Sign Up
You are not currently logged in. Please log in to CEUfast to enable the course progress and auto resume features.

Course Library

COVID-19: Current Practice Guidelines

2 Contact Hours including 2 Advanced Pharmacology Hours
Listen to Audio
CEUfast OwlGet one year unlimited nursing CEUs $39Sign up now
This peer reviewed course is applicable for the following professions:
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), Certified Nurse Midwife, Certified Nurse Practitioner, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA), Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner, Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN), Midwife (MW), Nursing Student, Registered Nurse (RN), Registered Nurse Practitioner
This course will be updated or discontinued on or before Sunday, January 17, 2027

Nationally Accredited

CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.


Outcomes

≥ 92% of participants will know the current recommendations and guidelines in the overall management of COVID-19.

Objectives

Upon completion of this course, the participant will be able to:

  1. Recognize the latest updates on the clinical evaluation of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 variants, and disease transmission.
  2. Summarize the latest recommendations for disease prevention and limiting disease transmission.
  3. Describe various means of serology testing and laboratory assessments used to identify suspected COVID-19 cases.
  4. Identify the current variants' unique characteristics and how they affect clinical presentation.
  5. Formulate current treatment options based on age and health status.
  6. Determine current public health recommendations.
CEUFast Inc. and the course planners for this educational activity do not have any relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

Last Updated:
  • $39 Unlimited Access for 1 Year
    (Includes all state required Nursing CEs)
  • No Tests Required
    (Accepted by most states & professions)
  • Instant Reporting to CE Broker
  • Instant Access to certificates of completion
Logo Audio
Now includes
Audio Courses!
Learn More
Restart
Restart
  • 0% complete
Hide Outline
Playback Speed

Narrator Preference

(Automatically scroll to related sections.)
Done
COVID-19: Current Practice Guidelines
0:00
0:15
 
To earn a certificate of completion you have one of two options:
  1. Take test and pass with a score of at least 80%
  2. Attest that you have read and learned all the course materials.
    (NOTE: Some approval agencies and organizations require you to take a test and "No Test" is NOT an option.)
Author:    Heather Rhodes (APRN-BC)

Introduction

Since its first reported case in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a massive effect on the global economy, crumbling regional financial outlook and posing a continuous challenge to global healthcare. The catastrophic consequences of this highly contagious viral illness have since been documented in the world demographics, with about seven million deaths reported as of August 2024 (World Health Organization [WHO], n.d.). On March 11, 2020, The WHO declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, prompting the initiation of different clinical investigations and surveys focused on the presentation, diagnosis, transmission mode, and potential therapy options for the disease. Early results created substantial progress in understanding severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), limiting its spread, and developing experimental drug candidates for treatment.

However, like other ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses, SARS-CoV-2 expressed increased episodes of genetic evolution with the development of mutant variants while adapting to human hosts. In the United States, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses "genomic surveillance to track emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants that cause COVID-19" (CDC, 2024a, pg. 2). SARS-CoV-2 is continually adapting to its milieu. The WHO names new coronavirus variants using Greek alphabet letters. The Public Health Emergency ended in the United States on May 11, 2023 (Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs [ASPA], 2023), but the virus continues to mutate and spread. Currently, there are five variants (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron), with more than 90 subvariants that have been described so far. The numbers continue to climb on a weekly basis, indicating a continued need to update the global community on the current guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of COVID-19 (Rupp, 2024). This course is designed to bridge the gap between optimal clinical management of COVID-19 and the recent research discoveries on the disease.

Case Study #1

Bella Stones lived a long, healthy life, traveling around the globe on a mission after retirement. As a 68-year-old American who had worked 25 years in investment banking, Bella sure had a repository of cash to finance her trips and sight-seeing missions. All was well until March 13th, 2020. Bella was stuck in China as authorities grounded all outgoing flights as an emergency directive to curb the transmission of the recently described COVID-19 infection. Bella had just five days left on her China visit when this happened. Trapped in China, Bella continued her mission, relishing the culture and enjoying a much-needed vacation. A week later, tragedy struck.

Bella had reported to the private clinics of the Metropolitan Hotel and Resort with complaints of fever and generalized body weakness. Dismissing Bella's fears, the nursing assistant administered a shot of intravenous paracetamol. Four days later, Bella was admitted into the examination room of the resort clinic after she was found unconscious in the hotel lobby. Her body temperature peaked at 39.4 degrees Celsius with variable symptoms of shortness of breath, cough, expectoration, and limb weakness.

Her response to automatic coordination and reflex was also slow. Two days before presentation, she had developed diarrhea marked with about 5-6 stools per day. By coordinating with her healthcare insurance provider in Texas, the resort physicians established Bella's medical history of type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cirrhosis. Bella's vital signs report documented an oxygen saturation of 81%, a pulse of 100 beats/min, a respiratory rate of 27 breaths per minute, and hyperactive bowel sounds. A few hours later, Bella had also developed clinical signs suggestive of fatigue, headache, and myalgia.

Further examinations revealed labored breathing sounds and audible wet murmurs in the lungs. The abdominal architecture was normal, with no lumps or pain. In line with China's guidelines for patients admitted with low oxygen saturation and high body temperature, the physician ordered a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, considering the possibility of a COVID-19 infection. CT examination revealed bilateral pneumonia with multiple patches or ground glass appearance. Further investigations were conducted with a nucleic acid amplification test confirming the involvement of influenza A and B in Bella's illness.

A blood panel examination was ordered. The result demonstrated a considerable reduction in the normal counts of red blood cells: 2.53 × 1012 cells/liter (L); peripheral blood hemoglobin: 72 grams (g)/L; white blood cells: 0.69 × 109 cells/L; lymphocytes: 0.22 × 109 cells/L; and platelets: 41 × 109 cells/L. The neutrophil count was elevated at 0.65 × 109 cells/L. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were 121 millimeters (mm)/hours (hr) and 71.3 milligrams (mg)/L, respectively.

Considering the clinical parameters obtained and Bella's history of close contact with suspected COVID-19 cases some weeks before presentation, the attending physician ordered a COVID-19 test. Blood and saliva specimens were collected and sent to the lab. A few hours later, lab results confirmed that Bella had tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. She was immediately admitted and isolated for further treatment. On the following days of admission, Bella was administered doses of antiviral medications, including ritonavir and lopinavir. She has also been prescribed methylprednisolone sodium succinate, moxifloxacin hydrochloride sodium chloride injections, pantoprazole enteric-coated tablets, thymosin, and human immunoglobulin.

A regimen of montmorillonite powder and loperamide hydrochloride was also initiated to manage her diarrhea. Bella would eventually report a reduction in the severity of the symptoms some days later. Her diarrhea subsided, her body temperature had dropped to 38.1 degrees Celsius, and her cough had stopped. However, repeated CT scans showed no improvement in bilateral pneumonia, and the level of blood cells showed no improvement.

Despite symptomatic improvement, Bella retested positive for the virus. As with many other cases, Bella was further started on an antiviral therapy regimen to last a few weeks before another test could be ordered.

A Brief Overview of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

The history of the world, no matter how the narrative is told, will always include happenings recorded in December 2019. That month, a series of respiratory infections ravaged the city of Wuhan in the Hubei Province of China. At first, a few hundred Wuhan residents were admitted because of respiratory distress and other clinical signs suggesting pneumonia and metabolic disorders. Weeks later, things escalated quickly, with the first thousand reported admission cases. The primary cause of these strange admissions was largely unknown during this period. However, the symptomatic profile of these patients was similar in nature and occurrence to confirmed cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) several years ago.

The recurrent themes in the clinical symptoms first described by Wuhan include high-grade fever, productive cough, chest discomfort, severe dyspnea, bilateral lung infiltration, persistent diarrhea, and other clinical indications of pneumonia (Alafif et al., 2022). Preliminary investigations found a link between the first reported cases and the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, a wet market in downtown Wuhan famous for its wares of seafood, poultry, wildlife, and live animals. On December 31, 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission notified the public and made an official report to the WHO on an outbreak of pneumonia.

The 'pneumonia outbreak' was immediately scrutinized because of its similar symptomatology with MERS. RNA sequencing and examining viral particles found that the 'pneumonia outbreak' was caused by a novel beta coronavirus (Wang et al., 2024). In January 2020, independent confirmations of this report were published, igniting a chain reaction of events that would forever change the world. A few months later, thousands of cases were identified in patients with no primary or secondary contact history with Wuhan's Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.

Clusters of infections were also reported in Europe, North America, Australia, and Africa. Authorities began tracking suspected cases and eventually instituted a lockdown procedure to reduce the transmission rate. Late in February 2020, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses named the novel beta coronavirus isolated from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples of admitted patients as 'SARS-CoV-2,' and the disease itself was called Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19.

Clinical Presentation and the Evaluation of Suspected COVID-19 Infections

Recent pathogenesis data on SARS-CoV-2 interaction in humans and other primates suggest a median incubation period of 5.1 days for the virus. Host reaction and the first signs of infections are expected to develop within 11.5 days of infection (Leng et al., 2022). Patient evaluation for the confirmation of severity and viral strain can be completed within this timeframe. Evaluation should include a detailed clinical history focused on underlying comorbidities, travel history, possible exposure to confirmed COVID-19 cases, duration of symptoms, and drug history. The current CDC guideline on evaluation prescribes rapid SARS-CoV-2 testing for patients presenting with atypical clinical signs of COVID-19. These include malaise, myalgia, loss of taste, cough, sore throat, generalized body weakness, and fever. Other patients with a known history of possible high-risk exposure should also be evaluated and tested for SARS-CoV-2, even when typical symptoms are absent.

Clinical Evaluation of Suspected COVID-19 Cases

Molecular Testing

The current guidelines for treatment and evaluation recognize nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays as the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis. These assays are validated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), calibrated, and designed for the qualitative detection of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid sequence. Specimens can also be obtained from oropharyngeal swabs, anterior/mid-turbinate nasal swabs, nasopharyngeal aspirates, saliva, and bronchoalveolar lavage. Specimen collection using bronchoalveolar lavage is reserved explicitly for mechanically ventilated patients, as studies suggest a long-term activity of SARS-CoV-2 in lower respiratory tract samples. In symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, specimen collections should be done under sterile conditions and in a mechanically ventilated environment.

Specimens collected should be stored at four degrees Celsius if the immediate analysis is not feasible. In the lab, the sample should be analyzed and processed for the amplification of viral genetic material through the reverse transcription process (Cascella et al., 2023). A reverse-transcription cycle should include the synthesis of double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from the viral RNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) (Dhar et al., 2022). These cycles reveal conserved portions of the SARS-CoV-2 genetic code in the amplified material. Preliminary studies conducted on the sensitivity of PCR offered controversial results; however, this standard is considered an effective evaluation method under the right conditions. The conditions prescribed for the PCR analysis of specimens directly affect the sensitivity of PCR testing. Factors influencing this sensitivity include specimen source, exposure time, specimen adequacy, and technical specimen collection (Park et al., 2021). FDA-approved SARS-CoV-2 PCR assays should be used as they reportedly produce nearly 100% sensitivity in the absence of zero cross-contamination during specimen collection and processing (Chuang et al., 2022).

Serology Testing and Laboratory Assessments

Compared to molecular testing using PCR assays, serology testing using PCR is less effective. However, serology testing is suitable for broad surveillance of COVID-19. Serology testing commercial kits available today primarily evaluate a sample for the presence of antibodies. The most significant limitation of serology testing is low sensitivity, specificity, and weakly reproducible results. In addition to broad surveillance, public health authorities have also adopted serology testing to evaluate the level of immunity conferred on the population due to infection or mass vaccination. Recently, the CDC announced the production of an antibody test with a specificity reportedly higher than 99% and a sensitivity score of 96% (Cascella et al., 2023). The new test kit can also identify an individual with a history of COVID-19 infection.

Complete blood count (CBC) offers a comprehensive picture of the metabolic health of the liver, kidneys, and other major organs of the body. A CBC can suggest viral invasion by producing a quantitative comparison between the blood component count in suspected COVID-19 patients and healthy humans. Other lab assessments may test for inflammatory markers indicating host cell invasion. Inflammatory markers showing viral invasion include ferritin, ESR, D-dimer, CRP, lactate dehydrogenase, and procalcitonin (Sen et al., 2022).

Imaging Evaluations

Imaging evaluation should be considered based on the clinical presentations of the patient. Although there are no strict guidelines on imaging modalities of SARS-CoV-2 assessment, imaging studies may provide important information and support for diagnosis, management, and follow-up. Chest CT, lung ultrasound, and chest X-ray may give diagnostic information in the early and later stages of infection.

Chest X-ray

Chest X-ray results of patients at the early stage of infections may be completely normal. However, bilateral multifocal alveolar opacities have been observed at the advanced stages. In many patients, pleural effusion was also recorded as the alveolar opacity confluence up to the opacity of the lungs (Moodley & Sewchuran, 2022).

Lung Ultrasound

This imaging option offers valuable results in tracking the course of disease progression. In the initial stages, ultrasonographic examination of the lung identifies focal interstitial patterns and a 'white lung' at the advanced stage with evidence of subpleural consolidations. In managing COVID-19, lung ultrasounds are helpful in patient follow-up and determining the need for mechanical ventilation. Through the years, the widely reported ultrasonographic features in COVID-19 patients include:

  • Thickened 'pleural lines' with irregularities and consistent discontinuities that are entirely erratic. The 'pleural lines' are in addition to the subpleural lesions that appear as nodules or small patchy consolidations.
  • Perilesional pleural effusions.
  • Motionless, calescent 'B lines' with a flowing consistency up to the square of a 'white lung.'
  • Bilateral and posterior field thickenings are prominently visible in the lower fields (D'Ardes et al., 2022).

Clinical Presentations of COVID-19 Patients

Based on the stage of disease progression and the severity, various clinical manifestations have been documented by epidemiological surveys on COVID-19 patients. Clinical symptoms also appear to differ with age (Odada et al., 2022). Older men with comorbidities show a significant probability of developing severe respiratory diseases requiring emergency critical care. The mortality rate is higher in this population. In the young population, the symptoms most likely to be reported are those consistent with cases of mild pneumonia (Panagouli et al., 2021).

In many cases, symptoms were also absent. In pregnant women, there are studies demonstrating evidence of transplacental transmission of the virus, as the expectant mother manifests mild pneumonia symptoms. In most reported cases of infections, the symptom profile documented includes high-grade fever, cough, dyspnea, anorexia, diarrhea, and fatigue. Others include headache, chest pain, hemoptysis, sore throat, chills, and vomiting. Symptoms of olfactory and taste bud disorders have also been widely reported (Tomasino et al., 2022).

An early report of symptomatic findings in 72,314 cases in China remains the reference study on the clinical manifestation of COVID-19. About 81% of these cases were classified as mild, 14% as severe, requiring urgent medical intervention, and 5% as critical. In critical cases, patients had septic shock, respiratory failure, and multiple organ dysfunctions. As in patients with MERS and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), most of the evaluated patients also developed marked lymphopenia and high levels of plasma cytokines. In the general population, epidemiological studies have documented a list of symptoms reported based on severity and organ systems affected.

Gastrointestinal Symptoms

The most commonly reported gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms include nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, and vomiting. Abdominal pains and rumblings are also reported in many patients. In a few cases, portal vein thrombosis and acute mesenteric ischemia have been reported. Studies have reported a similar mortality rate among patients with severe GI symptoms and the overall mortality rate in COVID-19 patients (Zeng et al., 2022).

Renal Symptoms

In COVID-19 patients under intensive care, the risk of kidney injury is significantly increased. The reported renal complications are multifactorial and reflect directly on the cytotoxicity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Acute kidney injury is the most critical extrapulmonary manifestation reported in COVID-19 patients. Other important renal manifestations include hematuria, proteinuria, electrolyte imbalance, hyponatremia, metabolic acidosis, and hyperkalemia (Jdiaa et al., 2022).

Hematologic Symptoms

There is clinical evidence of venous and thromboembolic events such as deep venous thrombosis, ischemia, myocardial infarction, and arterial thromboses. In addition, there are marked elevations of fibrinogen levels, prothrombin time, D-dimer level, and partial thromboplastin time. These elevations give a logical validation for the hematological abnormalities reported in COVID-19 patients. Hematologic manifestations include lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated ESR levels, leukopenia, and leukocytosis (Al-Saadi & Abdulnabi, 2022).

Cardiac Symptoms

The burden of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases significantly influences the cardiac symptoms reported by COVID-19 patients. Meta-analysis research understudying this link has reported a significant risk of intensive care unit admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients with myocardial injury. These injuries manifest as myocarditis and myocardial ischemia. Elevated troponin levels also predisposed these patients to frequent malignant arrhythmias and a high rate of mechanical ventilation. Other important cardiac manifestations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus include cardiomyopathy, cardiogenic shock, and acute coronary syndrome (Basu-Ray et al., 2024).

Cutaneous Symptoms

Based on the result of multiple meta-analyses studying the effects of SARS-CoV-2 virus invasion on cutaneous cells, acral lesions appearing as pseudo chilblain are considered the most common cutaneous manifestation in COVID-19 patients. Unlike in other organ systems, the development of specific cutaneous symptoms seems to depend primarily on the patient's age. Other reported manifestations include erythematous maculopapular, vesicular, and urticarial rashes and erythematous multiforme-like eruptions (Sodeifian et al., 2022).

Neurologic Symptoms

Neurologic symptoms are commonly reported in the advanced stages of infection. Impairment of consciousness, seizures, ageusia, and anosmia are widely reported. Others include toxic metabolic encephalopathy, stroke, and headache. Recently, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) was reported in an epidemiological study conducted in Northern Italy (Cerón Blanco et al., 2022).

Psychiatric Symptoms

Research consistently supports that patients who survive COVID-19 are at an increased risk for developing new-onset psychiatric illnesses, including cognitive impairment, anxiety disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive disorders, sleep disorders, and substance use disorders (Stein, 2024). It is believed that there is a link between the virus and the associated inflammatory response impacting brain matter, including elevated CRP, elevated inflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin-6), and evidence of gliosis, an inflammatory change in the ventral striatum and dorsal putamen of the brain (Stein, 2024).

Modes of Transmission

As expected, the first case of human-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was first reported in Wuhan, China, after the outbreak. Human-human transmissions reportedly occurred in family clusters, meat-packing plants, migrant worker communities, and crowded settlements. Comparative studies later demonstrated how the virus is more transmissible than SARS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and other viruses of the coronaviridae family. The unique virological features and pathogenesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contribute to its transmissibility. Viral-laden droplets expelled by face-to-face exposure during talking, coughing, and sneezing are considered the primary mode of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Exposure time and the viral load in expelled droplets primarily influence the rate of transmissibility.

Prolonged exposure to infected individuals within six feet for at least 15 minutes has been linked with a high risk of transmission (Enabulele & Mobolaji, 2022). However, briefer exposure to asymptomatic patients is less likely to cause transmission. In many patients, the volume of active SARS-CoV-2 viral particles is highest at the time of symptom onset. Viral shedding and, consequently, viral transmission begins about 2-3 days before symptom onset. During this timeframe, both asymptomatic and symptomatic carriers can transmit the virus. Pharyngeal shedding is exceptionally high during the first week of infection, even before symptoms onset, meaning patients can effectively transmit the virus before they get ill.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus can also be transmitted in aerosol particles suspended in the air. These particles can linger for a long time in the air before unsuspecting individuals inhale them. Viral particles in the aerosol penetrate deep into the lung, initiating a cyclic process that ends in a viral invasion of the alveolar cells (Sussman et al., 2022). Research evidence also demonstrates the spread of the virus via inanimate and impermeable surfaces. SARS-CoV-2 can reportedly survive on these surfaces for up to 3-4 days after inoculation. This evidence provides a logical explanation for the rapid spread of COVID-19 in crowded public and hospital spaces. Although face-to-face contact exposure to viral droplets is considered the primary mode of transmission, objects such as a doorknob, cutlery, and clothing used by infected people also seem to contribute to SARS-CoV-2 spread on a larger scale (Kurver et al., 2022).

An increasing body of clinical evidence demonstrates how maternal COVID-19 cases may be associated with vertical transmission of the virus via the transplacental route. However, there are controversial reports about this transmission mode. The probability and risk of vertical transmission seem to depend on multiple factors, including the variant of SARS-CoV-2. In many cases of maternal COVID-19, maternal infection mainly occurs during the third trimester of pregnancy (Wang & Dong, 2023).

Current Treatment Options

As the pandemic ravaged, multiple types of research were initiated to develop and experiment with therapeutic options. Since the development of novel drugs may take years, the focus of these researchers was to identify possible treatment options using approved and currently marketed drugs. Drug repurposing was considered the best approach to finding an effective treatment within a limited time. Multiple clinical trials were launched, testing the virus's effects on antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anticoagulants. In addition to single-drug trials, combinations were also explored in clinical investigations to provide supportive care and disrupt the normal cycle of viral pathogenicity in infected individuals.

All currently authorized therapy strategies are designed to either alter the cycle of viral replication at the early stage of infection or control the hyperinflammatory states and the coagulation system activation. The CDC updated guidelines on treatment strategies for COVID-19 and authorized the use of antiviral therapies, anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody products, immunomodulatory agents, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors.

Antiviral Therapies

Remdesivir

Remdesivir, a broad-spectrum antiviral agent, was the first drug approved by the FDA to treat COVID-19. The high point of Remdesivir as an antiviral agent is its capacity to inhibit the effects of SARS-COV-2 as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). It inhibits the rapid replication of the virus in the host cell. Since its approval, remdesivir has been used in different clinical trials to evaluate its efficacy, safe dosage regimen, and adverse effects in special populations. In many of these studies, an improved clinical outcome was reported; however, contrasting evidence has also been reported. Contrasting findings were mainly due to a small number of randomized trials, genetic reasons, different therapy regimens, and varied study designs. Currently, the use of remdesivir is approved in adults and pediatric patients aged 28 days and above and weighing at least three kilograms (kg) (Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, 2024)

In addition to body weight and patient, the safe use of remdesivir also involves an evaluation of the disease severity. In moderate infections, no sufficient evidence recommends the use of remdesivir. However, remdesivir is appropriate for severe infections and in patients with a high risk of disease progression. The current CDC guideline also recommends a remdesivir regimen in hospitalized patients requiring supplemental oxygen without a ventilator or any other device. In a recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial published by the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers reported an 87% lower risk of hospitalization or death in at-risk patients treated with a 3-day course of remdesivir (Gottlieb et al., 2022).

Paxlovid

Paxlovid, a combination of ritonavir and nirmatrelvir, was first authorized by the FDA on December 22, 2021, for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19. Designed as an oral combination of two pills, the phase 2-3 data report of the interim analysis of Paxlovid was promising. The study, which included a participant pool of 1219 patients, found that Paxlovid reduced the risk of COVID-19-related hospital admission. Compared with a placebo group, Paxlovid reduced the all-cause mortality rate by 89% within the three days of symptom onset. In June 2022, Clinical Infectious Diseases published a report of extensive research conducted to determine the effectiveness of Paxlovid in reducing severe COVID-19 and mortality in high-risk patients. Using a participant pool of 180,351 patients, the researchers demonstrated how Paxlovid significantly decreased the rate of severe COVID-19 and mortality. The drug also appears to be more effective in older and immunosuppressed patients. Paxlovid was granted emergency use authorization for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults and children aged 12 and older who weighed at least 40 kg (Najjar-Debbiny et al., 2023).

Molnupiravir

Molnupiravir was initially developed as an antiviral medication indicated for influenza and Venezuelan equine encephalitic virus infections. Designed as an oral antiviral agent acting on the RdRp enzyme, the activity of molnupiravir on SARS-CoV-2 was tested in multiple randomized trials. Results from the phase 2-3 studies of molnupiravir found it to be effective in significantly reducing the mortality and hospitalization rate in COVID-19 patients. Different double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials have reported that early treatment with molnupiravir substantially improves the clinical outcome of mild to moderate COVID-19 while reducing the frequency of hospitalization and the risk of Long COVID complications (Jayk Bernal et al., 2022).

Although more antiviral drugs are repurposed for COVID-19 therapy, only a few have shown significant efficacy against SARS-CoV-2. Lopinavir/ritonavir is currently not indicated for COVID-19 therapy, as data from randomized trials have reported no significant effects on clinical outcomes (Temsah et al., 2022). Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine did not improve the overall mortality rate or prevent SARS-COV-2 infection (Avezum et al., 2022). Ivermectin is also not currently recommended in COVID-19 therapy as the proposed therapy regimen showed no significant resolution of symptoms (Rezai et al., 2022).

Immunomodulatory Agents

Tocilizumab

Tocilizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody, is commonly used to treat giant cell arteritis and juvenile arthritis. With its established effect on the interleukin-6 receptor, tocilizumab is considered a suitable treatment in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and presenting with clinical signs suggesting raised inflammatory markers. Although there are conflicting thoughts on the efficacy of tocilizumab in COVID-19 therapy, recent research reports showed that tocilizumab significantly reduces the mortality rate of COVID patients exhibiting rapid respiratory decompensation. It has also shown promising results in reducing the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation or death in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (Fernandez-Ruiz et al., 2022).

Corticosteroids

Cytokine release characterized by a raised volume of inflammatory markers has been linked with inflammatory-related lung injuries in SARS-COV-2 infection. There is a logical explanation for using corticosteroids as supportive therapy options during the early stages of the pandemic. Until recently, the efficacy of these medications in COVID-19 patients was poorly investigated. The initial results of the Randomized Evaluation of Covid-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) trial provided scientific backing for the use of corticosteroids, including dexamethasone (Luzzati et al., 2022). However, subsequent research suggests that the use of high-dose corticosteroids was associated with an increase in non-COVID-19 pneumonia. It is believed high dose corticosteroids increase the risk of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis, a serious non-COVID-19 infection of the respiratory tract responsible for non-COVID-19 pneumonia in patients, thus increasing mortality risk (Hashim et al., 2024).

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Products

Convalescent Plasma Therapy

Convalescent plasma therapy was initially proposed based on clinical observations that effectively neutralized the SARS-CoV-2 virus (Cascella et al., 2023); this observation led to the use of convalescent plasma therapy in patients showing no significant clinical response to first-line treatments. With this therapy option, plasma from recovered patients is injected into people not yet infected or at the mild stage of infection. The therapeutic effects of convalescent plasma were linked to its neutralizing antibodies (Nabs), autoantibodies, and immune-modulatory cytokines. Antibodies in the plasma bind to the active SARS-CoV-2 virus, neutralizing its pathogenic effect by leveraging different biological pathways.

Emerging research found that the activity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies against specific variants and subvariants varies dramatically and are no longer considered cost-effective treatment strategies against current circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants and subvariants. These products are no longer recommended by the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (Focosi et al., 2022).

Janus Kinase Inhibitors

Baricitinib

In a July 29, 2021, announcement, the FDA cleared baricitinib on an emergency authorization to treat COVID-19 in patients requiring supplemental oxygen. Baricitinib suppresses the JAK-STAT pathway, preventing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and systemic inflammation. Based on its complex interactions with the JAK and the AP2-associated protein kinase 1 (AAK1), baricitinib is proposed to have anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties useful in COVID-19 patients (Akbarzadeh-Khiavi et al., 2022). Multiple randomized clinical trials investigating the antiviral properties of baricitinib have found a significant clinical improvement in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. There are also reports of how baricitinib reduces the 2-week mortality rate and accelerates clinical improvement in patients receiving oxygen supplementation or noninvasive ventilation (Huang et al., 2022).

SARS-CoV-2 Variants

As an RNA virus, the SARS-CoV-2 is prone to rapid genetic evolutions, developing multiple mutant variants in the human host. The mutant strains of the virus are expected to exhibit different morphological characteristics and pathogenicity. Compared to the ancestral strain, variations in the pathogenicity of mutant strains are linked to possible changes in the normal cycle of viral entry, replications, and shedding. Since the beginning of the pandemic, five SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) have been described. VOCs have a high potential to cause enhanced transmissibility. They can also evade detection, exhibit resistance to established therapies, decrease vaccine effectiveness, or resist antibody neutralization effects. The SARS-CoV-2 VOCs include the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron variants.

Alpha (B.1.1.7)

The Alpha variant was first identified and reported in September 2020 in the United Kingdom, becoming the dominant strain by the end of January 2021. By the end of December 2020, the alpha variant had surpassed pre-existing variants and emerged as the predominant variant in the United States. This variant features 17 different mutations in its genomes, eight of which appear in the spike protein. The spike protein mutation increases the affinity of the virus to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, enhancing attachment to the host cell and facilitating quick entry. Since it was first identified, different researchers have been designed to investigate the clinical implications of the Alpha variant. Extensive matched cohort studies have reported an increased mortality hazard ratio in patients infected with the Alpha variant compared with other circulating variants (Saberiyan et al., 2022). The risk of death was more significant, and the outcome of complications in older patients also appeared to be substantial (Martin-Blondel et al., 2022). Several mutations in this variant also reduce the neutralizing capabilities of monoclonal antibody-based therapies (Sun et al., 2022).

Beta (B.1.351 Lineage)

The Beta variant was first identified in May 2020 in South Africa, becoming the dominant variant in the African country in a short time. Unlike the Alpha variant, this variant featured nine mutations on the spike protein, with three special mutations increasing its affinity for the ACE receptors in humans. By January 2021, the Beta variants had emerged in the United States. The multiple spike mutations of the Beta variant primarily caused the second wave of COVID-19 infections in South Africa and rapidly increased the number of infections recorded. Mathematical models estimated that the Beta variant was 50% more transmissible than other pre-existing variants in South Africa (Madhi et al., 2022). The implications of the Beta variant on therapy include an increased risk of transmission, reduction of monoclonal antibody therapy effect, and reduced post-vaccination sera.

Gamma (P.1 Lineage)

First identified and reported in December 2020 in Brazil, the Gamma variant was similar to the Beta variant in a few mutation points. The identification of this variant provides a logical explanation for the abrupt increase in the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths in Brazil during this period. As with others, the Gamma variants have ten different mutations on the spike protein. These mutations directly affect host cell attachment and entry. Mutation points also significantly reduce its susceptibility to monoclonal antibody treatments and allow it to resist neutralization by antibodies from convalescent plasma of recovered COVID-19 patients infected with earlier strains (Nicolete et al., 2022).

Delta (B.1.617.2 Lineage)

The Delta variant was first identified in India in December 2020. It emerged as the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strain following the deadly wave of COVID-19 infections and deaths in the country in April 2021. Like the Gamma variant, the Delta variant also featured different mutations on the spike protein. Preliminary investigations revealed that the Delta variant has a shorter incubation period in infected subjects. By June 2021, the Delta variant had replaced the Alpha variant as the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strain in the United Kingdom. Multiple clinical reviews have found that patients infected with the Delta variants have higher odds of requiring oxygen and intensive care admission. The mortality rate was significantly higher in many cases than in the ancestral strain. Compared with other strains, the severity of the symptoms was also higher in patients infected with this variant (Yazdanpanah et al., 2022).

Omicron (B.1.1.529 Lineage)

First detected and identified in South Africa in November 2021, the Omicron variant is the most recently named VOC by the WHO. Omicron featured a different mutation behavior by exhibiting more than 30 unique mutations on the spike proteins. Mathematical modeling studies reported a 13-fold increase in viral infectivity, making it about 2.8 times more infective than the Delta variant (Mohsin & Mahmud, 2022). Omicron has demonstrated significant resistance against authorized monoclonal antibodies except for sotrovimab (Planas et al., 2022).

SARS COV-2 Variants of Interest

In addition to Alpha and other VOCs, the WHO has also described variants of interest (VOIs). VOIs have specific genetic markers linked with modifications that may enhance virulence or transmissibility, decrease the effects of authorized therapies, reduce the efficacy of antibodies obtained by vaccination or natural infection, and increase the virus' ability to evade detection. The eight recognized variants of interest include Epsilon (B.1.427 and B.1.429); Lambda (C.37); Mu (B.1.621); Theta (P.3); Iota (B.1.526); Kappa (B.1.617.1); Zeta (P.2); and Eta (B.1.525).

Healthcare Facilities and Public Health Recommendations on Prevention and Transmission

Universal Use of Face Masks

Primary transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is through physical exposure to viral-laden droplets from an infected individual. While mask mandates are no longer in place, the correct and consistent use of face masks is still a recommended public health strategy for the prevention of transmission. With a large population of asymptomatic patients in high-risk locations, the general public is advised to use face masks when in transit or poorly ventilated areas. Available evidence supports the use of cloth face masks for source control. The updated CDC guideline recommends using non-valved, multilayered cloth masks in nursing homes and public health facilities for COVID-19 support and treatment. Health workers can also consider the use of N95 respirators if available. Non-disposable masks are recommended for community settings.

Limiting Contacts and Implementing Physical Distancing

Close physical contact in crowded spaces has been linked with an increased transmission rate. Since the virus can be transmitted through viral respiratory droplets suspended in the air, implementing a physical distancing policy in high-burden communities is still supported. The current guideline recommends maintaining a physical distance of at least six feet from suspected active infection cases and asymptomatic individuals. In many epidemiological surveys, the highest transmission rates have been documented in high-density areas and household settings (McLean et al., 2022). Setting a physical barrier and promoting visual reminders might help reduce the rate of new infections.

Increased Testing, Diagnosis, and Isolation

Although minor differences in percentages are reported, about 40% of all active COVID-19 cases are reportedly asymptomatic. Consequently, the transmission from presymptomatic and asymptomatic patients accounts for about 50% of all transmission cases (Luo et al., 2022). Increased testing for new cases is considered the best strategy for identifying the transmission trend and reducing the risk of silent transmission in a population. Routine testing in persons with known exposure is recommended. Routine testing can be planned based on occupational or residential settings and should be increased in communities with an upward trend in transmission rates. In addition, prompt isolation of all confirmed diagnoses of COVID-19 infection should be encouraged.

Vaccines and Vaccination Strategies

Vaccination is considered the most effective long-term strategy for preventing and controlling COVID-19. As of October 2020, more than 170 vaccine candidates for COVID-19 were reported, with about 51 of these candidates in different human clinical trial phases. As of April 2022, eight vaccines had the WHO's Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). These vaccines use three different technologies in their composition. These include the mRNA-based vaccines using a selected modified sequence of spike protein gene mRNA‐1273 (Moderna) and the BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer); the non-replicating adenovirus vector-based DNA vaccines (AZD1222/ChAdOx1 [Oxford/AstraZeneca], JNJ‐78436735/AD26.COV2.S [Janssen/Johnson & Johnson], and the inactivated virus vaccines (CoronaVac [Sinovac Biotech] and BIBP‐CorV [Sinopharm] (Upreti & Samant, 2022).

As of September 2024, the CDC guideline on vaccines and vaccination strategies only recognized three COVID-19 vaccines approved by the FDA under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and the Biologics License Application (BLA) schedules (CDC, 2024b). These vaccines included:

People Who ARE NOT Moderately or Severely Immunocompromised
Initial Vaccination
6 months - 4 yearsTwo doses of 2024-2025 ModernaOR Three doses of 2024-2025 Pfizer-BioNTech
5 years and olderOne dose of 2024-2025 ModernaOR One dose of 2024-2025 Pfizer-BioNTech
Received Previous Doses of a COVID-19 Vaccine
6 months – 4 yearsOne or Two doses of 2024–­2025 mRNA vaccine from the same manufacturer as administered for initial vaccination, depending on the vaccine and the number of prior doses
5 years and olderOne dose of 2024–­2025 Moderna or 1 dose of 2024–­2025 Pfizer-BioNTech
Additional dose: An additional dose of 2024–­2025 COVID-19 vaccine for people ages 65 years and older who are not moderately or severely immunocompromised is NOT currently recommended.
CDC, 2024b
People Who ARE Moderately or Severely Immunocompromised
Initial Vaccination
6 months and older3 doses of 2024-2025 ModernaOR 3 doses of 2024-2025 Pfizer-BioNTech
Received Previous Doses of a COVID-19 Vaccine: Recommended mRNA vaccine and number of 2024–­2025 doses are based on age and vaccination history.
Additional doses: People who are moderately or severely immunocompromised, ages six months and older, may receive one or more age-appropriate doses of a 2024–2025 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
CDC, 2024b

Novavax, a COVID-19 vaccination that has been granted EUA in the United States for the 2024 updated version (United States FDA, 2024), is only authorized in clients aged 12 and older. For individuals who have never been vaccinated, two doses three weeks apart are recommended. For individuals who have had a prior COVID-19 vaccine series, a single dose of Novavax 12 months after the last COVID-19 vaccine is recommended (United States FDA, 2024).

The current CDC guideline also recommends an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer or Moderna) for primary and booster vaccination in all populations. Pemivibart (Pemgarda) is a monoclonal antibody for people who are moderately or severely immunocompromised (CDC, 2024b). Clients who receive this pre-exposure preventative treatment must meet strict FDA-authorized conditions and understand that pemivibart (Pemgarda) is not a replacement for COVID-19 vaccination (CDC, 2024b). The vaccination schedules recommended by the CDC categorize the population into two groups: people who are moderately or severely immunocompromised and those who are not moderately or severely immunocompromised. In all cases of vaccination, an age-appropriate vaccine should be selected based on the recipient's age and the day of vaccination.

Special Population Considerations

Infants and Young Children

According to the CDC, as of September 2024, there is currently no FDA-approved or FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccination available for children younger than six months of age.

Pre-term infants (those born before 37 weeks gestation), regardless of their weight at birth, are eligible to receive COVID-19 vaccination at their chronological age and abide by the same schedule that full-term infants and children utilize (CDC, 2024b).

Children Who Transition from a Younger to an Older Age Group During Vaccine Series

Another common question is regarding what dose should be given to a child who transitions to an older age group within their COVID-19 vaccine course series. The CDC recommends that all vaccine recipients receive the age-appropriate dosage that is recommended for their age and day of vaccination (CDC, 2024b).

Pregnant Individuals

The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy contribute to the benefits outweighing any potential risks of vaccination (CDC, 2024b). Because pregnancies affected by COVID-19 are associated with an increased risk of stillbirths or pre-term birth, it is recommended by the CDC that pregnant individuals receive COVID-19 vaccination and stay up to date with CDC recommendations regarding further updates and/or boosters (CDC, 2024b). Recent studies have revealed that the antibodies produced in the pregnant individual following vaccination are transferred to the newborn, reducing the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization in children less than six months of age (CDC, 2024b).

Long-Term Complications in COVID-19 Patients

SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells has been linked with multiple organ dysfunctions and general body illnesses. In patients with pre-existing medical conditions, including diabetes, chronic kidney diseases, and cardiovascular diseases, the risk of developing a systemic illness or long-term complications of COVID-19 is higher. In this population, the most reported complications of COVID-19 include multiple organ failure, acute respiratory failure, and sudden clinical deterioration. In the long term, there is an increased risk of myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, and ischemic strokes (Katsoularis et al., 2022). Cardiogenic shock, malignant arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathies have also been reported. Acute renal failure is another long-term complication of COVID-19 linked with a high risk of mortality (Sabaghian et al., 2022).

Collating data from collaborative studies on COVID-19 reveals dysfunctional/delayed bladder emptying as a common long-term neurologic complication. Other prominent ones include ptosis, mild residual peripheral neuropathy, and facial weakness (Valderas et al., 2022). A post-viral cough lasting for about eight weeks has been reported as a common pulmonary complication of COVID-19. Chest tightness, difficulty in breathing, and rhinorrhea have also been reported in children (Borch et al., 2022). Nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting are the most reported gastrointestinal complications. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) has also been reported in many cases. Researchers have reported a high incidence of major depressive disorder as a common psychiatric complication in adolescents. Other findings have also reported anxiety, avoidance, arousal, and consistent flashbacks in many patients. In patients with an onset of COVID-19 complications, clinical support is recommended.

Case Study #2

Frank Doyle, a 42-year-old Caucasian male, previously healthy with no significant past medical history, contracted COVID-19 in December 2020. He experienced moderate symptoms, including fever, fatigue, and loss of taste and smell, and recovered at home without the need for hospitalization. However, months after his acute illness, he began experiencing a range of persistent symptoms that ultimately led to a diagnosis of Long COVID-19. Among these symptoms, he developed psychosis, which became the most concerning aspect of his condition.

Presenting Complaints: In June 2021, approximately six months post-infection, Frank Doyle began to notice cognitive difficulties, including memory lapses and difficulty concentrating. He also reported persistent fatigue, shortness of breath, and occasional heart palpitations. By July 2021, his mental health symptoms had worsened. He described experiencing vivid and disturbing hallucinations, both auditory and visual. He began to experience paranoia, believing that he was being watched and that people were plotting against him, despite no evidence to support these beliefs.

Medical History: Mr. Doyle had no prior history of mental illness, including psychosis, depression, or anxiety. He had no history of substance abuse and was not taking any medications regularly before contracting COVID-19. His family history was negative for psychiatric disorders.

Clinical Examination: Upon examination, Mr. Doyle appeared anxious and somewhat agitated. He was oriented to person, place, and time but had a markedly paranoid affect. He described hearing voices that were not present and seeing shadowy figures that he believed were following him. His physical examination was unremarkable, with no neurological deficits noted.

Investigations:

  • Blood Tests: Routine blood work, including complete blood count, liver function tests, and thyroid function tests, were within normal limits.
  • Neuroimaging: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed no structural abnormalities.
  • Electroencephalogram (EEG): Normal, with no evidence of epileptiform activity.
  • Psychiatric Assessment: A full psychiatric evaluation confirmed the presence of paranoid delusions and hallucinations consistent with psychosis.

Mr. Doyle was diagnosed with Long COVID-19, with a significant neuropsychiatric complication in the form of psychosis. This was classified as post-COVID-19 psychosis, a rare but increasingly recognized manifestation of Long COVID-19.

Mr. Doyle was started on the atypical antipsychotic medication, olanzapine, at a low dose, which was gradually titrated based on his response and tolerance. He also received supportive psychotherapy to help him cope with the distress caused by his symptoms. His treatment plan included regular follow-up with a psychiatrist and close monitoring for any potential side effects of the medication.

In addition to his psychiatric treatment, Mr. Doyle was referred to a multidisciplinary Long COVID-19 clinic, where he received comprehensive care for his other lingering symptoms, including fatigue and cognitive impairment. His treatment included graded exercise therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and nutritional support to address his overall health.

Over the course of several months, Mr. Doyle's psychotic symptoms gradually improved with medication. His hallucinations became less frequent and less intense, and his paranoid delusions subsided. However, he continued to experience mild cognitive difficulties and fatigue, which were managed through ongoing therapy and lifestyle modifications.

This case highlights the complex and multifaceted nature of Long COVID-19, particularly its potential to affect mental health. While respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms are more commonly reported, neuropsychiatric symptoms such as psychosis, though rare, can have a profound impact on a patient's quality of life. The exact pathophysiology underlying post-COVID-19 psychosis remains unclear, but it is hypothesized to involve direct viral effects on the brain, immune-mediated mechanisms, and the psychological trauma of prolonged illness and isolation.

Early recognition and intervention are crucial in managing post-COVID-19 psychosis. A multidisciplinary approach involving mental health professionals, primary care providers, and specialists in Long COVID-19, is essential to address the full spectrum of symptoms and improve patient outcomes.

Mr. Doyle's case underscores the importance of considering neuropsychiatric complications in patients with Long COVID-19. This case study also highlights the need for further research into the neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 to develop more effective treatment strategies and improve patient care.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 and its variants have wreaked havoc in different parts of the world, resulting in deaths and disabilities. Until a large percentage of the global population is vaccinated, the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its variants will remain a considerable threat to global healthcare systems. As it stands, enforcing the CDC prevention strategies and ensuring age-appropriate vaccination using the right vaccines are the best approach to curbing the spread of this virus. While the search for more vaccines and a cure continues, clinical providers are encouraged to adopt a holistic care plan that prioritizes prevention, patient education, and supportive care. Clinicians are also expected to maintain a high index of suspicion in individuals with prior exposure to symptomatic or asymptomatic patients and those from a high-risk region.

To change the pandemic's dynamic, community clinics and support centers should be well-equipped to triage moderate and high-risk patients, using the approved guidelines on patient examination and therapy selection. Continued viral surveillance should be performed at regular intervals to ascertain the level of risk posed by new variants of the virus. The importance of public education on symptom presentation and available vaccine options should not be undermined. Adopting this multi-pronged approach toward this viral disease goes a long way in eliminating the virus and maintaining a healthy global population.

Select one of the following methods to complete this course.

Take TestPass an exam testing your knowledge of the course material.
OR
No TestAttest that you have read and learned all the course materials.

Implicit Bias Statement

CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.

References

  • Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response. (2024). Remdesivir. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Visit Source.
  • Akbarzadeh-Khiavi, M., Torabi, M., Rahbarnia, L., & Safary, A. (2022). Baricitinib combination therapy: A narrative review of repurposed Janus kinase inhibitor against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Infection, 50(2), 295–308. Visit Source.
  • Alafif, T., Etaiwi, A., Hawsawi, Y., Alrefaei, A., Albassam, A., & Althobaiti, H. (2022). DISCOVID: discovering patterns of COVID-19 infection from recovered patients: A case study in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Technology, 14(6), 2825–2838. Visit Source.
  • Al-Saadi, E. A. K. D., & Abdulnabi, M. A. (2022). Hematological changes associated with COVID-19 infection. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 36(1), e24064. Visit Source.
  • Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA). (2023). Fact sheet: End of the COVID-19 public health emergency. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Visit Source.
  • Avezum, Á., Oliveira, G. B. F., Oliveira, H., Lucchetta, R. C., Pereira, V. F. A., Dabarian, A. L., D O Vieira, R., Silva, D. V., Kormann, A. P. M., Tognon, A. P., De Gasperi, R., Hernandes, M. E., Feitosa, A. D. M., Piscopo, A., Souza, A. S., Miguel, C. H., Nogueira, V. O., Minelli, C., Magalhães, C. C., Morejon, K. M. L., … COPE - COALITION COVID-19 Brazil V Investigators. (2022). Hydroxychloroquine versus placebo in the treatment of non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (COPE - Coalition V): A double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet regional health. Americas, 11, 100243. Visit Source.
  • Basu-Ray, I., Almaddah, N. K., Adeboye, A., Vaqar, S., & Soos, M. P. (2024). Cardiac Manifestations of Coronavirus (COVID-19). In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. Visit Source.
  • Borch, L., Holm, M., Knudsen, M., Ellermann-Eriksen, S., & Hagstroem, S. (2022). Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS-CoV-2 positive children- A nationwide cohort study. European Journal of Pediatrics, 181(4), 1597–1607. Visit Source.
  • Cascella, M., Rajnik, M., Aleem, A., Dulebohn, S. C., & Di Napoli, R. (2023). Features, Evaluation, and Treatment of Coronavirus (COVID-19). In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. Visit Source.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2024a). CDC’s role in tracking variants. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Visit Source.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2024b). Clinical guidance for COVID-19 vaccination. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Visit Source.
  • Cerón Blanco, N., Rodríguez Quintana, J. H., Valencia Mendoza, M. C., Forero Botero, C. A., Rodríguez, L. C., Carrillo Villa, S., Gómez Mazuera, A. M., Angarita Díaz, J. A., Uribe García, B., Bermúdez Riveros, C. C., & Alban, J. (2022). Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case series from 4 Colombian cities during the pandemic. Neurology perspectives, 2(4), 232–239. Visit Source.
  • Chuang, H. N., Shih, C. H., Tsai, H. W., Jiang, R. S., Hsiao, T. H., Liu, P. Y., Jan, Y. J., & Wang, J. M. (2022). Laboratory surge response to the COVID-19 pandemic: An incident command system approach. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15, 1083–1088. Visit Source.
  • D'Ardes, D., Tana, C., Salzmann, A., Ricci, F., Guagnano, M. T., Giamberardino, M. A., & Cipollone, F. (2022). Ultrasound assessment of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A literature review for the primary care physician. Annals of Medicine, 54(1), 1140–1149. Visit Source.
  • Dhar B. C. (2022). Diagnostic assay and technology advancement for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections causing the COVID-19 pandemic. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 414(9), 2903–2934. Visit Source.
  • Enabulele, O., & Mobolaji, A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic: an assessment of risk perception and the implementation of precautionary measures in a group of primary care workers in Nigeria. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 62(4), E822–E829. Visit Source.
  • Fernández-Ruiz, M., López-Medrano, F., Carretero, O., Parra, P., Ruiz-Merlo, T., Aguado, J. M., & H12O Immunomodulation Therapy for COVID-19 Group. (2022). Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis. Medicina Clinica (English ed.), 158(12), 608–612. Visit Source.
  • Focosi, D., McConnell, S., Casadevall, A., Cappello, E., Valdiserra, G., & Tuccori, M. (2022). Monoclonal antibody therapies against SARS-CoV-2. The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 22(11), e311–e326. Visit Source.
  • Gottlieb, R. L., Vaca, C. E., Paredes, R., Mera, J., Webb, B. J., Perez, G., Oguchi, G., Ryan, P., Nielsen, B. U., Brown, M., Hidalgo, A., Sachdeva, Y., Mittal, S., Osiyemi, O., Skarbinski, J., Juneja, K., Hyland, R. H., Osinusi, A., Chen, S., Camus, G., … GS-US-540-9012 (PINETREE) Investigators. (2022). Early Remdesivir to prevent progression to severe Covid-19 in outpatients. The New England Journal of Medicine, 386(4), 305–315. Visit Source.
  • Hashim, Z., Nath, A., & Tripathy, N. K. (2024). High-dose corticosteroid therapy in COVID-19: The RECOVERY trial. Lancet, 403(10434), 1337–1338. Visit Source.
  • Huang, J., Zhou, C., Deng, J., & Zhou, J. (2022). JAK inhibition as a new treatment strategy for patients with COVID-19. Biochemical Pharmacology, 202, 115162. Visit Source.
  • Jayk Bernal, A., Gomes da Silva, M. M., Musungaie, D. B., Kovalchuk, E., Gonzalez, A., Delos Reyes, V., Martín-Quirós, A., Caraco, Y., Williams-Diaz, A., Brown, M. L., Du, J., Pedley, A., Assaid, C., Strizki, J., Grobler, J. A., Shamsuddin, H. H., Tipping, R., Wan, H., Paschke, A., Butterton, J. R., … MOVe-OUT Study Group. (2022). Molnupiravir for oral treatment of Covid-19 in nonhospitalized patients. The New England Journal of Medicine, 386(6), 509–520. Visit Source.
  • Jdiaa, S. S., Mansour, R., El Alayli, A., Gautam, A., Thomas, P., & Mustafa, R. A. (2022). COVID-19 and chronic kidney disease: An updated overview of reviews. Journal of Nephrology, 35(1), 69–85. Visit Source.
  • Katsoularis, I., Fonseca-Rodríguez, O., Farrington, P., Jerndal, H., Lundevaller, E. H., Sund, M., Lindmark, K., & Fors Connolly A. M. (2022). Risks of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding after COVID-19: Nationwide self-controlled cases series and matched cohort study. BMJ, 377, e069590. Visit Source.
  • Kurver, L., van den Kieboom, C. H., Lanke, K., Diavatopoulos, D. A., Overheul, G. J., Netea, M. G., Ten Oever, J., van Crevel, R., Mulders-Manders, K., van de Veerdonk, F. L., Wertheim, H., Schouten, J., Rahamat-Langendoen, J., van Rij, R. P., Bousema, T., van Laarhoven, A., & de Jonge, M. I. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 RNA in exhaled air of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Scientific reports, 12(1), 8991. Visit Source.
  • Leng, T., Hill, E. M., Keeling, M. J., Tildesley, M. J., & Thompson, R. N. (2022). The effect of notification window length on the epidemiological impact of COVID-19 contact tracing mobile applications. Communications Medicine, 2, 74. Visit Source.
  • Luo, T., Cao, Z., Wang, Y., Zeng, D., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Role of Asymptomatic COVID-19 Cases in Viral Transmission: Findings From a Hierarchical Community Contact Network Model. IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, 19(2), 576–585. Visit Source.
  • Luzzati, R., De Luca, M., Sanson, G., Borelli, M., Biolo, G., Giacomazzi, D., Zerbato, V., & Di Bella, S. (2022). Potential of outpatient steroid therapy in elderly patients with early COVID-19. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(10), 2585–2590. Visit Source.
  • Madhi, S. A., Kwatra, G., Myers, J. E., Jassat, W., Dhar, N., Mukendi, C. K., Nana, A. J., Blumberg, L., Welch, R., Ngorima-Mabhena, N., & Mutevedzi, P. C. (2022). Population immunity and Covid-19 severity with Omicron variant in South Africa. The New England Journal of Medicine, 386(14), 1314–1326. Visit Source.
  • Martin-Blondel, G., Lescure, F. X., Assoumou, L., Charpentier, C., Chapplain, J. M., Perpoint, T., Grouteau, G., Cordel, H., Pialoux, G., Pacanowski, J., Thy, M., Bauvois, A., Laureillard, D., Hamrouni, F., Algarte-Genin, M., Poissy, J., Descamps, D., Costagliola, D., & CoCliCo Study Group. (2022). Increased risk of severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant infection: A multicentre matched cohort study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 22(1), 540. Visit Source.
  • McLean, H. Q., Grijalva, C. G., Hanson, K. E., Zhu, Y., Deyoe, J. E., Meece, J. K., Halasa, N. B., Chappell, J. D., Mellis, A. M., Reed, C., Belongia, E. A., Talbot, H. K., & Rolfes, M. A. (2022). Household transmission and clinical features of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Pediatrics, 149(3), e2021054178. Visit Source.
  • Mohsin, M., & Mahmud, S. (2022). Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern: A review on its transmissibility, immune evasion, reinfection, and severity. Medicine, 101(19), e29165. Visit Source.
  • Moodley, S., & Sewchuran, T. (2022). Chest radiography evaluation in patients admitted with confirmed COVID-19 infection, in a resource limited South African isolation hospital. SA Journal of Radiology, 26(1), 2262. Visit Source.
  • Najjar-Debbiny, R., Gronich, N., Weber, G., Khoury, J., Amar, M., Stein, N., Goldstein, L. H., & Saliba, W. (2023). Effectiveness of Paxlovid in peducing severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 and mortality in high-risk patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 76(3), e342–e349. Visit Source.
  • Nicolete, V. C., Rodrigues, P. T., Fernandes, A. R. J., Corder, R. M., Tonini, J., Buss, L. F., Sales, F. C., Faria, N. R., Sabino, E. C., Castro, M. C., & Ferreira, M. U. (2022). Epidemiology of COVID-19 after emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant, Brazilian Amazon, 2020-2021. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 28(3), 709–712. Visit Source.
  • Odada, D. E., Ndai, J., Kimeu, J., Shah, J., & Shah, R. (2022). Preadmission testing for COVID-19 as a screening strategy: A retrospective chart review from a tertiary hospital in Kenya. Infection Prevention in Practice, 4(3), 100231. Visit Source.
  • Panagouli, E. D., Thirios, A. C., Psaltopoulou, T., Bacopoulou, F., Troupis, T. G., Chrousos, G. P., Tsolia, M. N., Sergentanis, T. N., & Tsitsika, A. K. (2021). COVID-19 features in children and adolescents: A systematic review and pooled analysis. EMBnet.Journal, 26, e946. Visit Source.
  • Park, J. H., Cha, M. J., Choi, H., Kim, M. C., Chung, J. W., Lee, K. S., Jeong, D. G., Baek, M. S., Kim, W. Y., Lim, Y., Yoon, S. W., & Choi, S. H. (2022). Relationship between SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer and the severity of COVID-19. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection, 55(6 Pt 1), 1094–1100. Visit Source.
  • Planas, D., Saunders, N., Maes, P., Guivel-Benhassine, F., Planchais, C., Buchrieser, J., Bolland, W. H., Porrot, F., Staropoli, I., Lemoine, F., Péré, H., Veyer, D., Puech, J., Rodary, J., Baele, G., Dellicour, S., Raymenants, J., Gorissen, S., Geenen, C., Vanmechelen, B., … Schwartz, O. (2022). Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature, 602(7898), 671–675. Visit Source.
  • Rezai, M. S., Ahangarkani, F., Hill, A., Ellis, L., Mirchandani, M., Davoudi, A., Eslami, G., Roozbeh, F., Babamahmoodi, F., Rouhani, N., Alikhani, A., Najafi, N., Ghasemian, R., Mehravaran, H., Hajialibeig, A., Navaeifar, M. R., Shahbaznejad, L., Rahimzadeh, G., Saeedi, M., Alizadeh-Navai, R., … Valadan, R. (2022). Non-effectiveness of Ivermectin on inpatients and outpatients with COVID-19; Results of two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 919708. Visit Source.
  • Rupp, M. E. (2024). What COVID-19 variants are going around in August 2024? Nebraska Medicine. Visit Source.
  • Sabaghian, T., Kharazmi, A. B., Ansari, A., Omidi, F., Kazemi, S. N., Hajikhani, B., Vaziri-Harami, R., Tajbakhsh, A., Omidi, S., Haddadi, S., Shahidi Bonjar, A. H., Nasiri, M. J., & Mirsaeidi, M. (2022). COVID-19 and acute kidney injury: A systematic review. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 705908. Visit Source.
  • Saberiyan, M., Karimi, E., Khademi, Z., Movahhed, P., Safi, A., & Mehri-Ghahfarrokhi, A. (2022). SARS-CoV-2: phenotype, genotype, and characterization of different variants. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, 27(1), 50. Visit Source.
  • Sen, A., Nigam, A., & Vachher, M. (2022). Role of polypeptide inflammatory biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of COVID-19. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics, 28(2), 59. Visit Source.
  • Sodeifian, F., Mushtaq, S., & Rezaei, N. (2022). Cutaneous manifestation of COVID-19: What have we learned an year into the pandemic?. Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas, 113(2), 157–165. Visit Source.
  • Stein, M. B. (2024). COVID-19: Psychiatric illness. UpToDate. Visit Source.
  • Sun, C., Xie, C., Bu, G. L., Zhong, L. Y., & Zeng, M. S. (2022). Molecular characteristics, immune evasion, and impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 7(1), 202. Visit Source.
  • Sussman, R. A., Golberstein, E., & Polosa, R. (2022). Analytic modeling and risk assessment of aerial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus through vaping expirations in shared micro-environments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(55), 83020–83044. Visit Source.
  • Temsah, M. H., Al-Jelaify, M., & Memish, Z. A. (2022). Guidance for the pharmacological management of COVID-19 in the emergency setting. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 23(6), 639–642. Visit Source.
  • Tomasino, B., Pellitteri, G., Bax, F., Marini, A., Surcinelli, A., Gigli, G. L., & Valente, M. (2022). Multisensory mental representation in Covid-19 patients and the possibility of long-lasting gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in the CNS. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 7340. Visit Source.
  • Upreti, S., & Samant, M. (2022). A review on immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 and various COVID-19 vaccine regimens. Pharmaceutical Research, 39(9), 2119–2134. Visit Source.
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2024). FDA authorizes updated Novavax COVID-19 vaccine to better protect against currently circulating variants. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Visit Source.
  • Valderas, C., Méndez, G., Echeverría, A., Suarez, N., Julio, K., & Sandoval, F. (2022). COVID-19 and neurologic manifestations: A synthesis from the child neurologist's corner. World Journal of Pediatrics, 18(6), 373–382. Visit Source.
  • Wang, J., & Dong, W. (2023). COVID-19: The possibility, ways, mechanisms, and interruptions of mother-to-child transmission. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 307(6), 1687–1696. Visit Source.
  • Wang, G., Verma, A. K., Guan, X., Bu, F., Odle, A. E., Li, F., Liu, B., Perlman, S., & Du, L. (2024). Pan-Beta-Coronavirus subunit vaccine prevents SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV challenge. Journal of Virology, e0037624. Visit Source.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Who Covid-19 dashboard. World Health Organization. Visit Source.
  • Yazdanpanah, F., Yazdanpanah, S., & Rezaei, N. (2022). COVID-19 Delta variation; more contagious or more pernicious?. Acta Biomedica, 92(6), e2021454. Visit Source.
  • Zeng, W., Qi, K., Ye, M., Zheng, L., Liu, X., Hu, S., Zhang, W., Tang, W., Xu, J., Yu, D., & Wei, Y. (2022). Gastrointestinal symptoms are associated with severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 34(2), 168–176. Visit Source.