This course will be updated or discontinued on or before Sunday, February 11, 2024
CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.
≥90% of participants identify and appropriately respond to sexual harassment in the workplace.
After completing this continuing education course, the participant will be able to meet the following objectives:
Identify behaviors that might be considered sexual harassment.
Discuss the CA statutes related to Sexual Harassment.
Discuss an Anti-Harassment Program.
Discuss limited confidentiality of the complaint process.
Discuss victims’ resources.
CEUFast Inc. and the course planners for this educational activity do not have any relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.
Sexual Harassment Prevention, California SB 1343 | Two-hour
Nursing Assistants from California, only. You must read the material on this page before you can take the test. The California Department of Public Health, Training Program Review Unit has determined that is the only way to prove that you actually spent the time to read the course. Less
Sexual harassment is a universal, prevalent, destructive, and sometimes tolerated occurrence in all occupations. Instances occur daily in business, education, industry, the military, medicine, and religious organizations (Ross et al., 2020). The harasser can be a direct supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone outside the organization. Sexual harassment is a legal, safety, ethical, and social issue. Zero tolerance is expected, and incidents are subject to swift disciplinary action without retaliation.
The American Nurses Association, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine and the National Institutes of Health are three organizations that endorse a harassment-free workplace and recommend education on prevention (ANA, 2020).
The California (CA) State regulations define sexual harassment as:
Unwanted sexual advances
Visual, verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature (CDFHD), 2020)
This definition includes many forms of offensive behavior and gender-based harassment of a person of the same sex as the harasser. The following is a partial list of prohibited behavior:
Visual conduct: leering, making sexual gestures, displaying sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons, or posters.
Verbal conduct: making or using derogatory comments, epithets, slurs, and jokes. Verbal sexual abuse, graphic verbal commentaries about an individual's body, and sexually degrading words are used to describe an individual.
Physical conduct: touching, assault, impeding, or blocking movements and offering employment benefits in exchange for sexual favors.
Making or threatening retaliatory action after receiving a negative response to sexual advances (CDFHD), 2020) (CDFHD, 2020).
The harassment must be severe or pervasive to be unlawful. That means that it alters the conditions of your employment and creates an abusive work environment. A single act of harassment may be sufficiently severe to be unlawful (CDFHD, 2020).
The definition of abusive conduct is when an employer or employee in the workplace acts with malice that a reasonable person would find:
Unrelated to an employer's legitimate business interests (GC, 2020)
Abusive conduct may include:
Repeated infliction of verbal abuse, such as the use of derogatory remarks, insults, and epithets, verbal or physical conduct that a reasonable person would find threatening, intimidating, or humiliating
Gratuitous sabotage or undermining of a person's work performance (GC, 2020)
A single act shall not constitute abusive conduct unless especially severe and egregious.
Quid pro quo is a type of sexual harassment where a person in authority, such as a supervisor, conditions sexual favors in return for employment benefits (i.e., scheduling, performance appraisal, continued employment).
A legal case, Faragher v. The city of Boca Raton, provides the background for understanding the legal framework for quid pro quo. Beth Ann Faragher, a lifeguard, complained that her supervisors, Bill Terry and David Silverman, touched her inappropriately and made improper comments. For example, Faragher reported that Silverman had warned her to date him or clean the toilets for a year. Additionally, another female lifeguard, Nancy Ewanchew, complained to the City's Personnel Director, but the jeering did not stop after filing a complaint.
The lawsuit's outcome was that the City was held responsible for the supervisors' actions. The court of law decided that the supervisors were granted virtually unchecked authority over their subordinates. Further, the courts decided that the City did not exercise reasonable care to prevent the supervisors' harassing conduct (Amlong & Faragher, 2006).
Ken is the manager of a medical-surgical unit in a large metropolitan hospital in Illinois. He has been in this position for a year and is newly divorced. Jenny is a recent graduate and a new nurse on the unit who has just completed her three-month orientation and probationary period.
Ken has commented on how well Jenny fills out her scrub suit and frequently tells her how pretty she is. Ken requests that Jenny come to his apartment for a candle-light dinner to discuss her three-month performance appraisal. He claims to be a very good cook.
Jenny is irritated with Ken's comments about her body and avoids him as much as possible. She has not asked him to stop his offensive remarks because she does not want to confront her boss. She does not want to go to his place for dinner but is conflicted because she needs her job and fears reprisals if she does not meet with him as requested. What should Jenny do?
Employees should document all instances of uncomfortable behavior, including time, date, and a factual description of the event. Include the names of any witnesses. Additionally, employees should include any measures they took in their notes, such as asking the harasser to stop making comments. Notes facilitate the reporting process. Employees may also report incidences to several sources, not just one.
Employers must implement a tangible action policy and procedure to prevent sexual harassment. The plan must include investigation procedures and disciplinary measures for those found to be harassers (Amlong & Faragher, 2006). Sexual harassment procedures and disciplinary actions must be communicated to all employees and strictly enforced. Supervisors must be ready to receive and research complaints of harassment. They must be on guard to identify and take immediate steps to stop it. The discipline typically includes education, demotion, suspension, transfer, and possibly termination.
If an onlooker is subjected passively to offensive behavior and is uncomfortable, it is indirect sexual harassment because the work environment is perceived as hostile. An employee who is not precisely the target of any sexual harassment may have a valid claim to sexual harassment. Workplace sexual harassment, both direct and indirect, has been linked to emotional issues, such as downheartedness and anxiety, and may contribute to the development of burnout and depression among victims. (Takeuchi et al., 2018).
Ms. Powell, a new clinical instructor in a baccalaureate program, frequently makes sexual comments to Chuck, one of her students. She asks him about his dates and if he took his dates to bed. She remarks about his firm muscles and his sexy physique. Chuck seems to get the best assignments, that is, the most interesting patients, and Ms. Powell spends significant time helping him.
Chuck laughs at Ms. Powell when she makes sexual remarks and seems to find her comments entertaining. He is not offended. He relishes the attention and flirts with her when they eat lunch together.
Victoria, another student in the class, overhears Ms. Powell's comments to Chuck and finds them offensive and distracting. She is afraid of making mistakes because of the distraction. Victoria has not been sleeping well and is anxious about the situation. She is considering asking the Director to assign her to another instructor. She is afraid that if she says anything to Ms. Powell directly, in case, her grade will suffer.
Is Chuck a victim of sexual harassment? Is Victoria a victim of sexual harassment, although the instructor's comments are not directed toward her? What actions should be taken?
Because Chuck is not offended or annoyed by Ms. Powell's behavior, he is not a victim of sexual harassment. Sexual harassment occurs when someone objects or finds the behavior uncomfortable or intolerable, such as Victoria. Victoria is a victim of sexual harassment, although the instructor's comments are not directed toward her.
Victoria reports Ms. Powell's behavior to the Director. The Director, Mrs. Nuttall, becomes accountable once she hears what Victoria says. Following policy, Mrs. Nuttall investigates by interviewing other students in the class who confirm Ms. Powell's seductive utterances to Chuck. Mrs. Nuttall also interviews Chuck, who collaborates with the statements of the other student nurses and confirms that he is not offended. Mrs. Nuttall completes an occurrence report and makes an appointment with the Dean. The Dean disciplines Ms. Powell by giving her a week off without pay. The Dean makes it mandatory that Ms. Powell complete a three-hour remedial sexual harassment education course before returning to work.
What happens if Mrs. Nuttall's actions are incomplete? For example, what happens if Mrs. Nuttall transfers Victoria to another instructor but does not follow the policy of investigating and reporting the occurrence to the Dean? If Mrs. Nuttall or the Dean do not take proper steps to stop the unpleasant behavior, Mrs. Powell's behavior could continue and offend other students. Other students could file lawsuits and be successful since the school had prior knowledge and did not act appropriately. Students, who experience or witness sexual harassment, may seek monetary compensation in lawsuits brought under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (DOE, 1972).
Bobby is a mid-age. Audra is a 21-year-old student who has lived a sheltered life in a rural, religious setting. Bobby continually seeks Audra's attention during class breaks and school activities. Audra makes an appointment with the Dean and reports that Bobby has tried to kiss her and touch her breasts. Further, Audra reports that Bobby repeatedly asks her for dates and has sent her text messages and emails asking her for sex. Audra wants to withdraw from school because she is so uncomfortable.
The Dean asks Audra why she wants to withdraw and learns about Bobby's inappropriate behavior. Audra shows the Dean the offensive text messages and emails.
The Dean takes Audra's complaint seriously and instructs her to use the following phrases, in a calm but firm voice, if Bobby harasses her again.
"What you are saying makes me uncomfortable. Please stop right now."
"Stop harassing me. I am going to the Dean right now."
As part of the investigation, the Dean interviews Bobby, who confesses to flirting heavily with Audra. Following school policy, the Dean tells Bobby to stop and puts him on probation. The Dean writes a descriptive narrative for Bobby's file and requests that Bobby sign a written agreement indicating that he understands he will be dismissed from school for any further violations. Bobby complies, and no further incidents are reported.
While the majority of reported cases of sexual harassment involve a male harassing a female, the situation could be reversed. For example, Audra could harass Bobby. Additionally, harassment can occur between members of the same sex. Students who do not want to report matters to school officials may contact the US Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights (OCR). Information is available on their webpage. The Department of Education requests that complaints are filed within 180 days of the alleged harassment.
The CA Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) prohibits the workplace wrongful behaviors of:
Retaliation (DFEH, 2020)
FEHA also requires employers to take reasonable steps to prevent and correct wrongful behavior in the workplace. The Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is the state's enforcement agency related to the obligations under the FEHA (DFEH, 2020).
Each company must give employees a clear, easily understood, and written Anti-Harassment Policy. The policy must be discussed at meetings regularly.
Management supports and is a role model of appropriate workplace behavior. The policy should designate who will receive the complaints.
When a report of sexual harassment is received, it should be a top priority. The fact that the complaint is anonymous is not a reason to ignore the complaint (DFEH, 2020). Anonymous complaints should be investigated like other complaints.
The confidentiality of the complaint is limited (DFEH, 2020). The complaint should only be shared with those who need to know. The accused party is entitled to know the allegations against him/her.
Supervisors should keep the investigation as confidential as possible. However, there have been court rulings that say it is inappropriate for an employer to require that employees keep the information secret since employees have the right to talk.
Investigations should be started and completed as soon as reasonable.
People involved in the complaint must be counseled that retaliation violates the law and company policies. Supervisors should be alert to signs of retaliation. Retaliation can take many forms, including:
terminations or demotions
changes in assignments
failing to communicate
being ostracized or the subject of gossip (DFEH, 2020)
The FEHC regulations require an employer to take appropriate remedial steps when there is proof of misconduct. Wrongful behavior does not need to rise to the level of a policy violation or the law to require a remedy.
An employer's legal obligation is to take reasonable steps to prevent and correct unlawful behavior. Meeting this obligation includes:
Stop behavior before it rises to the level of unlawful conduct
Impose remedial action commensurate with the level of misconduct and that discourages or eliminates recurrence
Look at what the company has done in the past in similar situations to avoid claims of unfair (possibly discriminatory) remedial measures (DFEH, 2020)
Some individuals may be afraid to report harassing behaviors for fear of reprisal. They may not know that employees and students who report sexual harassment are protected from retaliation by whistleblower laws. You have the right to file a whistleblower complaint with OSHA if you believe your employer retaliated against you for exercising your rights as an employee under the whistleblower protection laws enforced by OSHA (DOL, 2020). In States with OSHA-approved State Plans, employees may file complaints under section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act with Federal OSHA and the State Plan under its equivalent statutory provision (DOL, 2020).
For CA, the OSHA designated center is:
Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH)
1515 Clay Street, 19th Floor, Oakland, California 94612
Tel: (510) 622-8965
Fax: (510) 286-7037
Select one of the following methods to complete this course.
Take TestPass an exam testing your knowledge of the course material.
CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.
American Nurses Association. Position statement on sexual harassment. ANA website. Approved April 2, 1993. Accessed January 18, 2020. Visit Source.
Amlong, WR. Faragher V. City of Boca Raton: A seven-year retrospective. FL Bar J. 2006;80(1):45. Published January 2006. Accessed January 18, 2020.
California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (2020) Sexual harassment FAQs. Accessed January 29, 2020. Visit Source.
Department of Education. Department of Education's Title IX regulations, 34 CFR Â§ 106.1 et seq. 1972. Accessed January 18, 2020. Visit Source.
DFEH – Workplace Harassment Guide for California Employers. Accessed January 29, 2020. Visit Source.
Department of Labor. The Whistle Blower Protection Program. US DOL website. Accessed January 18, 2020. Visit Source.
Government Code section 12950.1, subdivision (g)(2). Accessed January 29, 2020. Visit Source.
O'Conner SD & Supreme Court of the United States. US Reports: Davis V. Monroe County Board of Education (97-843) 526 US 629 (1999). LOC website. Accessed January 18, 2020. Visit Source.
Ross S, Naumann P, Hinds-Jackson DV, Stokes L. Sexual Harassment in Nursing: Ethical Considerations and Recommendations. OJIN. 2019;24(1); Manuscript 1. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol24No01Man01.
Takeuchi M, Nomura K, Horie S, Okinaga H, Perumalswami, CR, & Jagsi R. Direct and indirect harassment experiences and burnout among academic faculty in Japan. TJEM. 2018;245(1):37-44. doi:10.1620/tjem.245.37.