OB Early Warning Criteria

Monitoring, also known as clinical surveillance, is ongoing patient assessments that identify problems and trigger responses (Mhyre et al., 2014). A warning system is a process that defines observation criteria and sets a limit to trigger a response (Mhyre et al., 2014). Although non-obstetric warning systems have existed for nearly twenty years, there has not been a system for obstetric women until recently.

Maternal morbidity and mortality are still on the rise in the United States. Severe maternal morbidity has risen by over 200% in the United States from 1993 to 2014 (Severe Maternal Morbidity, 2019). There are some known reasons for this increase; increases in maternal age, pre-pregnancy obesity, preexisting chronic medical conditions, and cesarean delivery (Queenan, 2015). Hemorrhage, hypertension, infection, and venous thrombosis with delays in recognition, diagnosis, and treatment cause many preventable maternal deaths (Mhyre et al., 2014).

From 2003 to 2005, the Saving Mothers' Lives report recommended a modified early obstetric warning system. This system assessed vital signs and scored the woman based on the results. An algorithm was then used to determine what the woman needed. The score showed whether the woman was fine, needed closer monitoring, or immediate attention (Behling & Renaud, 2015).

After several studies, it was determined that a single-parameter risk assessment system that favors simplicity and specificity over complexity and sensitivity would be easier with increased patient specificity. Maternal mortality reviews have shown that in women who died, a disproportionate number demonstrated abnormal vital signs, suggesting that a single-parameter system should maximize specificity for patients developing a critical illness (Mhyre et al., 2014). The maternal early warning criteria were created based on these reviews.

Note. BP = blood pressure.

These triggers cannot address every possible clinical scenario that could be faced by an obstetric clinician and must not replace clinical judgment. As a core safety principal, the bedside nurse should always feel comfortable with escalating concerns at any point (Mhyre et al., 2014).

All women who meet any of The Maternal Early Warning Criteria should receive prompt bedside evaluation by a physician with the ability to activate resources to initiate emergency diagnostic and therapeutic interventions as needed (Mhyre et al., 2014). It is important to note that one abnormal measure could have been inaccurate; therefore, it should be repeated. If the patient's provider is unavailable for a prompt evaluation, a covering provider should evaluate the patient. If a woman meets the criteria and the reason cannot be determined, a maternal-fetal medicine consult, a hospital intensivist consult, or a rapid response team action is initiated. Some electronic medical records can be programmed to alert the RN and page appropriate resources (such as the attending physician) when the patient meets the criteria.

The most significant barrier to implementing an early warning criteria system is a physician and administration buy-in. Providers may not want to be bothered, especially when unavailable. It is crucial to have an in-house provider to cover these circumstances. However, many providers are reluctant to respond to and treat other providers' patients. Nurses making the call to the provider may have difficulty calling a provider who will not respond appropriately. It is vital for hospital administration to support an early warning criteria policy and ensures that providers follow it. Nurses may improve the use of the criteria if they receive praise or acknowledgment for appropriately using them.

The Council on Patient Safety in Women's Healthcare, a subcommittee of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) and the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nursing (AWHONN) both support the use of maternal early warning criteria. The findings in maternal morbidity reviews also support the use (CPSWHC, 2019).

Each hospital should have a policy that includes the criteria to trigger the early warning system, whom to notify, how to notify them, how rapidly to expect a response, and when and how to activate the clinical chain of command in order to ensure an appropriate response (CPSWHC, 2019).

Maternal early warning criteria can prevent maternal mortality. There are studies to support the effectiveness of these criteria. There are cases of complications such as preeclampsia that may not be preventable, but prompt treatment may prevent maternal morbidity or mortality. All nurses should know these criteria and have a process to activate a response.

Patient M.S. is a 42-year-old who delivered her first baby via c-section 3 hours ago. She had moderate to heavy bleeding during her recovery. Her estimated blood loss measured 1200mL. Her vital signs have been stable. She transfers to the mother-baby unit at 11 pm. She begins to complain of severe abdominal pain. She is given Dilaudid for the pain of 9 out of 10 on the pain scale. Her bleeding is moderate. Her BP is 128/84, HR 140, respirations 18, temperature 98.6. Her pulse ox is 98% on room air, and her urine output is adequate. The RN assumes the elevated HR is due to her pain. The RN returns in 1 hour to check on this patient and finds her lethargic with a BP of 90/60, HR 150, and pulse ox of 94%. The RN calls a rapid response. The patient ends up in the OR with a massive hemorrhage requiring a massive transfusion and transfer to ICU.

1. Were the RN's actions appropriate?
2. Should the early warning criteria have been activated?
3. Could the massive transfusion have been prevented?

At 11 pm, the patient's HR met early warning criteria. The HR should have been rechecked and the provider called. The RN's actions were not appropriate. HR could be elevated due to pain, but the woman had already had a hemorrhage, and her bleeding was still moderate. A massive transfusion may have been prevented if the patient had been treated with blood products sooner, but it is impossible to say it was preventable. The woman should have received care sooner.

• Behling DJ, Renaud M. Development of an Obstetric Vital Sign Alert to Improve Outcomes in Acute Care Obstetrics. Nursing for Women's Health. 2015;19(2):128-141. DOI:10.1111/1751-486x.12185.
• Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care Maternal Early Warning Criteria. Published June 11, 2019. Accessed December 5, 2019. Visit Source.
• Mhyre JM, Doria R, Hameed AB, et al. The Maternal Early Warning Criteria: A Proposal from the National Partnership for Maternal Safety. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2014;43(6):771-779. DOI:10.1111/1552-6909.12504.
• Queenan JT. Protocols for High-Risk Pregnancies: An Evidence-Based Approach. Wiley-Blackwell; 2015.
• Severe Maternal Morbidity in the United States | Pregnancy. Accessed December 1, 2019. Visit Source.