity in appearance to what could be seen in the case scenarios (no images or clinical information were taken from the author's clinical case files to protect patient privacy).
Mr. Smith is a 62-year-old male with a protruding 6cm irregularly round-shaped tumor on his left cheek, which is inoperable. His comorbid medical conditions include diabetes mellitus type II (DMII), hypertension, obesity, and malignant melanoma of the right cheek (with systemic metastasis to other organs). Although this scenario is a fictitious patient, the photo below represents what his tumor may have looked like before opening up as a fistula at the inferior border (at 4 o'clock) on the image - involving the mucous membrane of the mouth.
Image of tumor
Photo source: intranet.tdmu.edu.ua
Laboratory values: Hemoglobin (Hgb) 11.1 / Hematocrit (Hct) 42.0; White blood cells (WBC) 9.8; Electrolytes were all within normal ranges. Hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) 6.9; Fasting blood sugar 135.
Mr. Smith's medications: Metformin 500 mg (milligrams) orally twice a day, a baby aspirin (81 mg) orally once daily, atenolol 50 mg orally once daily, and a multivitamin once daily. He reports taking acetaminophen 500 mg orally every 4 to 6 hours as needed.
Pertinent social information: Mr. Smith had a girlfriend he lived with for more than ten years, but she left him after his cancer diagnosis, saying she "could not stay around to watch him die." He lives at home alone and is a Veteran with a history of having served two tours of combat duty. He also reports having several guns at home. Nothing is known about any history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and the patient states he has not received care at his local VA, saying only that he "has closed that chapter of his life." He currently has home care nurses who visit him daily for wound care; otherwise, he cares for his wound himself. Home care is recommending hospice. It is estimated that approximately 30% of patients admitted to hospice have a cancer diagnosis. The life expectancy of patients with fungating cancerous wounds is reported to be 6-12 months (Furka et al., 2022; Vardham et al., 2019). Mr. Smith has had only one social visitor from his local church, but the patient asked them not to come back. When asked, "Why?" he said he was embarrassed by the wound odor, appearance, and amount of drainage he had to deal with during the visit. He has not left his house except for doctor's office visits and grocery shopping at a 24-hour grocery after midnight to minimize how many people see him.
Other clinical information and wound description: Mr. Smith weighs 175 lbs (he has lost 45 pounds over the past six months). His height is 5' 10"; his vital signs (blood pressure or BP, pulse, respiration, and temperature) are unremarkable. The patient complains of pain at the tumor site and inside of their mouth near the tumor site. He reports his pain level is an "8" on a scale of 1 to 10, which is constant and "achy" most of the time, but occasionally he experiences a sharp jabbing sensation.
The physical exam also demonstrated that Mr. Smith would not often make eye contact and was holding a folded towel against his right cheek near the tumor for exudate control. The tumor is protruding from his right cheek, approximately 3.0cm at the apex of the tumor. The size of the overall tumor/lesion is 6.0cm at the longest axis x 4.0cm at the broadest axis and is irregularly shaped with periwound redness, irritation, and erosion at the inferior border around the 4 o'clock position (using the body as a clock, think of the head always at 12 o'clock and the feet at 6 o'clock). This area now has a small open wound, which has been defined as a fistula tracking to and involving the mucous membrane of the mouth, currently draining copious amounts of clear to brownish liquid (slight sour odor from exudate). Mr. Smith also complains that it feels "raw" (very painful to touch) at the inferior border. Chewing on that side increases pain sharply ("up to a 10" on a pain scale of 1 to 10), and cold compresses seem to provide minimal and temporary relief (pain level is "3 or 4" on a scale of 1 to 10 when he has the most relief).
In some patients with advanced cancer, a tumor may protrude through the skin, which may or may not be operable. Some studies suggest that 5 to 19% of all patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasm will develop a metastatic cancerous skin lesion (Bauer, 2022; Emmons & Dale, 2022). Many metastatic breast cancers may result in cutaneous wounds on the breast/chest. Metastatic cutaneous lesions may be ulcerous (tend to look like craters) or fungating.
|
Mr. Smith should also be encouraged to participate in regular phone follow-up calls with a healthcare provider team at his local VA and perhaps consider getting involved in a support group for terminal cancer patients near him. His local church or some Veteran's groups may be a potential support source if the patient allows them. If his clinical wound treatment plan included measures to help him feel less uncomfortable about his wound/tumor with visitors, this might help increase social support for this Veteran. If the patient does express any suicide ideations, it should be considered a medical emergency, with prompt intervention as warranted (e.g., call 911, do not leave the patient alone, and remove any means of self-harm such as guns or pills if at all possible) (Carroll et al., 2020).
Mr. Simpson is a 74-year-old man with a history of Type II Diabetes Mellitus and arterial insufficiency to the right lower extremity. He also has an active diagnosis of congestive heart failure, for which the last hospitalization for CHF was over eight months ago, peripheral vascular disease, as well as a history of a stroke two years ago with some slight residual left-sided weakness. He had previously experienced a left lower leg (below the knee) amputation for arterial insufficiency three years ago. He most recently experienced a right great toe amputation for a recurrent diabetic foot ulcer to the right foot, first metatarsal head, and osteomyelitis 12 weeks ago. He now presents with non-healing wounds to his right foot and dry gangrene to his right 4th toe secondary to arterial insufficiency. Surgical revascularization is not an option because of his severe comorbid conditions.
Other relevant social and medical information:
Mr. Simpson has lived in a long-term care facility for the last eight months, with no plans to return to independent living, and has no living family. He is a widower of 20 years without any children. He is a smoker, having smoked 1.5 packs per day for over 30 years. He is currently limited to smoking only outside, at the long-term care facility, when he can be taken out to the porch by a staff member, which occurs approximately once a day. He has had no visitors in the past eight months, and his affect is rather flat, although he brightens up when he talks about his wife and some of their trips abroad. Laboratory values and medications have remained stable and unremarkable for the last six months. His medications include daily oral Warfarin, with bi-weekly to monthly Prothrombin Time and International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) blood tests being drawn, which have remained in a therapeutic range for the past four months.
Mr. Simpson's left lower leg amputation stump is well-matured with no skin breakdown. He does have a prosthesis but has not used it since he spends most of his time in a chair or wheelchair. Mr. Simpson's skin is very dry, with only fair skin turgor. His right great toe amputation site still has a linear 3cm long x 0.5cm wide wound at the old incision site with pink, slightly hypergranulating tissue noted and some slight maceration to the inferior border up to 0.5cm away from wound edges. Only scant yellow/serous exudate is noted on the dry gauze dressing over this area. A small 0.7cm round dry, the scabbed area is noted to the inside aspect of his 2nd toe proximal to the foot. The interdigit spaces appear dry and intact, but the tip of the 4th toe is black and shriveled with dry gangrene. No exudate is noted from the 2nd toe nor the 4th toe. He has some moist callous noted to the lateral aspect of the right foot just below the 5th toe. He denies any wound pain or pain in the foot.
Image of dry gangrene
Photo Source: wikimedia.org
Pathophysiology of non-healing arterial ulcers and dry gangrene:
As could be surmised from the term "arterial insufficiency" or "arterial ulcer," these skin lesions
Due to significantly reduced blood supply, gangrene is the term for tissue necrosis (irreversible death). Gangrene may occur due to injury, complications of diabetes, arterial insufficiency, infection, or other health conditions. Gangrene is classified as dry, wet, and gas gangrene. In dry gangrene, it is desirable to keep it dry (not to ever apply moist dressings over this), as it may progress to
In wet and gas gangrene, surgical amputation is usually performed to prevent the progression and spread of infection to other tissues or sepsis.
When evaluating the scientific evidence supporting specific practices detailed in a practice guideline, one should look at the quantity of the evidence, the quality of the evidence, and the potential benefit or effectiveness versus harm of any recommended practice change. The WOCN has published the tables below about their WOCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (Bonham et al., 2022). |
Evidence | Criteria |
---|---|
Level I | An RCT demonstrating a statistically significant difference in at least one important outcome defined by P < .05. Level I trials can conclude the difference is not statistically significant if the sample size is adequate to exclude a 25% difference among study arms with 80% power. |
Level II | An RCT, not meeting level I criteria. |
Level III | A nonrandomized controlled trial with contemporaneous controls selected by some systematic method. A control might have been selected due to its perceived suitability as a treatment option for an individual patient. |
Level IV | A before-and-after study or a case series of at least 10 patients using historical controls or controls drawn from other studies. |
Level V | A case series of at least 10 patients with no controls. |
Level VI | A case report of fewer than 10 patients. |
Abbreviation: RCT, randomized controlled trial. |
Evidence | Criteria |
---|---|
Level A | Two or more supporting RCTs of at least 10 humans with LE wounds due to DM/ND (at level I or II), a meta-analysis of RCTs, or a Cochrane Systematic Review of RCTs. |
Level B | One or more supporting RCTs of at least 10 humans with LE wounds due to DM/ND, or 2 or more supporting nonrandomized, controlled trials of at least 10 humans with LE wounds due to DM/ND (at level III). |
Level C | Other studies not meeting level B criteria, two or more supporting case series of at least 10 humans with LE wounds due to DM/ND, or expert opinion. |
Task Force Consensus | Where a level-of-evidence rating is not included, the information or recommendation represents a consensus of the task force members. |
Abbreviations: RCTs, randomized controlled trials; DM, diabetes mellitus; ND, neuropathic disease. |
Class I | Class II | Class III | Class IV |
---|---|---|---|
There is evidence and agreement of expert opinion that a procedure or treatment is beneficial and effective with greater benefit than harm. Is indicated and recommended; should be done. | There is limited evidence and agreement of expert opinion that a procedure or treatment can be beneficial and effective with greater benefit than harm. May be indicated; is reasonable to perform; may be considered. | Evidence and agreement of expert opinion about a procedure or treatment is less well established or uncertain and has conflicting evidence or divergence of opinion about the benefit and effectiveness. There are risks/side effects that may limit benefits. May be reasonable; may be considered in select instances. | There is evidence and agreement of expert opinion that a procedure or treatment is not beneficial or effective, and can be harmful in some cases where risks/side effects outweigh the benefit. Is not indicated or recommended; should not be performed. |
Mrs. Jones is an 86-year-old frail female resident of a long-term facility who has been steadily declining in health for more than a year. Her comorbid conditions include dementia, osteoarthritis of the hips and knees, congestive heart failure (CHF), hypothyroidism, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and hypertension (HTN). She no longer eats very much (weighs 88 lbs.), except for small amounts of water and liquid food offered by the long-term care (LTC) staff every 2 hours through a needleless syringe to the mouth. She can still swallow relatively well but seems to have lost interest in food. Although she could not remember any staff member's names, until recently, she used to arouse easily and smile at staff when they would sing to her. Recently, however, she has been more difficult to arouse and no longer smiles at staff even when they sing to her. Mrs. Jones moans whenever she is turned. Her family visits about once a week and has been informed of her declining status. She has been declared a "no-code," meaning no resuscitative efforts will be made to revive her if she has a cardiac or respiratory arrest. Mrs. Jones has lost 10 lbs. in the past three weeks.
Mrs. Jones does not like to be turned (as evidenced by her groaning whenever she is repositioned), and her family members do not want to see her pain increase by turning her. Her organs are failing (CHF and ESRD), and her skin is also failing (Cornish, 2019). The skin is the largest organ in the body, and at the end of life, when other systems or organs fail, the skin is likely to fail as well (Emmons & Dale, 2022).
Laboratory values:
Her hemoglobin and hematocrit are 8.5 g/dl and 32%; albumin is 2.0 g/dl; pre-albumin was not drawn in the past six months. Her BUN, creatinine, and serum glucose are all slightly elevated, as well as her sodium, indicating her serum osmolality is higher than normal. This indicates some poor nutritional values as well as potential dehydration.
Medications:
Levothyroxine 50 micrograms orally per day in the morning; Atenolol 25 mg orally daily in the morning; Furosemide 20mg orally daily in the morning.
Other clinical assessments and wound description:
Mrs. Jones has a large (6cm Long x 8cm Wide) butterfly-shaped area of deep purple discoloration to the intact skin over the sacral region (documented by the nurses as a suspected deep tissue injury or sDTI, likely related to pressure). Her skin turgor is poor, and the mucous membranes in her mouth are somewhat dry.
Pathophysiology of Kennedy terminal ulcers:
While pressure ulcers at the end of life may still be preventable and may be precipitated by shearing and friction forces, unrelieved pressure, and excessive moisture or incontinence (which could be avoidable/preventable), the
Example Image of Kennedy Terminal Ulcer
Example of silicone dressing
Photo source: molnlycke.co.uk
In summary, we have briefly discussed three fictitious cases involving "terminal wounds," or those not expected to heal completely. We have highlighted the need to consider a holistic approach to clinical care and possible ways some of these factors could be addressed: minimizing wound enlargement if possible, protecting the periwound skin (preventing or reducing periwound skin breakdown if possible), managing wound-related moisture/exudates, minimize secondary infection (bacterial and fungal), decrease unpleasant odors associated with the wound, address wound pain and psychosocial concerns (including aesthetic considerations to minimize feelings of social isolation) when approaching a clinical management plan for these patients. Every patient is unique, and you have the potential to contribute your unique gifts to a multidisciplinary team and make a positive impact on a person who is experiencing a challenging situation.
CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.