Sign Up
You are not currently logged in. Please log in to CEUfast to enable the course progress and auto resume features.

Course Library

Diabetic Medications (FL INITIAL Autonomous Practice - Pharmacology)

3 Contact Hours including 3 Advanced Pharmacology Hours
Only FL APRNs will receive credit for this course.
Listen to Audio
CEUfast OwlGet one year unlimited nursing CEUs $39Sign up now
This course is only applicable for Florida nurse practitioners who need to meet the autonomous practice initial licensure requirement.
This peer reviewed course is applicable for the following professions:
Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN)
This course will be updated or discontinued on or before Sunday, October 12, 2025

Nationally Accredited

CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.


Outcomes

≥ 92% of participants will know how to administer diabetic medications safely and effectively.

Objectives

After completing this continuing education course, the participant will be able to:

  1. Describe the mechanism of action of diabetic medications.
  2. Identify the mechanism of action of insulin.
  3. List the significant adverse effects of each diabetic medication.
  4. Explain the important considerations of administration of insulin.
  5. Indicate the precautions and US Boxed warnings for diabetic medications.
  6. Compare and contrast the indication for use for each diabetic medication.
CEUFast Inc. and the course planners for this educational activity do not have any relevant financial relationship(s) to disclose with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

Last Updated:
Restart
Restart
  • 0% complete
Hide Outline
Playback Speed

Narrator Preference

(Automatically scroll to related sections.)
Done
Diabetic Medications (FL INITIAL Autonomous Practice - Pharmacology)
0:00
0:15
 
To earn of certificate of completion you have one of two options:
  1. Take test and pass with a score of at least 80%
  2. Reflect on practice impact by completing self-reflection, self-assessment and course evaluation.
    (NOTE: Some approval agencies and organizations require you to take a test and self reflection is NOT an option.)
Author:    Dana Bartlett (RN, BSN, MA, MA, CSPI)

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the United States (US). Approximately 37.3 million people (11.3% of the population) in the US have diabetes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2022). Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cause significant microvascular and macrovascular complications (Powers et al., 2022a). These complications are the major cause of morbidity and mortality for diabetic patients (Limonte et al., 2022; Natarajan, 2021).

Chronic hyperglycemia is the defining characteristic of DM, and it is a primary cause of diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy, and diabetic retinopathy (Guedes & Pecoits-Fiho, 2022; Li et al, 2022; Natarajan, 2021; Powers et al., 2022a; Wu et al., 2021a; Ang et al., 2022; James et al., 2022; Powers et al., 2022a; Whitehead et al., 2018). In addition, T1DM and T2DM and hyperglycemia are strong risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease (Aroda & Eckel, 2022; Kolasa et al., 2023; Powers et al., 2022b). The pathogenic mechanisms that cause T1DM and T2DM are different, but the primary derangement of both types of the disease is hyperglycemia (Powers et al., 2022b):

In T1DM hyperglycemia is caused by the absence of insulin production.
In T2DM hyperglycemia is caused by decreased insulin production and increased insulin resistance.

Reducing hyperglycemia and controlling blood glucose can prevent microvascular complications of DM from occurring and progressing, and it may reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease, especially for patients who have T2DM and are treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, aka GLP-1-RAs (Aroda & Eckel, 2022; Limonte et al., 2022; Navaneethan et al., 2023; Powers et al., 2022d).

Hyperglycemia can be reduced by lifestyle modifications. However, T1DM is caused by the destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas.

Image 1:
Beta Cells

graphic showing beta cells

Patients who have T1DM need exogenous insulin to survive.

Image 2:
Type I Diabetes

graphic showing type 1 diabetes

For patients who have T2DM, remission of the disease is possible (Chang, 2023; Kim & Kwon, 2022). However, remission requires (for some patients) bariatric surgery, intensive glucose control, and intensive lifestyle modifications and this approach must be done early in the course of the disease before the irreversible decline of the beta cells has progressed too far (Chang, 2023; Kim & Kwon, 2022).

Image 3:
Type II Diabetes

graphic showing type 2 diabetes

Unfortunately, many T2DM patients cannot make the required lifestyle changes (Han et al., 2023). T2DM may be present for many years, possibly up to 10 years, before it is detected and at that time, patients will need antidiabetic drugs (ElSayed et al., 2023; Powers et al., 2022b). It is recommended that pharmacologic therapy begins at the time that T2DM is diagnosed, except in the event of contraindications (ElSayed et al., 2023a).

There are 12 classes of drugs used to treat T2DM and there are many types of insulin. This module will discuss (Taylor et al., 2021):

  1. Insulin, injectable, and inhaled
  2. Non-insulin injectable antidiabetics: Amylinomimetic pramlintide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP/GI receptor agonist, tirzepatide
  3. Oral antidiabetics: ɑ-glucosidase inhibitors, biguanides, DPP-IV inhibitors, meglitinide analogs, sodium-glucose co-transport type 2 inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones

These topics will be covered for each drug: Available forms and dosing, including dosing adjustments for patients who have hepatic and/or renal impairment, mechanism of action, indications for use, contraindications, US Boxed Warning (if one is used), warnings and precautions, and adverse effects.

The onset of effect, the peak effect, and the duration of effect vary considerably between insulin preparations, and as insulin directly lowers blood glucose, knowing the pharmacokinetics of an insulin preparation is very important, and a short summary of that information will be provided here.

Diabetes is a complex disease, and the medications used to treat diabetes are complex, as well, especially the mechanisms of action. This is a simple way to understand these mechanisms of action and apply that understanding to patient care:

  1. Insulin and the meglitinide analogs, nateglinide and repaglinide, directly lower blood sugar and by themselves. They can then, in turn, cause hypoglycemia. 
  2. The other diabetic medications, by way of different mechanisms of action like increasing insulin sensitivity or increasing the excretion of excess glucose, help maintain a normoglycemic state. They do not, by themselves, cause hypoglycemia. (Note: Concurrent use of many of these drugs and insulin or a sulfonylurea can cause hypoglycemia).

Case Study # 1: Allen

A 47-year-old male with no significant PMH visits his primary care physician because he has been experiencing fatigue, dizziness, and lack of energy. These symptoms started approximately four months ago. Initially, his symptoms were intermittent and mild, but they worsened in intensity and frequency the week before his visit. He cannot attribute their occurrence to any activity or time of day. He does report that his father had a history of diabetes.

Today’s Results:

  • BP: 162/88
  • Weight: 118 kg, classifying him for his height as obese
  • Smoking status: Smoker
  • Serum cholesterol: 280 mg/dL
  • Serum triglycerides: Elevated
  • Fasting serum glucose: 225 mg/dL
  • Hemoglobin A1C (HgA1C): 9.9% (Note: Normal A1C is < 5.7%)

On examination, there is no evidence of retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy on the exam or by laboratory testing.

The physician makes a diagnosis of T2DM. She advises the patient about lifestyle alterations (low-fat diet, exercise, smoking cessation, and weight loss), and prescribes metformin, 500mg PO, twice a day, and lisinopril, 20 mg, PO, once a day. The metformin dose is gradually increased to 850 mg PO twice a day to meet the A1C goal.

The patient has some nausea and what he describes as "stomach upset," but the gastrointestinal distress subsides after three weeks of taking metformin. However, after three months of treatment, his fasting serum blood sugar is 189 mg/dL, and his A1C is 8.3%. Glipizide, 5 mg PO, once a day is started.

The patient rededicates himself to losing weight and exercising, and three months later, he has lost 12 kg. His fasting serum glucose is 140 mg/dL, and his HbA1C is 7.4%. The physician advises the patient that he has made good progress but that he needs to continue with the treatment regimen as there is a risk that his diabetes will worsen and that he is at risk for diabetic complications.

Case Study # 2: Samantha

A 58-year-old female with a PMH of T2DM and HTN is currently taking metformin. She is taking 1000 mg PO, twice a day, repaglinide 1 mg before each meal, and amlodipine. She visits her primary care physician to see the APRN for a checkup.

Results from Visit Six Months Ago:

  • BP 180/92
  • Fasting serum glucose: 183 mg/dL
  • HgA1C: 7.0%
  • Serum creatinine: 1.7 mg/dL
  • Urinary creatinine/albumin ratio: 28 mg/g Cr (Normal is < 30 mg/g Cr)

Results from Today’s Visit:

  • BP 172/88
  • Fasting serum glucose: 276 mg/dL
  • HgA1C: 8.9%
  • Serum creatinine: 2.3 mg/dL
  • Urinary creatinine/albumin ratio: 61 mg/g Cr 

There is no evidence on the physical exam or laboratory studies that the patient has retinopathy or neuropathy. The patient has not lost weight, and she admits that she is not 100% compliant with her medication regimen.

The APRN is concerned that the patient has not reached her glycemic goals after a year of therapy and that the patient has clinical evidence of diabetic nephropathy. He would like to prescribe insulin because he feels that the patient needs a more aggressive lowering of blood glucose and A1C, but he is worried that her compliance with self-injecting insulin will be very poor. The APRN advises the patient that she has evidence of kidney damage and is at risk for other complications.

The APRN arranges a consultation with a Certified Diabetes Educator and adjusts the anti-hypertensive regimen. The Educator sets up several intensive information/education sessions with the patient. The patient quickly learns self-injection techniques, but she is very reluctant to use insulin as she feels "it is just too complicated for her." The Educator arranges for frequent follow-up sessions that focus more on emotional support and encouragement than on technique. After three months of using basal and pre-prandial insulin, the patient's A1C is 7.4%, and her fasting glucose is 151 mg/dL.

Insulin

Available Forms & Dosing

Insulins are available as a parenteral preparation that is given as a subcutaneous (Sub-Q) injection. Some insulins can be given intravenously. Insulin is also available as an inhalation preparation.

The dosing of insulin is complex, and it varies depending on the patient and the type of insulin.

Mechanism of Action

Insulin is an endogenous hormone that is secreted by the pancreas. The primary effect of endogenous insulin is lowering blood glucose.

Glucose molecules cannot passively diffuse across cell membranes. These molecules must be actively transported. Insulin binds to insulin receptors on cell membranes, and the insulin-insulin receptor binding activates GLUT 4 insulin transport molecules inside the cell. These transport molecules, in turn, move glucose into the cells (Powers & D’ Alessio, 2023; Powers et al, 2022b).

Indications for Use

Insulin is used for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Patients who have T1DM should start insulin therapy at the time of diagnosis, and insulin therapy will need to be continued for the remainder of the patient's life (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Chang et al., 2021, Gabbay et al., 2023).

Other uses of insulin include treatment for calcium channel blocker overdose and as a treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis (Rietjens et al., 2023).

Insulin Categories: Onset, Duration of Action, Route of Administration, & Synthesis

Insulins are usefully categorized by their 1) Onset of action and duration of action, 2) Route of administration, and 3) Synthesis, i.e., how they are produced.

Onset of Action & Duration of Action

Onset and duration of action, parenteral insulins (Masharani, 2023):

  1. Rapid-acting: Onset of 0.25 to 0.5 hours and duration, 3 to 5 hours.
  2. Short-acting: Onset of 0.25 to 5 hours and duration, 4 to 12 hours (Longer for certain preparations).
  3. Intermediate-acting: Onset of 1 to 2 hours and duration, 14 to 24 hours.
  4. Long-acting: Onset of 1 to 6 hours and duration, 6 to > 24 hours.
  5. Combination products: Insulin combination products are a mixture of basal insulin and short-acting prandial insulin. Basal insulin is the level of endogenous insulin that is consistently in the blood to maintain blood sugar at normal levels during the day and sleep. Prandial insulin is the level of endogenous insulin that is secreted after a meal. The combination insulins provide an exogenous basal and prandial insulin in a single preparation. Some basal and prandial insulins can be mixed in the same syringe. Combination products are convenient for people who cannot do this (Masharani, 2023).
Table 1: Insulins
Rapid-acting
  • Aspart: Novolog®, Fiasp®
  • Glulisine: Apidra®
  • Lispro: Humalog®, Admelog®, Lyumjev®
Short-acting
  • Regular: Humulin R®, Novolin R®, Myxredlin®
Intermediate-acting
  • NPH: Humulin N®, Novolin N®
Long-acting
  • Detemir: Levemir®
  • Glargine: Basaglar®, Lantus®, Rezvoglar®, Semglee®, Toujeo®
  • Degludec: Tresiba®
Combination Insulins
  • Aspart protamine and aspart mixture: Novolog mix 70/30
  • Lispro protamine and lispro mixture: Humalog mix 75/25 and 50/50
  • NPH and regular mixture: Humulin mix 70/30, Novolin mix 70/30
Inhaled Insulin
  • Afrezza®

Afrezza® is a rapid-acting insulin, and it is used for post-prandial glucose control. Onset of action is ~ 12 minutes and the duration of action is 90 to 270 minutes, depending on the dose (Afrezza®, 2018).

Inhaled insulin appears to be less commonly used than parenteral insulin. Clinical studies have shown that it is safe. In fact, its adverse effect profile, compared to parenteral insulin, is good, and it provides good glucose control, fewer hypoglycemic shifts, and a more rapid onset and quicker return to baseline that rapid-acing insulin analogs (Heinemann & Parkin, 2018; Khan et al., 2022; Levin et al., 2021; McGill et al., 2020).

Route of Administration

Insulin can be given subcutaneously (Sub-Q), intravenously (IV), or it can be inhaled (Afrezza®, 2018; Frid et al., 2016; Elsayed et al., 2023):

  • Sub-Q is the recommended route of administration.
  • Regular insulin and insulin aspart can be given IV.
  • Inhaled insulin can be used for patients who have T1DM or T2DM and who do not have a chronic pulmonary disease like asthma or COPD or lung cancer.
  • Insulin should not be given intramuscularly (IM).
  • The rate of insulin absorption through a muscle is unpredictable (usually faster), and this causes poor and unpredictable glycemic control, and it increases the risk of hypoglycemia.
  • Insulin cannot be given orally because it is broken down by proteolytic enzymes in the GI tract, and this significantly reduces its bioavailability.

Synthesis

Animal-derived insulins are no longer produced in the United States and synthetic insulins, either recombinant human insulin or insulin analogs, are used exclusively.

Recombinant human insulin is produced by recombinant DNA technology, and it is identical to exogenous insulin (Sugumar et al., 2022). The first recombinant insulin was manufactured in 1983, Humulin®, i.e., human insulin (Sugumar et al., 2022).

Analog insulins are also manufactured using recombinant DNA technology, but they are not identical to endogenous insulin. Analog insulins are modified by adding free fatty acid chains to the parent molecule or by changing the sequence of amino acids of the insulin (Misra & Mathieu, 2018). These alterations result in a different pharmacokinetic profile of the drug, mostly by changing the Sub-Q tissue absorption of insulin (Misra & Mathieu, 2018). Because the absorption is changed, the onset and duration of action are changed, the baseline and post-prandial insulin levels more closely resemble normal insulin secretion patterns, and this has several advantages (Misra & Mathieu, 2018; Grunberger, 2014; Robard & Robard, 2020). Example: The rapid-acting analog insulin, lispro, is faster than human insulin to reach the capillary bed (Misra & Mathieu, 2018). Because of this, the onset of action is quicker so the lispro can be taken closer to a meal (Misra & Mathieu, 2018).

Analog insulins are the recommended choice for treating DM (Kim et al., 2023; Robard & Robard, 2020). Human insulins have variable onsets of action and variable peak actions (Sugumar et al., 2022).

It is important to notice that the rapid-acting and the long-acting insulins are divided into categories. These categories refer to specific changes in the composition of the insulins, changes that differentiate them from human insulin and influence their pharmacokinetic profile. Example: Insulin is made of two polypeptide chains that are comprised of amino acid residues, and the aspart insulin Novolog is made by changing the normal sequence of aspartic acid (an amino acid that is involved in protein synthesis) at a specific position in one of those chains and replacing it with proline (Masharani, 2023; Sugumar et al., 2022).

Warnings & Precautions

Hepatic Impairment

Insulin is cleared by the liver (Najjar & Perdomo, 2019). Hepatic impairment can reduce insulin clearance and cause insulin resistance (Puri & Kotwal, 2023). This puts patients at risk for hypoglycemia, and patients who have hepatic impairment may need their insulin dose adjusted (Puri & Kotwal, 2023).

Hypoglycemia

Many diabetic medications prevent blood glucose from becoming too high, but insulin, along with sulfonylureas and meglitinides, directly lowers blood glucose, and it can cause hypoglycemia.

Hypoglycemia is a relatively common adverse effect of an insulin therapy technique called intensive glycemic control (IGC) that was designed to maintain HgA1C within tight limits to prevent diabetic microvascular complications (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Fullerton et al., 2014). IGC does reduce the risk of these complications developing (ElSayed et al., 2023c).

Hypoglycemic episodes can be more than an inconvenience. The short-term and long-term consequences of hypoglycemia can be quite serious (Elsayed et al., 2023c). Hypoglycemic events are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and cognitive dysfunction, especially if a patient has frequent events, and severe hypoglycemia can cause coma, seizures, and death (ElSayed et al., 2023c; O’ Connell et al., 2021). The use of real-time continuous glucose monitors that have hypoglycemia alarms has helped to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia and maintain blood glucose within narrow levels (O’Connell et al., 2021).

Hypokalemia

Insulin affects the Na+/K+ ATPase enzyme that maintains the normal intracellular concentration of potassium. This increases the intracellular potassium level and can cause hypokalemia. Hypokalemia usually happens when insulin is given intravenously (Rietjens et al., 2023).

Renal Impairment

Renal impairment and chronic kidney disease (CKD) can significantly change glucose and insulin metabolism (de Boer et al, 2022; Galindo et al., 2020). These pathologies also interfere with the accuracy of HgA1C measurement, and they increase the risk of hypoglycemia (de Boer et al., 2022; Galindo et al., 2020). Unfortunately, the prescribing information for insulins and professional associations/authoritative associations do not have specific dosing adjustment guidelines for patients who have CKD or renal impairment. Examples:

  • The American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recommends that if a patient’s eGFR is < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, dosing adjustments may be necessary. For patients who have renal impairment, initiate and titrate insulin conservatively in order to avoid hypoglycemia (de Boer et al., 2022).
  • Regular Insulin: No specific dosage adjustments recommended in the manufacturer's labeling.
  • Inhaled Insulin: Renal impairment effects on Afrezza® has not been studied. It may be necessary to employ frequent glucose monitoring for those with renal impairment. Dose adjustment should be done as frequently as needed as well (Afrezza®, 2018).
  • Lantus: Kidney impairment effects on Lantus have not been studied. It may be necessary to employ frequent glucose monitoring for those with renal impairment. Dose adjustment should be done as frequently as needed as well (Lantus®, 2022).

Adverse Reactions

Lipodystrophy

Lipodystrophy is a fat tissue disorder and is a common adverse effect of insulin injections (Lombardo et al., 2022; Frid et al., 2016). There are two types of lipodystrophies caused by chronic insulin injections: lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy (Frid et al., 2016; Lombardo et al., 2022).

Lipohypertrophy is an accumulation of fat tissue at injection sites, and lipoatrophy is characterized by a depression/indentation and shrinking of the tissue at injection sites (Frid et al., 2016; Lombardo et al., 2022).

Lipohypertrophy is much more common than lipoatrophy (Wang et al., 2021). A meta-analysis by Wang et al. (2021) found that in patients who were chronic insulin users the prevalence of lipohypertrophy was 41.8% and the longer the duration of use, the greater the risk. A study done by Lombardo et al. (2022) followed 212 T1DM patients for three months, and the prevalence of lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy were 44.3% and 0.9%, respectively.

Lipohypertrophy can negatively affect the pharmacokinetics of insulin (Bochanen et al., 2022; Famulla et al., 2016; Lombardo et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2022). Lombardo et al. (2022) indicated that the patients who had lipohypertrophy demonstrated a decent difference in glycemic parameters when compared to individuals without lipohypertrophy. Famulla et al. (2016) found that insulin injected into lipohypertrophic tissue reduced insulin absorption and resulted in a postprandial blood glucose level that was ≥ 26% higher than when insulin was injected into normal adipose.

Other Injectable Diabetic Medications

Amylinomimetic: Pramlintide

Available Forms & Dosing

Pramlintide, trade name Symlin®, is the only amylinomimetic that is available in the United States.

Symlin is given by Sub-Q injection. It is given immediately before a major meal.

The manufacturer’s prescribing information states that there are no recommended dosing adjustments of Symlin® for patients who have hepatic impairment and that this clinical issue has not been studied (Symlin®, 2020).

The manufacturer’s prescribing information states that there are no recommended dosing adjustments of Symlin® for patients who have renal impairment, mild to severe, Clcr 15-29 mL/min (Symlin,® 2020). The use of Symlin® for patients who have end-stage renal disease has not been studied (Symlin,® 2020).

Mechanism of Action

Pramlintide is an injectable antidiabetic medication that is categorized as an amylinomimetic, and it is a synthetic analog of amylin. Amylin, also known as isle amyloid polypeptide, is a peptide hormone that is produced in the beta-cells of the pancreas, and it is co-secreted with insulin in response to glucose (Boyle et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019; Timmons et al., 2022).

Amylin decreases post-prandial glucose by (Timmons et al., 2022):

  1. Suppressing the release of glucagon
  2. Reducing hepatic glucose production
  3. Delaying gastric emptying
  4. Increasing post-prandial satiety

Pramlintide reduces post-prandial blood sugar levels in three ways:

  1. Prolongation of gastric emptying
  2. Reducing post-prandial glucagon secretion
  3. Reducing food intake by way of appetite suppression

Indications for Use

Amylin secretion is reduced in patients who have T1DM and T2DM (Boyle et al, 2022; Timmons et al., 2022). Pramlintide has a labeled use as an adjunctive treatment for patients who have T1DM or T2DM who use meal-time insulin but who do not have good glycemic control (Symlin®, 2020).

Contraindications

Pramlintide is contraindicated if a patient has hypoglycemia unawareness, and/or gastroparesis (Symlin®, 2020).

US Boxed Warning

Pramlintide and insulin are typically given together, immediately before a major meal, and current use of Symlin and insulin can cause severe hypoglycemia (Kleppinger & Vivian, 2003; Ryan et al., 2005; Symlin®, 2020). This typically happens two to three hours after Symlin is injected (Symlin®, 2020). This adverse effect can occur in patients who have T1DM or T2DM, but it is more likely to occur in type 1 diabetics (Symlin®, 2020; Kleppinger & Vivian, 2003; Ryan et al., 2005).

Pramlintide itself does not cause hypoglycemia, but because Symlin® and insulin taken together can cause severe hypoglycemia and pramlintide inhibits glucagon release, Symlin should not be prescribed for patients who have hypoglycemia unawareness (Symlin®, 2020).

The prescribing information for Symlin® recommends:

  1. Frequent monitoring of blood glucose
  2. Decreasing the mealtime insulin dose by 50% during the initial stages of treatment 

Note: Glucagon is a hormone that is produced in the pancreas. Glucagon increases blood sugar by stimulating/increasing hepatic glycogenolysis (breakdown of glycogen to glucose) and gluconeogenesis (formation of glucose from non-carbohydrates) (Katzung et al., 2019; Powers et al.,2022c). This process requires a sufficient store of hepatic glycogen in order to occur.

Warnings & Precautions

One concern is the issue of hypoglycemia, which has already been discussed.

Gastroparesis is a disease characterized by signs and symptoms of a gastric obstruction like abdominal distention, bloating, nausea, vomiting, and abnormal gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction (Jalleh et al., 2022; Papdakis & McPhee, 2023).

Diabetes itself can cause gastroparesis, and many diabetic patients have disordered gastric emptying (Jalleh et al., 2022; Papadakis & McPhee, 2023). Pramlintide slows gastric emptying, so it should not be prescribed for patients who have gastroparesis (Symlin®, 2020).

Pramlintide and insulin should not be mixed in the same syringe as this can change the pharmacokinetics of both drugs (Symlin®, 2020).

Pramlintide slows gastric emptying and if the effectiveness of an oral medication depends on the rapid onset of action, these drugs should be taken one hour before or two hours after a pramlintide injection (Symlin,®, 2020).

Adverse Effects

Adverse effects: ≥ 5% of patients experience anorexia, headache, nausea, and vomiting (Symlin®, 2020).

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Available Forms & Dosing

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are primarily injectables. There is one oral preparation. The GLP-1 receptor agonists that are currently available in the United States are listed below in Table 2.

Table 2: GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Available Forms
  • Dulaglutide (Trulicity®)
  • Exenatide (Byetta®)
  • Liraglutide (Saxenda®, Victoza®)
  • Lixisenatide (Adlyxin®)
  • Semaglutide (Ozempic®, Wegovy®)
  • Semaglutide, tablets (Rybelus®)

The parenteral GLP-1 receptor agonists should be injected subcutaneously, not IM or IV. They should not be mixed in the same syringe with insulin or other medications. Some of the GLP-1-receptor agonists are taken once a week, and some are immediate-release formulations and are taken every day.

Some but not all the GLP-1 receptor agonists have a recommendation in their prescribing information to either use the drug cautiously or do not use it if a patient has renal impairment and an eGFR below a specific level. Check the prescribing information for each drug before giving it. Use these medications cautiously in patients who have renal impairment and in patients who have risk factors for renal damage.

Mechanism of Action

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone that is secreted by the α cells of the pancreas, the colon, and the distal ileum (Chen et al., 2022). The incretin hormones GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP, which will be discussed later) stimulate insulin release in response to blood glucose after a meal. They also reduce the release of glucagon. The GLP-1 receptor agonists are analogs of the GLP-1 hormone, and they regulate blood sugar by (Chen et al., 2022; Katzung et al, 2019):

  1. Delaying gastric emptying
  2. Increasing satiety and reducing appetite
  3. Reducing the release of glucagon
  4. Promoting glucose-stimulated insulin release

Indications

People who have T2DM have a diminished level of incretin hormone activity, and the GLP-1 receptor agonists have a labeled use as a treatment for children ≥ 10 years old and adults who have T2DM as an adjunct to lifestyle changes to improve glycemic control (Karagiannis et al., 2022). The GLP-1 receptor agonists are typically used as a second-line drug, after metformin (Zhao et al., 2021).

In addition, the GLP-1 receptor agonists are recommended for diabetic patients who have cardiovascular disease (CVD) or who have risk factors for CVD (ElSayed, 2023b). The GLP-1 receptor agonists have been shown to reduce the risk for/incidence of serious CVD events like myocardial infarction, and they may help reduce the risk of renal diabetic complications (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Li et al, 2021; Viljoen & Bain, 2023).

The 2023 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Care noted that a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and/or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist with established cardiovascular disease benefit is recommended as part of the glucose-lowering regimen and comprehensive cardiovascular risk reduction for T2DM patients who have either of the following (ElSayed et al., 2023b):

  • Established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD)
  • Indicators of high cardiovascular risk
  • Established kidney disease
  • Established heart failure (HF)

Contraindications

Use of a GLP-1 receptor agonist is contraindicated if a patient has a family history or a personal history of medullary thyroid cancer or if a patient has multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. (See the US Boxed Warning and Warning/precautions sections for additional information).

The use of Byetta® (Exenatide) is contraindicated in patients who have a history of drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia caused by an exenatide product (Byetta, 2022). Serious, sometimes fatal, bleeding, from drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, has occurred with exenatide use (Byetta®, 2022). This is not a contraindication mentioned in the prescribing information of the other GLP-1 receptor agonists.

US Boxed Warning

The prescribing information for the GLP-1 receptor agonists states that the use of GLP-receptor agonists caused thyroid C-cell tumors in animals. The relevance of these studies, vis a vis the use of these drugs in humans, has not been determined, and it is not known if these drugs cause thyroid cancer in humans, but GLP-receptor agonists are contraindicated if a patient has a family history or a personal history of medullary thyroid cancer or if a patient has a history of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2.

The GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may or may not increase the risk of developing thyroid malignancy (Bezin et al., 2023; Frias et al., 2019). Thompson and Stürmer (2023) discovered that diabetes itself increases the risk (20% to 30%) for thyroid cancer, and GLP-1 RAs may cause a small increase in thyroid cancer risk.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 is a very rare inherited cancer. The GLP-1 receptor agonists’ prescribing information state that these drugs are contraindicated if a patient has this malignancy, but no more information is provided. No published information on the GLP-1 receptor agonists and this malignancy was located.

Warnings & Precautions

Acute gallbladder disease: The prescribing information for GLP-1 receptor agonists warns that these drugs have been associated with acute gallbladder disease, e.g., cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and an examination of cases from the US Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) adverse effect reporting system confirms this risk (He et al., 2022; Woronow et al., 2022). Specifically, He et al. (2022) found that using GLP-1 RAs increased risk of gallbladder or biliary diseases, especially when used:

  • At higher doses
  • For longer durations
  • For weight loss

Acute kidney injury: The GLP-1 receptor agonists have been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) and exacerbation of chronic renal failure (Dong & Sun, 2022; Seo, 2021). Most, but not all cases occurred in patients who had a risk factor for AKI like dehydration, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, the latter two being common adverse effects of these drugs (Dong & Sun, 2022; Yeo, 2021). Renal function should be monitored, especially if patients have a risk for factors for AKI or diabetic nephropathy (Dong & Sun, 2022; Yeo, 2021).

Diabetic retinopathy: The prescribing information for dulaglutide and semaglutide warns that these drugs have been associated with a risk of increasing diabetic retinopathy (DR) complications (Albert et al., 2023; Ozempic®, 2022; Trulicity.® (2022). The GLP-1 receptor agonists may have a direct effect on the retina, and a rapid improvement in glycemic control may cause a worsening of DR (Ozempic, 2022; Yoshida et al., 2022). Several recently published studies concluded that the cardio-protective GLP-1 receptor agonists, dulaglutide and semaglutide, are associated with a risk of exacerbation/worsening of DR (Albert et al., 2023; Yoshida et al., 2022). An ophthalmologist should be consulted before treatment with a GLP-1 receptor agonist is started (Albert et al., 2023).

Hypoglycemia: The GLP-1 receptor agonists do not, by themselves, cause hypoglycemia because these drugs stimulate insulin release in response to the blood glucose level (Powers et al, 2022c). However, the prescribing information of the GLP-1 receptor agonists warns that concurrent use of insulin or a sulfonylurea and a GLP-1 receptor agonist can cause hypoglycemia, and decreasing the dose of the insulin or the sulfonylurea should be considered (Li et al., 2021; Gallwitz, 2022). George et al. (2022) and Meyer et al. (2023) found that adding a GLP-1 receptor agonist to a patient’s medication regimen reduced the patient’s insulin requirements.

Pancreatitis: The prescribing information of the GLP-receptor agonists warns that during clinical trials, some patients developed pancreatitis. There is some evidence (albeit inconsistent) that incretin analogs cause a low-grade pancreatic inflammation (Suryadevara et al., 2022). Suryadevara et al. (2022) discussed that although there was some evidence, the RCTs did not distinguish pancreatic adverse events between the control patients and those receiving incretin. During therapy with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, it is prudent, and recommended, to monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis.

Severe Gastrointestinal Disease: The GLP-1 receptor agonists can cause delayed gastric emptying. In addition, these drugs should not be used in patients who have gastroparesis or severe gastrointestinal disease (Preda et al., 2023).

Adverse Effects

Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting are the most common adverse effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonists (Katzung et al., 2019; Viljoen & Bain, 2023). Nausea occurs in one in five patients, and diarrhea and vomiting in one in 10 patients (Viljoen & Bain, 2023).

GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Available Forms & Dosing

There is one GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist available, tirzepatide, trade name Mounjaro™.

Tirzepatide is given as an Sub-Q injection, a single injection every four weeks.

There are no dosing adjustments of Mounjaro™ required for a patient who has hepatic or renal impairment (Mounjaro™, 2022).

Mechanism of Action

Tirzepatide is a GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone, and it has metabolic and glucose-lowering effects that are like GLP-1. The mechanisms of action of tirzepatide are listed below (Bradley et al, 2022;  Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023):

  1. Insulin secretion and release in response to blood glucose after a meal.
  2. GLP-1 decreases glucagon secretion and GIP increases glucagon secretion.
  3. Delayed gastric emptying.
  4. Stimulation of GIP and GLP-1 receptors has an additive effect in terms of decreasing appetite, which often, in turn, decreases food intake.

Indications

Tirzepatide is used as a second-line antidiabetic drug for patients who have T2DM, as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control (Mounjaro™, 2022; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023).

US Boxed Warning

Tirzepatide causes thyroid C-cell tumors in rats. It is unknown whether Mounjaro™ causes thyroid C-cell tumors, including medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), in humans as the human relevance of tirzepatide-induced rodent thyroid C-cell tumors has not been determined.

Mounjaro™ is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of MTC or patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2) (Mounjaro™, 2022). Counsel patients regarding the potential risk of MTC and symptoms of thyroid tumors.

Contraindications

Tirzepatide is contraindicated if a patient has a family history of a personal history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (Mounjaro™, 2022).

The Mounjaro™ package insert states that tirzepatide has caused thyroid C-cell tumors in animals. The relevance of these studies, vis a vis the use of these drugs in humans, has not been determined, and it is not known if these drugs cause thyroid cancer in humans (Mounjaro™, 2022).

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 is a very rare inherited cancer. The Mounjaro™ package insert states that tirzepatide is contraindicated if a patient has this malignancy, but no more information is provided. No published information on tirzepatide and this malignancy was located.

Warnings & Precautions

Acute kidney injury: Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting are very common adverse effects of tirzepatide (Mishra et al., 2023; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023). Cases of acute kidney injury and worsening of chronic renal failure have been reported. Most of these occurred in patients who had developed diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and dehydration (Mounjaro™, 2022).

Diabetic retinopathy: Cases of diabetic retinopathy did occur during clinical trials of tirzepatide, but there were very few (< 0.2 of the patients) (Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023). The Mounjaro™ prescribing information notes that rapid improvement in glycemic control has been associated with a temporary worsening of diabetic retinopathy. This adverse effect was noted in the Diabetes and Complications Control Trial (DCCT) study (Ting et al., 2016). However, this study did not include tirzepatide.

Gallbladder disease: Gallbladder disease occurred during clinical trials of tirzepatide, but the number of cases of cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and hepatic steatosis was < 1.0% and the number of cases was often no more than what occurred in patients treated with a placebo (Mishra et al., 2023; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023; Mounjaro™, 2022).

Heart rate: The GI receptors have a direct effect on the cardiovascular system, and during the SURPASS 1 to SURPASS 5 clinical trials of tirzepatide, 4.6% to 10% of the patients had sinus tachycardia (heart rate of ≥ 15 beats above baseline) compared to 4.3% of the patients who were given a placebo (Gallwitz, 2022; Mori et al., 2020). The clinical significance of this is not known (Mounjaro™, 2022).

Hypoglycemia: Tirzepatide by itself does not cause hypoglycemia. However, concurrent use of tirzepatide and insulin or an insulin secretagogue like a sulfonylurea may increase the risk of hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia, and the insulin/secretagogue dose may need to be reduced (Bradley et al., 2022; Mounjaro™, 2022). Hypoglycemia was noted as an adverse effect during the clinical trials of tirzepatide, but it was an uncommon adverse effect, it was seldom clinically significant, and there were only a few cases of severe hypoglycemia that required treatment (Karagiannis et al., 2022; Mishra et al., 2023).

Pancreatitis: Cases of pancreatitis and elevated lipase levels have been associated with the use of tirzepatide (Mishara et al., 2023; Mounjaro™, 2022; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023). Patients should be monitored for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis.

Severe Gastrointestinal Disease: Tirzepatide can cause GI adverse effects, and it delays gastric emptying. The prescribing information for Mounjaro™ recommends that it should not be used in patients who have severe GI disease, including gastroparesis.

Oral Diabetic Medications

Introduction

The ADA recommends that pharmacotherapy should be started when the patient is first diagnosed with T2DM unless there are contraindications (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Metformin is the primary drug of choice for patients who have T2DM, and it is very effective. However, T2DM is a progressive disease, and many T2DM patients will eventually need one or more second-line/third-line drugs to maintain glycemic control (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Combination treatment, i.e., metformin and another diabetic medication, is often used when a patient’s HgA1C is ≥ 1.5% of the desired level (ElSayed et al., 2023b). There have been few direct, head-to-head comparisons of oral diabetic medications in terms of efficacy and their advantages and disadvantages (Garber et al., 2018). The use of the other diabetic medications after metformin therapy has begun should be determined by these factors (ElSayed et al., 2023b):

  1. Patient preference.
  2. Cost of the drug.
  3. Access to the drug.
  4. The patient’s comorbidities, particularly the presence of or risk for atherosclerotic vascular disease, CKD, and heart failure.
  5. The adverse effect profile of the drug, e.g., the risk of hypoglycemia, and weight gain.
  6. The level of the patient’s glycemic control and the therapeutic goals. 

Examples: The sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors and the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have a protective effect against the progression of CKD and they have a cardiovascular disease benefit, so these would be the drugs of choice for patients who have T2DM and who have or are at risk for these diseases (ElSayed et al, 2023b). If weight control is a concern, the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist semaglutide or the GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide would be recommended (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Because T2DM is a progressive disease, oral diabetic medications may, eventually, be insufficient for maintaining glucose control and many T2DM patients will eventually need insulin (ElSayed et al., 2023b). In addition, insulin therapy is considered when HgA1C levels are > 10% [86 mmol/mol] or blood glucose levels are ≥ 300 mg/dL [16.7 mmol/L]) (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Note: Insulin resistance (IR) is one of the primary metabolic derangements of T2DM, and some oral diabetic medications help maintain glycemic control by their effects on IR. Insulin resistance is the decreased ability of insulin to act on target tissues, i.e., a decreased glucose uptake (Brutsaert, 2022; Powers et al., 2022b). Insulin resistance occurs in peripheral tissues, and it occurs in the liver, as well (Power et al., 2022b). In the liver, IR prevents insulin from inhibiting the liver from gluconeogenesis, the process of producing glucose (Power et al., 2022b).

Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors

Note: There is very little recent (past five years) published information on the clinical aspects of using acarbose, e.g., dosing adjustment for patients who have renal impairment, warning, and precautions.

Available Forms & Dosing

Acarbose is the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (α-glucosidase inhibitor) that is available. It is available in generic form, 25 mg and 50 mg tablets. Brand name formulations of acarbose were discontinued.

Acarbose is given three times a day, the maximum daily dose is 300 mg.

Mechanism of Action

The α-glucosidase inhibitors help control blood glucose by delaying glucose absorption in the gut and decreasing post-prandial hyperglycemia (Chiasson et al., 2002).

Indications

Adult patients who have T2DM, as an adjunctive treatment, along with diet and exercise, to improve glycemic control.

The α-glucosidase inhibitors are not included in the ADA’s 2023 Standards of Care list of glucose-lowering medications used for patients who have T2DM (ElSayed et al., 2023b). In the 2023 Standards, section 3 “Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities”, it is mentioned that there is evidence that α-glucosidase inhibitors can lower the incidence of diabetes within specific populations (Chiasson et al., 2002; Gerstein et al., 2020; Holman et al., 2017; Moelands et al., 2018; Elsayed et al., 2023d).

Contraindications

Acarbose is contraindicated if a patient has any of the following conditions (Chiasson et al, 2002; Gerstein et al., 2020):

  • Cirrhosis (see the Warnings & Precautions section)
  • A chronic GI disease associated with disorders of absorption or digestion
  • Colonic ulceration
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Partial intestinal obstruction
  • A predisposition to intestinal obstruction
  • A condition that would deteriorate if the patient had increased gas formation

Warnings & Precautions

Elevated serum transaminases: If a patient has hepatic impairment, use acarbose cautiously and if the patient’s serum transaminases become elevated, reduce the dose, or stop the use of the drug. Acarbose can cause transaminase elevations > 3 times the upper limit of normal, but this adverse effect is dose-related, it typically resolves without treatment, no liver injury occurs, and patients are not symptomatic (Liver Tox, 2021). However, cases of fulminant, acute, hepatitis-like liver injury have been associated with acarbose, and fatalities have been reported. This is a rare occurrence (LiverTox, 2021).

Hypoglycemia: Concurrent use of acarbose and insulin, metformin, or sulfonylurea may cause hypoglycemia (Gerstein et al., 2020). Consider reducing the dose of the other drugs.

Renal impairment: Acarbose is not recommended for patients who have significant renal impairment (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dl or CrCl < 25 mL/minute/1.73m2).

The 2023 ADA Standards of Care/Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management does not mention the α-glucosidase inhibitors (ElSayed et al., 2023d).

Hahr et al. (2022) indicated that when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is reduced, the serum level of acarbose and its metabolites are significantly elevated, and the authors recommend that acarbose not be given to patients who have a GFR < 26/mL/minute/1.73m2.

Dietary issues: A diet that is high in sucrose can cause GI side effects like bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, and loose stools. These GI problems are common side effects of acarbose, and sucrose may worsen them.

Adverse Effects

Abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence are common adverse effects of acarbose, and GI complaints could exacerbate the conditions listed above.

Biguanides

Available Forms & Dosing

Metformin is the only biguanide that is available in the United States.

Metformin is available as immediate-release (IR) oral tablets and extended-release (XR) tablets. It is also available as an oral solution and suspension.

Combination products are also available:

  1. Metformin and a sulfonylurea (glipizide)
  2. Metformin and a thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone)
  3. Metformin and an SGLT2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin)

Metformin XR is slowly absorbed, it produces a therapeutic level of the drug over a 12 to 24-hour period, and this means that metformin XR needs only to be taken once per day (Akram, 2021).

Lactate is metabolized in the liver, hepatic impairment can cause an accumulation of lactate, and metformin itself, in some situations, can increase serum lactate (Chidiac et al., 2022). It is recommended to decrease the metformin dose for patients who have documented hepatic impairment, if hepatic impairment occurs, or if the patient develops metformin-induced liver damage. Metformin-induced liver damage has been reported, but, fortunately, it is a rare occurrence (LiverTox, 2020).

Metformin is excreted in the urine, renal impairment is a risk factor for serious complications (See the sections, US Boxed Warning and Warnings & Precautions), and metformin should not be used if a patient’s eGFR is < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2.

Mechanism of Action

Metformin maintains glycemic control and lowers basal and post-prandial glucose by (Akram, 2021; Katzung et al., 2019):

  • Improving insulin sensitivity
  • Decreasing intestinal absorption of glucose
  • Decreasing hepatic glucose production

Metformin does not cause hypoglycemia (Katzung, 2019). Hypoglycemia associated with metformin has occurred, but these cases involved an overdose of the drug, drug-drug interactions, fasting, the presence of lactic acidosis, sustained physical exercise, and other specific, contributing causes (Akram, 2021; Al-Abri et al., 2013; Aldobeaban et al., 2018; DiMauro et al., 2022; Juneja et al., 2022).

Indications

Metformin is used to treat patients who have T2DM and who cannot control their blood sugar with diet and exercise alone. Metformin is typically the first medication used to treat T2DM (Di Mauro et al., 2022; ElSayed et al, 2023b). The 2023 ADA Standards, Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment states that metformin is safe and effective as well as inexpensive (ElSayed et al, 2023b). In addition, it may reduce risk of cardiovascular events and death (ElSayed et al, 2023b). Compared with sulfonylureas, metformin, when used as first-line therapy, has had beneficial effects on a patient’s HgA1C, weight, and cardiovascular mortality (ElSayed et al, 2023b).

Contraindications

Contraindications for metformin include severe renal dysfunction (eGFR < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2), acute or chronic metabolic acidosis with/without coma, and diabetic ketoacidosis.

Metformin is cleared by renal filtration and excreted in the urine, approximately 90% of the drug is eliminated by the kidneys, and the use of metformin in patients who have severe kidney disease can cause metformin-associated lactic acidosis, aka MALA (ElSayed et al, 2023b; Hai et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019; Rahman & Tuba, 2022; Thammavaranucupt et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022). The risk of developing MALA is the rationale for these contraindications.

US Boxed Warning

Metformin can cause lactic acidosis with blood lactate levels > 5 mmol/L, and MALA can cause resistant bradyarrhythmias, hypotension, hypothermia, and death. The onset of MALA is subtle, and the signs and symptoms are non-specific. Factors that increase the risk of developing MALA include (ElSayed et al, 2023b; Hai et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019; Rahman & Tuba, 2022; Thammavaranucupt et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022):

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Alcohol abuse
  • An acute hypoxic state like CHF
  • Concurrent use of certain drugs
  • Hepatic impairment
  • Renal impairment
  • Surgery
  • Undergoing a radiological study that uses contrast media

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis is a rare complication of metformin but is a potentially deadly pathology with a mortality rate of up to 50% (Thammavaranucupt et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022; ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis, or MALA, is defined as (Chidiac et al., 2022; Rahman & Tuba, 2022):

  • Arterial pH < 7.35
  • Serum lactate level > 5 mmol/L
  • Exposure to metformin  

The signs and symptoms of MALA are non-specific and include (but are not limited to) (Chidiac et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022):

  • Agitation
  • Coma
  • Confusion
  • Hypotension
  • Lethargy
  • Metabolic acidosis
  • Seizures
  • Tachycardia

Factors that increase the risk of developing MALA include the following (Chidiac et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019, Kuno et al., 2023; Lewis et al., 2015; Rahman & Tuba, 2022; Thammavaranucupt et al., 2022; Hai et al., 2022; Juneja et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019; Rai et al., 2020).

  • A high blood level of metformin: A high blood metformin level increases the cellular production of lactate. This can occur after an acute overdose or when there is a condition that decreases the excretion of metformin.
  • Hepatic impairment/renal impairment: Hepatic impairment decreases the metabolism of lactate, potentially causing an accumulation of lactate and increasing the risk of developing MALA. Alcohol abuse and hepatic impairment are risk factors for MALA.
  • Renal impairment: Renal impairment decreases the excretion of metformin, and it is an important risk factor for MALA. It is important to remember that MALA can develop in patients who have acute renal impairment caused by dehydration, diarrhea, and/or vomiting.
  • Tissue hypoxia: Any condition that causes tissue hypoxia and can cause anaerobic glycolysis can increase the serum lactate level and increase the risk of developing MALA, including (but not limited to) acute myocardial infarction, a chronic lung disease with hypoxia, CHF, dehydration, diabetic ketoacidosis, heart disease, sepsis, shock, and recent surgery.

Warnings & Precautions

Bariatric surgery: The absorption of XR metformin tablets may be decreased in patients who have had gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy, and in these situations, it has been advised to use IR tablets. Also, decreased absorption could be problematic if a patient has impaired renal function. The most current information on this topic is from 2018. Deden et al. (2018) measured plasma lactate levels in patients taking or not taking metformin who had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (Deden et al., 2018). The levels were done before and after the surgery, and the authors concluded that if a normal renal function was preserved, there was no need to decrease the metformin dose after an uncomplicated Roux-en-Y procedure (Deden et al., 2018).

The ADA Standards of Care 2023 advises that metformin should not be given on the day of a surgical procedure (ElSayed et al., 2023e).

Iodinated contrast: Iodinated contrast can cause acute kidney injury (AKI). The metformin package inserts states that it should be withheld for patients undergoing any radiological study in which intravenous iodinated contrast media is being utilized because of the risk of resulting acute kidney injury that would lead to a buildup of metformin, and ultimately a clinical result of lactic acid accumulation (ACR, 2023).

The American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media 2023 Manual of Contrast Media includes guidelines for the management of patients taking metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023e):

  1. Those taking metformin are not at higher risk for post-contrast acute kidney injury (AKI) when compared to other patients not taking metformin.
  2. A potential concern for furthering renal damage in patients with AKI, stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease (CKD), or stage 5 severe CKD.
  3. In patients who have been properly selected to receive metformin administration, there have been no reports of lactic acidosis following intravenous iodinated contrast medium administration.
  4. The ACR Committee recommends that patients taking metformin are classified into one of two categories based on the patient’s renal function (as measured by eGFR):
    1. Category I: In those with no evidence of AKI and with eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m2, it is not necessary to discontinue metformin either before or following the intravenous administration of iodinated contrast media. It is also not necessary to reassess the patient’s renal function following the test or procedure.
    2. Category II: In those taking metformin who are known to have acute kidney injury or severe CKD (stage 4 or 5; i.e., eGFR< 30), or are undergoing arterial catheter studies that might result in emboli (atheromatous or other) to the renal arteries, metformin should be held temporarily at the time of or before the procedure and continued to be withheld for 48 hours after the procedure. It is recommended that it is reinstituted only after renal function has been re-evaluated and found to be normal.
  5. Metformin and Gadolinium: It has been deemed unnecessary to stop metformin before a contrast medium administration in the event that the amount of gadolinium-based contrast material administered is in the usual dose range. The usual dose range is 0.1 to 0.3 mmol per kilogram of body weight.
  6. Hepatic and renal impairment: Metformin should be used cautiously in patients who have renal impairment, and the dose of metformin should be adjusted (decreased) in patients who have renal impairment. These issues were discussed in the available forms and dosing section and the US Boxed Warning section.

Adverse Effects

Occurring in approximately 30% of patients, common adverse effects of metformin include (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Katzung et al., 2019; Rahman & Tuba, 2022):

  • Abdominal discomfort
  • Bloating
  • Diarrhea
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting 

The use of metformin has been associated with vitamin B12 deficiency, especially long-term use of the drug and (possibly) with higher doses (ElSayed et al., 2023d; Khattab et al., 2022). This adverse effect has been associated with an increased risk of developing diabetic foot ulcers and causing or worsening distal symmetrical, autonomic, and cardiac neuropathy (Bell, 2022; Karakousis et al., 2022).

The ADA’s 2023 Standards of Care recommends considering the periodic measurement of B12, especially in patients who have anemia. We know that anemia may increase the loss of B12 from the liver (Bell, 2022; ElSayed et al., 2023e). It is reasonable to presume that patients who have peripheral neuropathy require B12 level monitoring because many diabetics have peripheral neuropathy, and it would be important know if a low B12 level is contributing to a patient’s signs and symptoms (Bell, 2022; ElSayed et al., 2023e).

Regarding the “when” and “how often” to monitor B12 levels, the ADA 2023 Standards of Care indicates that even though there are not formal recommendations for periodicity of monitoring, it is important to note that the lowering effect of metformin on vitamin B12 has been shown to increase with time (ElSayed, 2023d).

Bile Acid Sequestrants

Available Forms & Dosing

Colesevelam is available as a generic and as a brand name formulation, as Welchol® tablets, and as an oral suspension.

Mechanism of Action

The mechanism by which colesevelam lowers blood glucose has not been identified (Welchol,® 2022).

Indications

Glycemic control for patients who have type 2 diabetes, as an adjunct to diet and exercise (Welchol®, 2022). The ADA 2023 Standards of Care do not mention colesevelam.

Contraindications

There are three contraindications for the use of colesevelam (Welchol®, 2022; Esan et al., 2022; Grundy et al., 2019):

  1. Serum triglyceride level > 500 mg/dL: Colesevelam can increase serum triglyceride levels, and hypertriglyceridemia can cause pancreatitis.
  2. A history of pancreatitis that was hypertriglyceridemia-induced.
  3. A history of bowel obstruction or gastroparesis: Colesevelam can cause bowel obstruction, and constipation is a relatively common adverse effect of the drug, occurring in > 11% of patients.

Warnings & Precautions

Colesevelam can increase serum triglycerides, and a high serum triglyceride level can cause pancreatitis (Welchol®, 2022). Patients who have signs and symptoms of pancreatitis should discontinue the use of the drug.

Colesevelam can cause bowel obstruction, and its use is not recommended for patients who have gastroparesis, patients who may be at risk for a bowel obstruction, or patients who have had major gastrointestinal surgery (Welchol®, 2022).

Colesevelam lowers bile acid concentration, and bile acids are required for the absorption of the fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K require bile acids (Esan et al., 2022). During the licensing studies of colesevelam, the levels of vitamins A, D, and E were not affected, and the level of vitamin K (assessed indirectly by measuring PT and PTT) was not affected (Esan et al., 2022). However, the prescribing information recommends states that colesevelam may (italics added) decrease the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, and patients who are at risk for vitamin K deficiency (malabsorption syndrome, patients taking warfarin) or who have/are at risk of a vitamin A, D, or E deficiency may be at risk for this adverse effect (Welchol®, 2022). Oral vitamin supplements should be taken at least four hours before taking colesevelam and vitamin supplementation should be considered for patients who will be taking the drug for a long time (Esan et al., 2022; Welchol®, 2022).

Adverse Effects

Common effects of colesevelam include constipation, dyspepsia, and nausea (Welchol®, 2022).

Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPP-4) Inhibitors

Available Forms & Dosing

There are four DPP-4 inhibitors available in the United States: 

  1. Alogliptin (Nesina®)
  2. Linagliptin (Tradjenta®)
  3. Saxagliptin (Onglyza®)
  4. Sitagliptin (Januvia®)

All four of these medications are available in tablet form. They are to be taken once a day.

The DPP-4 inhibitors are also combined with metformin, an SGLT-2 inhibitor, metformin and an SGLT-2 inhibitor, and with a thiazolidinedione.

Hepatic impairment: The prescribing information for Tradjenta® states that dosing adjustments of the drug do not need to be made for patients who have hepatic impairment (Tradjenta®, 2022).

The prescribing information for Januvia® and Onglyza® does not mention the issue.

The prescribing information for Nesina® states that dosing adjustments of the drug do not need to be made for patients who have mild to moderate liver impairment, the drug has not been studied in patients who have severe hepatic impairment, and Nesina® should be used cautiously in patients who have liver disease.

Renal impairment: The prescribing information for Onglyza®, Januvia®, and Nesina® recommends decreasing the dose in patients who have renal impairment.

Linagliptin is primarily eliminated by the enterohepatic system, and the prescribing information for Tradjenta® does not recommend decreasing the dose for patients who have renal impairment (Florentin et al., 2022).

Mechanism of Action

The DPP-4 inhibitors inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), and DPP-4 is an enzyme that degrades GLP-1 and other incretins like GIP (Florentin et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019).

Glucagon-like peptide-1 is an incretin hormone that is secreted by the α cells of the pancreas, the colon, and the distal ileum (Chen et al., 2022). Glucagon-like peptide-1 stimulates insulin release in response to blood glucose after a meal. It also reduces the release of glucagon. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone, and it has metabolic and glucose-lowering effects that are like GLP-1. Inhibition of DPP-4 increases/maintains the levels of these incretin hormones. This is the mechanism by which the DPP-4 inhibitors control blood glucose levels.

Indications

The DPP-4 inhibitors are used for patients who have T2DM, along with diet and exercise, to maintain glycemic control (ElSayed et al., 2023b). The DPP-4 inhibitors are typically used as a second-line/third-line medication, in addition to metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Florentin et al., 2022).

Contraindications

There are no specific contraindications for the use of the DPP-4 inhibitors.

Warnings & Precautions

Arthralgia: In 2015 the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning about the DPP-IV inhibitors and the risk of severe arthralgia (Wang et al., 2019). Subsequent research has found that patients taking a DPP-4 inhibitor – any of the four – had a higher risk of developing arthralgia, but the risk decreased in long-time users (Wang et al., 2019). The prescribing information notes that when the use of the drug is stopped, the symptoms are resolved (Januvia®, 2022; Ni et al., 2022; Onglyza®, 2019).

Bullous pemphigoid: The prescribing information for all four DPP-4 inhibitors states in the post-marketing period, cases of bullous pemphigoid that required hospitalization developed in patients taking a DPP-4 inhibitor. Bullous pemphigoid is an auto-immune disease that usually occurs in the elderly (Roy, et al., 2021; Yancey et al., 2022). It is characterized by blistering skin lesions that usually develop on the lower abdomen, the groin, the flexor surfaces of the extremities and occasionally on the oral mucosa, and the patient may have severe pruritus (Roy, et al., 2021; Yancey et al., 2022). The use of DPP-4 inhibitors significantly increases the risk of developing bullous pemphigoid (Roy et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). The onset can be delayed by many months (Kridin & Bergman, 2018). Most patients do well when the use of the drug is stopped, but serious complications can happen (Kridin & Bergman, 2018). If a patient has signs and symptoms of bullous pemphigoid, the use of the DPP-4 inhibitor should be stopped immediately.

Heart failure: The prescribing information for all four DPP-IV inhibitors states that cases of heart failure have been associated with the use of these drugs, and the DPP-4 inhibitors should be used cautiously for patients who have a history of heart failure or who have a risk of developing heart failure. This warning is based on clinical trials that involved patients who had poor glycemic control and had atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) or had risk factors for ASCVD (Florentin et al., 2022). Recent reviews of the literature concluded that saxagliptin was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, and linagliptin was not (Florentin et al., 2022; Mannucci et al., 2021). Mannucci et al. (2021) did conclude that, as a class, DPP-4s are not associated with any increase nor reduction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), mortality, and heart failure (HF) (Mannucci et al., 2021).

Hypoglycemia: Concurrent use of a DPP-4 inhibitor and insulin or a sulfonylurea increases the incidence of hypoglycemia (Januvia®, 2022; Ni et al., 2022; Onglyza®, 2019). Consider decreasing the dose of the insulin or the sulfonylurea as needed to prevent this.

Pancreatitis: The prescribing information for all four DPP-4 inhibitors states that during clinical trials and in post-marketing experience, cases of acute and fatal pancreatitis were reported. The prescribing information also states that it is not known if patients who have a history of pancreatitis are at risk for developing this adverse effect. If a patient taking a DPP-4 inhibitor develops signs and symptoms of pancreatic damage, use of the drug should be discontinued (Januvia®, 2022).

A recent (2020) review of the literature stated that the available data do not currently support an association of DPP-4 treatment with pancreatitis nor pancreatic cancer (Dicembrini et al., 2020). Yang et al. wrote that there is no consensus on DPP-4s pancreatic safety (Yang et al., 2022).

Adverse Effects

Common adverse effects of the DPP-4 inhibitors are:

  • Cough: Linagliptin.
  • Diarrhea: Linagliptin.
  • Headache: Alogliptin, saxagliptin.
  • Nasopharyngitis: Linagliptin, sitagliptin.
  • Urinary tract infection: Alogliptin, saxagliptin.
  • Upper respiratory tract infection: Alogliptin, saxagliptin.

Meglinitide Analogs

Available Forms & Dosing

Nateglinide and repaglinide come in oral tablets. The brand name formulations of these drugs were discontinued.

Nateglinide and repaglinide are taken orally, three times a day, before meals (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).

Mechanism of Action

The meglitinide analogs increase the release of endogenous insulin from the pancreas (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b). Nateglinide and repaglinide act by closing ATP-dependent potassium channels on pancreatic beta-cell membranes, the beta-cells are depolarized, and calcium moves into the cells, stimulating insulin release (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).

Indications

Nateglinide and repaglinide are used to treat patients who have T2DM and who do not have adequate glycemic control using diet and exercise (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b). The meglitinide analogs are second and third-line drugs (DeMarsilis et al., 2022). The ADA 2023 Standards of Care does not mention nateglinide or repaglinide in the section Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment (ElSayed et al., 2023e).

Contraindications

There are no specific contraindications to the use of nateglinide.

Concurrent use of repaglinide and a strong CYP2C8 inhibitor like gemfibrozil (Lopid®) can significantly increase the serum concentration of repaglinide and cause hypoglycemia. The combination of these drugs is contraindicated.

Warnings & Precautions

Bariatric surgery: A meglitinide should not be given during the immediate postoperative period to a patient who has had bariatric surgery (Mechanick et al., 2019).

Hypoglycemia: The meglitinide analogs, like insulin and sulfonylureas, directly lower blood glucose by stimulating endogenous insulin secretion, and hypoglycemia is a common adverse effect of these drugs, occurring more often with the use of repaglinide (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b; DeMarsilis et al., 2022; Powers et al., 2023).

Renal impairment: Both nateglinide and repaglinide can be used for patients who have renal impairment, but dosing adjustments need to be made, based on a patient's eGFR (LeRoith et al., 2019).

Weight gain: Both nateglinide and repaglinide can cause weight gain (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).

Adverse Effects

The most common adverse effects of nateglinide and repaglinide (aside from hypoglycemia) are headache (repaglinide) and upper respiratory tract infection (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).

Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter Type 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2 Inhibitors)

Available Forms & Dosing

The Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are available in tablet form. There are currently four SGLT2 available:

  • Canagliflozin (Invokana®)
  • Dapagliflozin (Farxiga®)
  • Empagliflozin (Jardiance®)
  • Ertugliflozin (Steglatro®). 

The SGLT2 inhibitors are also available as a combination product with metformin or a DPP-IV inhibitor.

The SGLT2 inhibitors are oral preparations, and they are taken once a day.

Dosing adjustment may be needed if the patient has hepatic impairment.

Dosing adjustment may be needed, or the use of the SGLT2 inhibitor may be contraindicated if the patient has end-stage renal disease (Farxiga,® 2023; Invokana®, 2022). Dosing adjustments for patients who have renal impairment are complex and specific to each drug. Check the prescribing information for details.

Mechanism of Action

Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 is a glucose transporter found in the renal tubules, and SGLT2 reabsorbs a significant amount of filtered glucose from the proximal tubules. Inhibition of SGLT2 increases the renal excretion of glucose and lowers plasma glucose (Katzung et al., 2019).

Indications

There are four indications for the use of the SGLT2 inhibitors (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Farxiga,® 2023; Invokana,® 2022):

  1. As an adjunct to diet and exercise, to attain glycemic control for patients who have T2DM.
  2. To reduce the risk of major cardiac events in patients who have T2DM and who have cardiac disease.
  3. To reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients who have T2DM and CKD or T2DM and heart failure.
  4. To reduce the risk of increased serum creatinine and the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

The SGLT2 inhibitors are antidiabetic drugs, but they also have beneficial cardiovascular and renal effects (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Vallon & Verma, 2021). These beneficial effects include their ability to lower the GFR, improve cardiac function, and reduce the risk of heart failure (Vallon & Verma, 2021).

The ADA’s 2023 Standards of Care, Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment section indicates that individuals with T2DM who have established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, indicators of high cardiovascular risk, established kidney disease, or heart failure, a SGLT2 and/or GLP-1 receptor agonist with demonstrated cardiovascular disease benefit is recommended as a part of the glucose-lowering regimen (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Contraindications

The SGLT2 inhibitors are contraindicated for patients on hemodialysis (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022).

Warnings & Precautions

Genital mycotic infections: The use of an SGLT2 inhibitor increases the risk of developing a genital mycotic infection, in females and males, and the incidence has been reported to be > 3% and sometimes > 12% (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022). A previous history of a genital mycotic infection increases the risk of developing this adverse effect.

Hypoglycemia: Concurrent use of an SGLT2 inhibitor and insulin or a sulfonylurea may cause hypoglycemia (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022). Hypoglycemia is not an adverse effect of the SGLT2 inhibitors by themselves.

Ketoacidosis: Cases of ketoacidosis have been reported during clinical trials of the SGLT2 inhibitors, and there have been after-market reports of this adverse effect, as well (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022). Many of these cases were patients who had euglycemic DKA (blood glucose < 250 mg/dL, arterial pH < 7.3, serum bicarbonate < 18 mEq/L, and ketonemia), and recent research has confirmed that the use of the SGLT2 inhibitors significantly increases the risk of developing euglycemic DKA (Wojtas et al., 2023).

Lower limb amputation and fractures: The prescribing information for the SGLT2 inhibitors warns that their use has been associated with a risk of lower limb amputation and fractures. A recent (2022) literature review concluded that those with T2DM and CKD are at elevated risk of amputation and fracture (Arnott et al., 2022). Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors does not increase the risk of amputation or fracture overall (Arnott et al., 2022). The available data make it unlikely that canagliflozin, or SGLT2 inhibitors more broadly, increase the risk of amputation or fracture either overall or in any specific population subset (Arnott et al., 2022).

Necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum: Necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum, aka Fournier’s gangrene, is an infection of the fascial tissues in the perineum (Jahir et al., 2022; Kasbawala et al. 2020). It is highly progressive, and it can cause sepsis, shock, and multi-organ system failure (Jahir et al., 2022; Kasbawala et al. 2020). Fournier’s gangrene in these cases is likely caused by an increased urinary glucose concentration (Jahir et al., 2022). Necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum is a rare adverse effect of SGLT2 inhibitors: From 2013 to 2020, 491 cases were reported to the FDA, and a mortality rate of 88% was reported (Tran et al., 2022).

Urosepsis: The use of SGLT2 inhibitors increases the risk of urinary tract infections, and pyelonephritis and urosepsis can occur, as well (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022). This warning is from the prescribing information of these drugs, and the level of risk for these complications and whether the use of SGLT2 inhibitors does increase the risk is a controversial and unresolved issue (Dave et al., 2019; Tada et al., 2022). However, patients who have diabetes are at risk for urinary tract infections and for having complications with a urinary tract infection (Dave et al., 2019). Urosepsis and pyelonephritis are important causes of mortality in this patient population (Dave et al., 2019). Given that, patients who are taking an SGLT2 inhibitor should be monitored for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections.

Volume depletion: The SGLT2 inhibitors can cause volume depletion, and because of the patient population that takes SGLT2 inhibitors, this adverse effect can cause acute kidney injury (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022).

Adverse Effects

Common adverse effects of the SGLT2 inhibitors are an increased incidence of genital infections and urinary tract infections (Katzung et al., 2019).

Sulfonylureas

Available Forms & Dosing

The sulfonylureas that are currently available include:

  1. Glimepiride (Amaryl®)
  2. Glipizide (Glucotrol XL®)
  3. Glyburide (Glynase®)

All three medications are available as generics. The sulfonylureas are also available as a combination product with metformin.

The sulfonylureas are oral tablets, and they are taken once a day.

The prescribing information for the sulfonylureas does not have dosing recommendations for glimepiride, glipizide, and glyburide for patients who have hepatic impairment.

The prescribing information for the sulfonylureas does not have dosing recommendations for glimepiride, glipizide, and glyburide for patients who have renal impairment.

Hahr and Molitch (2022) stated that as GFR decreases, the clearance of sulfonylureas and their metabolites decrease, and this increases the risk of hypoglycemia. According to the authors, this is not an issue with glipizide, and no dosing adjustments of glipizide are needed for patients that have renal impairment. Dosing adjustments of glimepiride and glyburide should be made if the patient has a low eGFR (Hahr & Molitch, 2022).

Mechanism of Action

The sulfonylureas stimulate the release of endogenous insulin (Amaryl®, 2018; Katzung et al., 2019; Powers & D’Alessio, 2023). The sulfonylureas bind to sulfonylurea receptor sites on the beta-cells of the pancreas, which closes ATP-sensitive potassium channels, the beta-cells depolarize and insulin is released (Amaryl®; Costello et al., 2023, Powers & D’Alessio, 2023). The sulfonylureas also increase insulin sensitivity and change glucose metabolism in the liver (Costello et al., 2023).

Indications

The sulfonylureas are used to treat patients who have T2DM and who have not attained optimal glycemic control with diet and exercise (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). Sulfonylureas are a commonly used second-line drug, used in combination with metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Contraindications

Glyburide is contraindicated for patients who have diabetic ketoacidosis or T1DM.

Concurrent use of glyburide and bosentan is contraindicated (Glynase® PresTab,® 2017). Bosentan is a vasodilator that is used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. Concurrent use of these two drugs may decrease the serum concentration of bosentan, increase the serum concentration of glyburide, and even cause liver enzyme elevations.

Concern for cross-reactivity between sulfonamide-containing drugs of different classes, e.g., a sulfonylurea and a sulfonamide antibiotic, and a concern for hypersensitivity reactions has been raised (Wulf & Matuszewski, 2013). The prescribing information for Amaryl® and Glucotrol® states that a known hypersensitivity to a sulfonamide derivative is a contraindication to the use of these drugs. This issue is not mentioned in the Glynase® PresTab® prescribing information.

Warnings & Precautions

Hemolytic anemia: Sulfonylureas can cause hemolytic anemia in patients who have glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab,® 2017). There is no current (past five years) published information on this topic, and the published articles on this adverse effect appear to primarily involve first-generation sulfonylureas that are no longer used. The prescribing information also states that there are post-marketing reports of hemolytic anemia in patients who were taking a sulfonylurea and who did not have G6PD deficiency.

Hypoglycemia: All the sulfonylureas can cause hypoglycemia and at times, severe hypoglycemia (Amaryl®, 2018; Douros et al., 2017; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). There are multiple reasons and risk factors for sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia, including (but not limited to) (Amaryl®, 2018; McCall et al., 2023; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017):

  • Poor caloric intake
  • History of severe hypoglycemia
  • Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia
  • Advanced age
  • Prolonged exercise
  • Concurrent use of other diabetic medications
  • Hepatic conditions
  • Renal conditions

Increased risk of cardiovascular mortality: The sulfonylurea prescribing information warns that the use of oral hypoglycemic drugs has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality when compared to treatment with diet and exercise (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). However, the prescribing information also states that this warning was based on a study that involved one drug, tolbutamide (a first-generation sulfonylurea that is no longer used), and a recent study (2023) concluded that the sulfonylureas are unlikely to increase the risk for cardiovascular mortality or all-cause mortality (Wang et al., 2023). The authors of this study indicated that there has been controversy over the cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas (Wang et al., 2023). The sulfonylurea prescribing information acknowledges the limitations of the basis for this warning, but its states that it is prudent to consider that this warning may also apply to other oral hypoglycemic drugs in this class, in view of their close similarities in mode of action and chemical structure to tolbutamide (Amaryl®, 2018; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). It is recommended that patients be counseled on the potential benefits and risks of sulfonylureas (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017).

Adverse Effects

Common adverse reactions of the sulfonylureas include (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017):

  • Dizziness
  • Headache
  • Flatulence
  • Flu-like symptoms
  • Nausea
  • Nervousness
  • Tremor

Thiazolidinediones

Available Forms & Dosing

The are two thiazolidinediones currently available (Actos®,2020):

  1. Pioglitazone
  2. Rosiglitazone

The brand name formulation rosiglitazone, Avandia, was recently discontinued.

Pioglitazone is also available as a combination product with alogliptin, glimepiride, or metformin.

Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are available as oral tablets, and they are taken once a day.

The prescribing information for pioglitazone and rosiglitazone does not mention dosing adjustments of the drugs for patients who have hepatic or renal impairment.

Mechanism of Action

The thiazolidinediones help maintain glycemic control by decreasing insulin resistance (Actos®, 2020; Cho, 2022; DeMarsilis et al., 2022).

Indications

The thiazolidinediones are used as an adjunct to diet and exercise to treat patients who have T2DM and who do not have good glycemic control (Actos®, 2020). They are considered second or third-line drugs (ElSayed et a., 2023b). They are not used to treat patients who have T1DM or diabetic ketoacidosis.

Contraindications

Thiazolidinediones are contraindicated in patients who have New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or Class IV heart failure. This issue will be discussed further in the US Boxed Warning section and the Warnings & Precautions section.

US Boxed Warning

In some patients, thiazolidinediones can cause or exacerbate heart failure. Patients taking thiazolidinedione should be carefully observed for signs and symptoms of heart failure particularly after the dose is increased. If a patient develops signs/symptoms of heart failure including dyspnea, edema, and/or excessive and rapid weight gain, the patient should be managed according to current guidelines.

As mentioned above, it is a boxed warning that thiazolidinediones should not be used for patients who have symptomatic heart failure, and they are contraindicated in patients who have established NYHA Class III or Class IV heart failure (Actos®, 2020).

Warnings & Precautions

Bladder cancer: Thiazolidinediones may increase the risk of bladder cancer. They should not be used in patients who have bladder cancer, and they should be used cautiously in patients who have had bladder cancer (Actos®, 2020).

The issue of thiazolidinediones and an increased risk of bladder cancer has been contentious (DeMarsilis et al., 2022). Some research has found that these drugs do increase the risk, but other studies have concluded that both pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are not a cause of an increased risk of bladder cancer (Han et al., 2016; Hsiao et al., 2013; Lewis et al., 2015; Malhotra et al., 2022). The prescribing information itself noted that during the three years of a clinical trial and ten years of follow up that the occurrence of bladder cancer did not differ between patients who received the placebo (Actos®, 2020). However, Lewis et al. (2015) wrote that their analysis of the data they reviewed was that pioglitazone was not associated with an increased risk for bladder cancer, but an increased risk could not be excluded (Lewis et al. 2015). The Actos® prescribing information indicates that there is insufficient data to decide whether pioglitazone promotes tumors for urinary bladder tumors (Actos®, 2020).

Congestive heart failure and edema: Fluid retention may occur and can exacerbate or lead to congestive heart failure. This adverse effect can occur when a thiazolidinedione is used alone or with other diabetic medications, or when the patient has NHYA Class I or Class II heart failure (Actos®, 2020).

Fluid retention has been reported to occur in 5% to 10% of patients who were taking pioglitazone (DeFronzo et al., 2019). This is caused by peripheral vasodilation and sodium retention (DeFronzo et al., 2019). Heart failure is very common in patients who have T2DM, and the thiazolidinediones, in part because they cause fluid retention, they can exacerbate heart failure in patients who have the disease, and they can ultimately lead to heart failure (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Katsiki et al., 2022). This risk is increased with concurrent use of thiazolidinediones and insulin or a sulfonylurea (Actos®, 2020; DeFronzo et al., 2019; Katsiki et al., 2022). Insulin can cause fluid and sodium retention (Katsiki et al., 2022). No current published information on the concurrent use of thiazolidinediones and sulfonylureas and heart failure were located.

Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are contraindicated in patients who have NYHA Class III or Class IV heart failure, and the 2023 ADA Standards of Care, Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment notes that both edema and heart failure are concerns when using these drugs (ElSayed et al., 2023b). See table 3 below.

Table 3: New York Heart Association Functional Classification (ElSayed et al., 2023b)
Class
I
Cardiac disease. No symptoms and no limitations in ordinary physical activity, e.g., no shortness of breath when walking or climbing stairs.
Class IIMild symptoms (mild shortness of breath or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity.
Class IIIMarked limitation/inactivity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g., walking short distances (20-100 m). Comfortable only at rest.
Class IVSevere limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.

Hepatic damage: There have been post-marketing reports of hepatic damage, hepatic failure, and fatal hepatic failure (Actos®, 2020). The prescribing information recommends measuring serum transaminases before beginning treatment with pioglitazone and if the transaminases are abnormal, pioglitazone should be used cautiously (Actos®, 2020). If the liver function test results are > 3 times the upper limit of normal, stop the use of the drug and look for a cause of this abnormality (Actos®, 2020).

Elevations in serum transaminases have been reported with the use of pioglitazone but not with rosiglitazone (LiverTox, 2018). Cases of hepatic failure and death from hepatic failure associated with the use of thiazolidine have occurred, but they are very rare (LiverTox, 2018).

Fractures: The Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events (2004) found that the incidence of fractures in women who took pioglitazone was 5.1% and for women who took a placebo the incidence was 2.5% (Actos, ® 2020). For men, there was no significant difference noted (Actos, ® 2020).

The 2023 ADA Standard of Care, Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment, notes fractures are associated with thiazolidinediones, and the 2023 ADA Standard of Care, Older Adults: Standards of Care In Diabetes, states that the thiazolidinediones should be used very cautiously in older adults on insulin therapy as well as those individuals who are at risk for osteoporosis, falls, or fractures (ElSayed et al, 2023b; ElSayed et al., 2023f).

Macular edema: Macular edema was reported in post-marketing experience with the thiazolidinediones (Actos®, 2020; Ambrosius et al., 2010). The prescribing information recommends that diabetic patients should have a regular ophthalmologic examination and if a diabetic patient has visual disturbances, they should immediately be referred to an ophthalmologist (Actos®, 2020).

Gower et al. (2018) did a longitudinal study of T2DM patients. The authors did not find an association between thiazolidinediones and diabetic macular edema progression or visual acuity outcomes, and they found no consistent evidence of an increased progression of diabetic retinopathy between patients who had been or had never been treated with a thiazolidinedione (Gowers et al., 2018).

The 2023 ADA Standard of Care, Older Adults: Standards of Care In Diabetes, indicated that the thiazolidinediones should be used very cautiously in older adults and for those at risk for macular edema (ElSayed et al., 2023f).

Adverse Effects

Common adverse effects of thiazolidinediones include:

  • Headache
  • Myalgia
  • Pharyngitis
  • Sinusitis
  • Upper respiratory tract infection

Basics of Pharmacologic Therapy for T1DM & T2DM

Insulin Therapy: T1DM

There are multiple ways that insulin can be used for patients who have T1DM, but regardless of the approach, there are three primary goals (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Powers et al, 2022c).

  1. Glycemic control, i.e., the desired A1C level for the patient without causing hypoglycemia.
  2. Prevent the development of DKA.
  3. Avoid hypoglycemic episodes. (Note: Hypoglycemia will be discussed later in this section)

Research has shown that in T1DM, close control of blood sugar, an approach that is often called intensive insulin therapy, is safe and it can significantly reduce the risk of DM macrovascular and microvascular complications (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

This mode of treatment is intended to mimic the normal physiological basal and prandial insulin secretion pattern. Patients can be treated with multiple injections of basal and prandial insulin or with a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), commonly referred to as an insulin pump (ElSayed et al., 2023b). The choice of which to use depends on several factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis decided that CSII via pump therapy has limited advantages for lowering HgA1C and for lessening severe hypoglycemia (ElSayed et al., 2023b). With multiple injections or with a CSII, the ADA recommends the use of analog insulins (Elsayed et al., 2023b).

The disadvantage of close glucose control is hypoglycemia (ElSayed et al., 2023b). The risk of hypoglycemia is inherent to insulin, but early studies of intensive glucose control showed that patients who were treated with this approach had significantly more episodes of hypoglycemia (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

Davis and Cryer (2022) note that hypoglycemic episodes are much more than a disturbance of one’s daily activities. Hypoglycemia is considered the limiting factor in glycemic control, and it can have many consequences (Davis & Cryer, 2022). It can (Davis & Cryer, 2022):

  • Cause morbidity (it has been estimated that 6% to 10% of people who have T1DM die because of hypoglycemia)
  • Interrupt glycemic control
  • Cause hypoglycemia unawareness (which increases the danger of a hypoglycemic episode)

Hypoglycemic events are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and cognitive dysfunction, especially if a patient has frequent events, and they can cause coma and seizures, and death (Elsayed et al., 2023c; O’Connell et al., 2021). The use of real-time continuous glucose monitors that have hypoglycemia alarms has helped to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia and maintain blood glucose within narrow levels (O’Connell et al., 2021). The ADA notes that for people who have T1DM, the use of a continuous glucose monitor is now considered to be the standard of care (ElSayed et al., 2023b). See table 4 below for a review of the criteria for different levels of hypoglycemia.

Table 4: Levels of Hypoglycemia (ElSayed et al. 2023c)
Level 1The blood glucose is < 70 mg/dL. A blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL is considered clinically significant because some patients who are hypoglycemic may have hypoglycemia unawareness or they may not have normal counter-regulatory response mechanisms.
Level 2The blood glucose is < 54 mg/dL and this is the level at which neurologic signs and symptoms occur and intervention, e.g., supplemental dextrose, glucagon, is needed to resolve the episode.
Level 3A hypoglycemic episode in which blood glucose levels are so low that impairment occurs. This is characterized by neurologic and physical impairment, the episode is severe, and the assistance of another person is necessary.

Patients who have continued and persistent episodes of hypoglycemia develop an abnormal response to low blood sugar that is characterized by decreased glucagon and epinephrine excretion and decreased suppression of insulin secretion, a phenomenon that is called hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure(Davis & Cryer, 2022). This change in the normal compensatory responses to hypoglycemia causes hypoglycemia and decreases awareness of hypoglycemia which, in turn, prevents self-treatment and predisposes the patient to more episodes of hypoglycemia, creating a vicious cycle of more frequent and more severe hypoglycemia. The latter phenomenon, called hypoglycemia unawareness, occurs in approximately 17%-50% of patients who have T1DM (Little et al., 2018).

Treating hypoglycemia is an important part of DM self-management. Patients should regularly be asked about their hypoglycemic occurrences, frequency, and severity, and the risks of hypoglycemia should regularly be reviewed (ElSayed et al., 2023c).

The preferred treatment for a conscious person who has a blood glucose < 70 mg/dL is (ElSayed et al., 2023c):

  • 15 to 20 grams of glucose.
  • After glucose is given, the blood glucose should be re-measured and if the person is still hypoglycemic, another glucose bolus should be given.
  • If the blood glucose normalizes or is rising, a snack or a meal should be eaten to prevent a recurrence.

Glucagon should be prescribed for any person who is at risk for level 2 or level 3 hypoglycemia, and anyone who has frequent close contact with the diabetic person, e.g., family members, school personnel, should be given instructions on how to administer glucagon (ElSayed et al., 2023c).

Insulin Administration

Insulin must be injected correctly for it to be effective. Frid et al. (2016) published a review of the best methods of insulin injection. The article is open-access, and it can be viewed by using the title (New Insulin Delivery Recommendations) and looking in a search engine or by using the following link.

The details of insulin injections will not be covered there. The basic principles of correct insulin injections are outlined below (Cleveland Clinic, 2018; ElSayed et al., 2023b; Klonoff & Kerr, 2018):

  • Body area: The recommended injection sites are the abdomen, buttocks, thighs, and upper arms.
  • Site rotation: Site rotation can prevent lipohypertrophy.
  • Needle length: A 4 mm needle is effective for delivering insulin. This needle can be used for people who are obese, as well. A long needle injected into the limb of a young, lean person may result in an IM injection.
  • Sub-Q injection: Never inject insulin into a muscle.
  • Insulin pen: The risk of hypoglycemia appears to be less with an insulin pen. When injecting insulin with a pen, hold the pen in place for 6-10 seconds.

Most patients prefer insulin pens compared to syringes and vials. Insulin pens are more convenient. Reasons why insulin pens are more convenient include (Cleveland Clinic, 2018; ElSayed et al., 2023b; Klonoff & Kerr, 2018):

  • The delivered dose is more accurate
  • Glycemic control is better (the dose is consistently more accurate)
  • The shorter needle length avoids intra-muscular injection
  • Patient adherence to the medication regimen is improved

In 2017, the FDA approved the first insulin pen combined with a smartphone application. This device, the InPen®, automatically tracks many aspects of insulin therapy and helps patients calculate doses and manage their insulin therapy.

Oral Diabetic Medications: T2DM

Treatment of a patient who has T2DM should always begin with medical nutrition therapy and exercise, but for many patients, these interventions do not work in terms of reaching the glycemic goal and pharmacologic therapy is necessary (Power et al., 2022c).

For most T2DM patients, pharmacologic therapy should be started with metformin (Choi et al, 2022). Metformin has many advantages (ElSayed et al., 2023b):

  • It is effective
  • It is safe
  • It is inexpensive
  • It causes a modest degree of weight loss
  • It does not cause hypoglycemia

If the patient has or is at risk for developing ASCVD, CKD, or heart failure, it is recommended to add a drug that has proven efficacy at lowering the risk of developing these complications and slowing their progression (Choi et al., 2022; ElSayed et al, 2023b). In these cases, the ADA 2023 Standard recommends a GLP-1 receptor agonist or an SGLT2 inhibitor (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

These drugs have been shown to reduce the risk for major cardiovascular events, they have a good-to-high efficacy, they cause weight loss, they do not cause hypoglycemia, and they can slow the progression of kidney disease (ElSayed et al., 2023b). Some experts have recommended that the GLP-1 receptor agonists or the SGLT2 inhibitors be the first-line choice for pharmacological therapy rather than metformin (Choi et al., 2022). Adding a second drug to the medication regimen is often needed and the choice of which medication depends on factors like cost and comorbidities.

Insulin Therapy: T2DM

For patients who have T2DM, the use of insulin should be considered if(ElSayed et al., 2023b; Powers et al., 2022a):

  • There are contraindications to the use of oral medications, e.g., hepatic and/or renal disease
  • The patient is lean or has severe weight loss
  • The patient is having signs/symptoms of hyperglycemia
  • The HgA1C levels are > 10%
  • The blood glucose is ≥ 300 mg/dL

It is recommended that T2DM patients who are using insulin continue to use metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023b).

In the initial stages, basal insulin is enough for glycemic control, but many patients will eventually need prandial insulin, as well (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Powers et al., 2022a).

T2DM & Hypoglycemia

Hypoglycemia is also a significant problem for patients who have T2DM (ElSayed et al., 2023c; Silbert et al., 2018). It is difficult to determine how common hypoglycemia is in this patient population, but literature reviews determined that it is not all unusual, especially in older adults or if insulin or a sulfonylurea is part of the therapy (Freeman, 2019; Silbert et al., 2018). Edridge et al. (2015) examined data from six studies, and the prevalence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was 45% and the prevalence of severe hypoglycemia was 6% (Edridge et al., 2015). A review by Silbert et al. (2018) found that over a 12-month period, 4% to 17% of patients reported needing assistance because of hypoglycemia and 37% to 64% had hypoglycemic symptoms (Silbert et al., 2018).

Patient Adherence To & Compliance With Insulin Therapy

Insulin therapy is more complex than oral medication therapy for T1DM and T2DM patients, and adherence to the prescribed insulin treatment plan is often poor (Fayaz et al., 2022; Mathew et al., 2022).

Studies done in the US and other parts of the world found that 14.3% to 63.4% of people who have T1DM had minimal to moderate adherence (Fayaz et al., 2022).

The adherence rate for people who have T2DM is, essentially, no better, with a 30% to 80% rate of non-adherence to the prescribed insulin regimen (Mathew et al., 2022).

There are multiple reasons for this phenomenon, including (but not limited to) (Fayaz et al., 2022; Mathew et al., 2022):

  • Cost
  • Difficulty of self-injection
  • Fear of needles
  • Forgetfulness
  • Injection site pain
  • Social stigma
  • Time demands

The barriers that prevent early and effective use of insulin and adherence to insulin therapy in patients who have DM, especially T2DM, are significant but certainly are not insurmountable. Key points for patient education should include:

  • Fear of failure: Many people with diabetes see insulin as representing failure. A patient's inability to adhere to lifestyle changes indeed contributes to the progression of diabetes, but patients should be reminded that diabetes, in many cases for reasons that cannot be controlled, is a progressive disease.
  • People with DM need insulin: All diabetics, to some degree, have a lack of insulin. Injecting is simply a way of providing the body with what it needs.
  • Insulin has many benefits: Patients with T2DM who need insulin should be told that insulin provides benefits not available from oral antihyperglycemics. The primary benefit is a more effective way of controlling blood sugar and this, in turn, reduces the risk of diabetic complications and can slow the progression of diabetic complications. Insulin is also more effective than oral anti-hyperglycemics at lowering HgA1C.
  • Insulin therapy is not always permanent: Some T2DM patients may need insulin for only brief periods.
  • Fear of pain: The needles used to inject insulin are very fine, and an injection into subcutaneous tissue is less painful than intramuscular injections or other procedures that involve needles. Pain is subjective, but it is reasonable to say that the pain of an insulin injection is brief and minor.
  • Insulin therapy is not complicated: Insulin therapy can be complex, but most patients quickly learn that with good teaching, using insulin and monitoring blood sugar is simple. In addition, insulin therapy, in one sense, frees patients from concerns about future complications and provides more control of the disease.

Conclusion & Key Points

There is evidence that nurses’ knowledge of the injectable and oral drugs used to treat DM can be incomplete and insufficient, and given the complexities associated with diabetic medications, this is not surprising (Daly et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2021b).

Understanding and remembering the indications for use, contraindications, US Boxed Warnings, warnings and precautions, and common adverse effects is a challenge, and each drug has its own mechanism/mechanisms of action. But there are similarities in these topics as they apply to diabetic medications.

Final Key Points to Remember

  • People who have T1DM need insulin. They cannot survive without insulin, in the simplest sense. People who have T1DM need an amount of insulin given at specific times that mimics the natural basal and prandial levels of insulin.
  • Someone who has T1DM may have a slight ability to produce insulin. The amount of insulin is negligible and as the mechanism of action of commonly used oral diabetic medications depends on the ability to produce more than a tiny amount of insulin, oral diabetic drugs are ineffective as a treatment for T1DM patients.
  • The indication for the use of oral diabetic medications is essentially the same for all of the drugs: The drugs are used as an adjunctive treatment for people who have T2DM and who could not/did not attain the desired level of glycemic control with lifestyle changes, diet, and exercise.
  • Each diabetic drug has its own mechanisms of action, but these mechanisms can be divided into two basic categories.
    • Insulin, sulfonylureas, and the meglitinide analogs, nateglinide and repaglinide, actively and directly lower blood glucose. These medications, by themselves, can cause hypoglycemia.
    • The other diabetic medications maintain blood glucose within a desired range by indirect mechanisms like increasing insulin sensitivity, decreasing glucagon release and decreasing hepatic glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, decreasing glucose absorption, or increasing glucose excretion. In excess doses, after an overdose, or used alone, these medications will not cause hypoglycemia.
  • Concurrent use of a diabetic medication that cannot cause hypoglycemia and one that does can put a patient at risk for hypoglycemia. This is a warning point that is mentioned in the prescribing information of many diabetic medications. It is important to know this!
  • Insulin preparations have different onsets, peaks, and durations of action. Because these vary significantly, it is important to know what they are for any insulin preparation that you give.
  • Parenteral insulin can be given intravenously, but only some of the preparations are suitable for intravenous administration and in specific circumstances. Most of the time, insulin is given Sub-Q.
  • The other intravenous diabetic medications are usually given at more extended time intervals, e.g., once a week. This is an important point to remember when giving these drugs.
  • Hepatic and renal impairment can negatively change the effectiveness of diabetic medications, and this can be significant. Some diabetic medications are contradicted if a patient has a GFR below a certain level. In addition, the dose of many diabetic medications must be decreased if a patient has hepatic and/or renal impairment.
  • Oral diabetic medications are chosen for their effects aside from controlling blood glucose. Some of the considerations that prescribers will use in picking one oral diabetic medication over another include cardioprotective and renal protective properties, their risk for causing/exacerbating cardiovascular morbidities, and the risk of weight gain associated with a drug.

Select one of the following methods to complete this course.

Take TestPass an exam testing your knowledge of the course material.
OR
No TestDescribe how this course will impact your practice.

Implicit Bias Statement

CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.

References

  • Actos.® (2020). Package insert. Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Lexington MA. June 2020. Accessed April 3, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Afrezza.® (2018). Package insert. MannKind Corp; Danbury CT.  October 2018. Accessed February 7, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Akram, A. (2021). Reactive hypoglycemia from metformin immediate-release monotherapy resolved by a switch to metformin extended-release: Conceptualizing their concentration-time curves. Cureus, 13(7), e16112. Visit Source.
  • Al-Abri, A.S., Hayashi, S., Thoren, K.L. & Olson, K.R. (2013). Metformin overdose-induced hypoglycemia in the absence of other antidiabetic drugs. Clinical Toxicology (Phila), 51(5), 444-447. Visit Source.
  • Albert, S.G., Wood, E.M. & Ahir, V. (2023). Glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists and A1c: Good for the heart but less so for the eyes? Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome, 17(1):102696. Visit Source.
  • Aldobeaban, S., Mzahim, B. & Alshehri, A.A. (2018). Recurrent hypoglycemia secondary to metformin toxicity in the absence of co-ingestions: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 12(1), 223. Visit Source.
  • Amaryl.® (2018). Package insert. Sanofi-Aventis; Bridgewater NJ. December 2018. Accessed April 2, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Ambrosius, W.T., Danis, R.P., Goff, D.C. Jr., Greven, C.M., Gerstein, H.C., Cohen, R.M., Riddle, M.C., Miller, M.E., Buse, J.B., Bonds, D.E., Peterson, K.A., Rosenberg, Y.D., Perdue, L.H., Esser, B.A., Seaquist, L.A., Felicetta, J.V., Chew, E.Y.; ACCORD Study Group. (2010). Lack of association between thiazolidinediones and macular edema in type 2 diabetes: The ACCORD eye sub study. Archives of Ophthalmology, 128(3), 312-318. Visit Source.
  • American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. (2023). ACR manual on contrast media. Accessed March 30, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Ang, L., Mizokami-Stout, K., Eid, S.A., Elafros, M., Callaghan, B., Feldman, E.L. & Pop-Busui, R. (2022). The conundrum of diabetic neuropathies-Past, present, and future. Journal of Diabetes Complications, 36(11), 108334. Visit Source.
  • Arnott, C., Fletcher, R.A. & Neal, B. (2022). Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, amputation risk, and fracture risk. Heart Failure Clinics, 18(4), 645-654. Visit Source.
  • Aroda, V.R. & Eckel, R.H. (2022). Reconsidering the role of glycaemic control in cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: A 21st century assessment. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 24(12), 2297-2308. Visit Source.
  • Bell, D.S.H. (2022). Metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency can cause or worsen distal symmetrical, autonomic and cardiac neuropathy in the patient with diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, 24(8), 1423-1428. Visit Source.
  • Bezin, J., Gouverneur, A., Pénichon, M., Mathieu, C., Garrel, R., Hillaire-Buys, D, Pariente, A, & Faillie, J.L. (2023). GLP-1 Receptor agonists and the risk of thyroid cancer. Diabetes Care, 46(2), 384-390. Visit Source.
  • Bochanen, N., Decochez, K., Heleu, E., Cuypers, J., Vercammen, C., Coremans, P., Vanhaverbeke, G., Shadid, S., Keymeulen, B., Bolsens, N. & De Block C. (2022). Lipohypertrophy monitoring study (LIMO): Effect of single use of 4 mm pen needles combined with education on injection site rotation on glycaemic control: Confirmation of an unpleasant truth. Diabetic Medicine, 39(1), e14672. Visit Source.
  • Boyle, C.N., Zheng, Y. & Lutz, T.A. (2022). Mediators of amylin action in metabolic control. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(8), 2207. Visit Source.
  • Bradley, C.L., McMillin, S.M., Hwang, A.Y. & Sherrill, C.H. (2022). Tirzepatide, the newest medication for type 2 diabetes: A review of the literature and implications for clinical practice. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 57(7). Visit Source.
  • Brutsaert, E.F. (2022). Diabetes mellitus (DM). Merck Manual. Professional Version. September 2022. Accessed April 6, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Byetta.®. (2022). Package insert. AstraZenca; Wilmington DE. December 2022. Accessed March 9, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC). (2022). National diabetes statistics report. Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the united states. Accessed January 12, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Chang, T-J. (2023). Mechanisms and the strategy for remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes Investigation. Visit Source.
  • Chen, J., Mei, A., Wei, Y., Li, C., Qian, H., Min, X., Yang, H., Dong, L., Rao, X. & Zhong, J. (2022). GLP-1 receptor agonist as a modulator of innate immunity. Frontiers in Immunology, 13, 997578. Visit Source.
  • Chiasson, J-l., Josse, R.G., Gomis, R., Hanefeld, M., Karasik, A., Laasko, M. & STOP-NIDDM Trial Research Group. (2002). Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: The STOP-NIDDM randomised trial. Lancet, 359(9323), 2072-2077. Visit Source.
  • Chidiac, J., Kassab, R., Iskandar, M., Koubar, S & Aoun, M. (2022). Metformin-associated lactic acidosis in a diabetic patient with normal kidney function and occult cirrhosis. Case Reports in Critical Care, 2022. Visit Source.
  • Cho, E.H. (2022). Oldies but goodies: Thiazolidinedione as an insulin sensitizer with cardioprotection. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal, 46(6), 827-828. Visit Source.
  • Choi, J.G., Winn, A.N., Skandari, M.R., Franco, M.I., Staab, E.M., Alexander J., Wan, W., Zhu, M., Huang, E.S., Philipson, L. & Laiteerapong, N. (2022). First-line therapy for type 2 diabetes with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A cost-effectiveness study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 175(10), 1392-1400. Visit Source.
  • Cleveland Clinic (2018). Insulin pen injections. Accessed April 11, 20123. Visit Source.
  • Costello, R.A., Nicolas, S. & Shivkumar, A. (2023). Sulfonylureas. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Visit Source.
  • Daly, B.M., Arroll, B., Scragg, R.K.R. (2019). Diabetes knowledge of primary health care and specialist nurses in a major urban area. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(1-2), 125-137. Visit Source.
  • Dave, C., Schneeweiss, S., Kim, D., Fralick, M., Tong, A. & Patorno, E. (2019). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk for severe urinary tract infections: A population-based cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(4), 248-256. Visit Source.
  • Davis, S.N. & Cryer, P.E. (2022). Chapter 406: Hypoglycemia In:  J. Loscalzo, A. Fauci, D. Kasper, S. Hauser, D. Longo, J.L. Jameson. (Eds.). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (21st ed.). New York, NY; McGraw-Hill Education: 2022. Online edition. Accessed April 11, 2023. Visit Source.
  • de Boer, I.H., Khunti, K., Sadusky, T., Tuttle, K.R., Neumiller, J.J., Rhee, C.M., Rosas, S.E, Rossing, P. & Bakris G. (2022). Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney International, 102(5), 974-989. Visit Source.
  • Deden, L.N., Aarts, E.O., Aelfers, S.C.W., van Borren, M.M.G.J., Janssen, I.M.C., Berends, F.J. & de Boer, H. (2018). Risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) in patients after gastric bypass surgery. Obesity Surgery, 28(4), 1080-1085. Visit Source.
  • DeFronzo, R.A., Inzucchi, S., Abdul-Ghani, M. & Nissen, S.E. (2019). Pioglitazone: The forgotten, cost-effective cardioprotective drug for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research, 16(2),133-143. Visit Source.
  • DeMarsilis, A., Reddy, N., Boutari, C., Filippaios, A., Sternthal, E., Katsiki, N. & Matzoros, C. (2022). Pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes: An update and future directions. Metabolism, 137:155332. Visit Source.
  • Dicembrini, I., Montereggi, C., Nreu, B., Mannucci, E. & Monami, M. (2020). Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: An extensive and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 159, 107981. Visit Source.
  • Di Mauro, S., Filippello, A., Scamporrino, A., Purrello, F., Piro, S. & Malaguarnera, R. (2022). Metformin: When Should We Fear Lactic Acidosis? Internal Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(15), 8320. Visit Source.
  • Dong, S. & Sun C. (2022). Can glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists cause acute kidney injury? An analytical study based on post-marketing approval pharmacovigilance data. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne), 13. Visit Source.
  • Douros, A., Yin, H., Yu, O.H.Y., Filion, K.B., Azoulay, L. & Suissa, S. (2017). Pharmacologic differences of sulfonylureas and the risk of adverse cardiovascular and hypoglycemic events. Diabetes Care, 40(11), 1506-1513. Visit Source.
  • Edridge, C.L., Dunkley, A.J., Bodicoat, D.H., Rose, T.C., Gray, L.J., Davies, M.J. & Khunti, K. (2015). Prevalence and incidence of hypoglycaemia in 532,542 people with type 2 diabetes on oral therapies and insulin: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of population-based studies. PLoS One, 10(6), e0126427. Visit Source.
  • ElSayed, N.A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V.R., Bannuru, R.R., Brown, F.M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B.S., Hilliard, M.S., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E.L., Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S.K., Perry, M.L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R.E., Seley, J.J., Stanton, R.C. & Gabbay, R.A. (2023a). 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Supp 1), S19-S40. Visit Source.
  • ElSayed, N.A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V.R., Bannuru, R.R., Brown, F.M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B.S., Hilliard, M.E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E.L., Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S.K., Perry, M.L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R.E., Seley, J.J., Stanton, R.C. & Gabbay, R.A. (2023b). 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Suppl. 1), S158–S190. Visit Source.
  • ElSayed, N.A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V.R., Bannuru, R.R., Brown, F.M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B.S., Hilliard, M.E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E.L., Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S.K., Perry, M.L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R.E., Seley, J.J., Stanton, R.C. & Gabbay, R.A. (2023c). 9. Glycemic targets: Standards of care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Suppl. 1), S97-S110. Visit Source.
  • ElSayed, N.A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V.R. Bannuru, R.R., Brown, F.M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B.S., Hilliard, M.E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E.L, Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S.K., Perry, M.L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R.E., Seley, J.J., Stanton, R.C. & Gabbay, R.A. (2023d).  3. Prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes and associated comorbidities: Standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Suppl 1), S41-S48. Visit Source.
  • ElSayed, N.A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V.R. Bannuru, R.R., Brown, F.M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B.S., Hilliard, M.E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E.L, Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S.K., Perry, M.L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R.E., Seley, J.J., Stanton, R.C. & Gabbay, R.A. (2023e). 16. Standards of care in the hospital: Standards of care in diabetes – 2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Suppl 1), S267-S278. Visit Source.
  • ElSayed, N.A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V.R., Raveendhara, R., Bannuru, R.R., Brown, F.M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B.S., Hilliard, M.E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E.L., Kahan, S., Khunti, K., Leon, J., Lyons, S.K., Perry, M.L., Prahalad, P., Pratley, R.E., Seley, J.J., Stanton, R.C. & Gabbay, R.A. (2023f). 13. Older adults: Standards of Care in diabetes—2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Suppl 1), S216-S229. Visit Source.
  • Esan, O., Vijoen, A. & Wierzbicki, A.S. (2022). Colesevelam – A bile acid sequestrant for treating hypercholesterolemia and improving hyperglycemia. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 23(12), 1363-1370. Visit Source.
  • Famulla S., Hövelmann, U., Fischer, A., Coester, H-V., Hermanski, L., Kaltheuner, M., Kaltheuner, L., Heinemann, L., Heise, T. & Hirsch, L. (2016). Insulin injection into lipohypertrophic tissue: Blunted and more variable insulin absorption and action and impaired postprandial glucose control. Diabetes Care, 39(9), 1486–1492. Visit Source.
  • Farxiga.® (2023). Package insert. Janssen Pharmaceutical; Wilmington DE. Accessed April 2, 2023.Visit Source.
  • Fayaz, F., Aghamadi, F., Noorian, S., Tabatabaei-Malazy, O. & Qorbani, M. (2022). Associated factors to insulin adherence in type 1 diabetes in Tehran and Karaj, Iran. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, 21(2), 1591-1597. Visit Source.
  • Florentin, M., Kostapanos, M.S. & Papazafiropoulou, A.K. (2022). Role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in the new era of antidiabetic treatment. World Journal of Diabetes, 13(2), 85–96. Visit Source.
  • Frias, J.P., Dex, T., Roberts, M. & Kaplan, A. (2019). A review of the safety and adverse event profile of the fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide. Diabetes Therapy, 10(1), 21-33. Visit Source.
  • Freeman, J. (2019). Management of hypoglycemia in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Postgraduate Medicine, 131(4), 241-250. Visit Source.
  • Frid, A.H., Kreugel, G., Grassi, G., Halimi, S., Hicks, D., Hirsch, L.J., Smith, M.J., Wellhoener, R., Bode, B.W., Hirsch, I.B., Kalra, S., Ji, L. & Strauss, K.W. (2016). New insulin delivery recommendations. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 91(9), 1231-1255. Visit Source.
  • Fullerton, B., Jeitler, K., Seitz, M., Horvath, K., Berghold, A. & Siebenhofer, A. (2014). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(2). Visit Source.
  • Gabbay, M.L., Crispim, F. & Dib, S.A. (2023). Residual β-cell function in brazilian type 1 diabetes after 3 years of diagnosis: Prevalence and association with low presence of nephropathy. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 15(1), 51. Visit Source.
  • Galindo, R.J., Beck, R.W., Scioscia, M.F., Umpierrez, G.E. & Tuttle, K.R. (2020). Glycemic monitoring and management in advanced chronic kidney disease. Endocrine Reviews, 41(5), 756-774. Visit Source.
  • Gallwitz, B. (2022). Clinical perspectives on the use of the GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide for the treatment of type-2 diabetes and obesity. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne), 13. Visit Source.
  • Garber, A.J., Abrahamson, M.J., Barzilay, J.I., Blonde, L., Bloomgarden, ZT., Bush, M.A., Dagogo-Jack, S., DeFronzo, R.A., Einhorn, D., Fonesca, V.A., Garber, J.R., Garvey, W.T., Grunberger, G., Handelsman, Y., Hirsch, I.B., Jellinger, P.S., McGill, J.B., Mechanick, J.I., Rosenblit, P.D. & Umpierrez, G.E. (2018). Consensus statement by the american association of clinical endocrinologists and american college of endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2018 executive summary. Endocrine Practice, 24(1), 91-120. Visit Source.
  • George, J., Lobkovich, A., Nardolillo, J., Farhat, N., Kolander, S. Thomas, E. (2022). Real-world evaluation of insulin requirements after GLP1 agonist or SGLT2 inhibitor initiation and titration. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 79(14), 1151-1157. Visit Source.
  • Gerstein, H.C., Coleman, R.L. Scott, C.A.B., Xu, S., Tuomilehto, J., Rydén, L., Holman, R.R. & ACE Study Group. (2020). Impact of acarbose on incident diabetes and regression to normoglycemia in people with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance: Insights from the ACE trial. Diabetes Care, 43(9), 2242-2247. Visit Source.
  • Glucotrol XL.® (2021). Prescribing information. Roerig; New York NY. November 2021. Accessed April 2, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Glynase® PresTab.® (2017). Package insert. Pharmacia & Upjohn; New York NY. August 2017. Accessed April 2, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Gower, E.W., Lovato, J.F., Ambrosius, W.T., Chew, E.Y., Danis, R.P., Davis, M.D., Goff, D.C. Jr., Greven, C.M.; ACCORD Study Group. (2018). Lack of longitudinal association between thiazolidinediones and incidence and progression of diabetic eye disease: The ACCORD eye study. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 187:138-147. Visit Source.
  • Grunberger, G. (2014). Insulin analogs-are they worth it? Yes! Diabetes Care, 37(6),1767-70. Visit Source.
  • Grundy S.M., Stone, N.J., Bailey, A.L., Beam C., Birtcher, K.K., Blumenthal, R.S., Braun, L.T., de Ferranti, S., Faiella-Tommasino, J., Forman, D.E., Goldberg, R., Heidenreich, P.A., Hlatky, M.A., Jones, D.W., Lloyd-Jones, D., Lopez-Pajares, N., Ndumele, C.E., Orringer, C.E., Peralta, C.A., . . . Yeboah, J. (2019). AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation, 139(25), e1082-e1143. Visit Source.
  • Guedes, M. & Pecoits-Fiho, R. (2022). Can we cure diabetic kidney disease? Present and future perspectives from a nephrologist's point of view. Journal of Internal Medicine, 29(2), 165-180. Visit Source.
  • Hahr, A.J. & Molitch, M.E. (2022). Management of diabetes mellitus in patients with CKD: Core Curriculum 2022. American Journal of Kidney Disease, 79(5), 728-736. Visit Source.
  • Hai, P.D., Thu, N.T., Phuong, L.L., Manh, N.V. & Hoa, L.T.V. (2022). Unusual case of metformin-associated lactic acidosis in patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. American Journal of Case Reports, 23, e937865. Visit Source.
  • Han, Y., Ye, X., Li, X., Yang, P., Wu, Y., Chen, L., Wu, H. & He, W. (2023). Comparison of an online versus conventional multidisciplinary collaborative weight loss programme in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 29(1), e13126. Visit Source.
  • Han, E., Jang, S.Y., Kim, G., Lee, Y.H., Choe, E.Y., Nam, C.M. & Kang, E.S. (2016). Rosiglitazone use and the risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. Medicine (Baltimore), 95(6), e2786. Visit Source.
  • He, L., Wang, J., Ping, F., Yang, N., Huang, J., Li, Y., Xu, L., Li, W. & Zhang, H. (2022). Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use with risk of gallbladder and biliary diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Internal Medicine, 182(5), 513-519. Visit Source.
  • Heinemann, L. & Parkin, C.G. (2018). Rethinking the viability and utility of inhaled insulin in clinical practice. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2018. Visit Source.
  • Holman, R.R., Coleman, R.L., Chan, J.C.N., Chiasson, J-L., Feng, H., Ge, J., Gerstein, H.C., Gray, R., Huo, Y., Lang, Z., McMurray, J.J., Rydén, L., Schröder, S., Sun, Y., Theodorakis, M.J., Tendera, M., Tucker, L., Tuomiletho, J., Wei, Y. & ACE Study Group. (2017). Effects of acarbose on cardiovascular and diabetes outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease and impaired glucose tolerance (ACE): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology, 5(11), 877-886. Visit Source.
  • Hsiao, F-Y., Hsieh, P-H., Huang, W-F., Tsai, Y-W. & Gau, C-S. (2013). Risk of bladder cancer in diabetic patients treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone: A nested case–control study. Drug Safety, 36(8), 643-649. Visit Source.
  • Invokana.® (2022). Package insert. Janssen Pharmaceuticals; Titusville, NJ. October 2022. Accessed April 2, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Jahir, T., Hossain, S., Baqum, M., Saidi, A, Risal, R. & Schmidt, M. (2022). A rare but life-threatening case of fournier's gangrene caused by sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, empagliflozin. Cureus, 14(9), e29264. Visit Source.
  • Jalleh, R.J., Jones, K.L., Rayner, C.K., Marathe, C.S., Wu, T. & Horowitz, M. (2022). Normal and disordered gastric emptying in diabetes: recent insights into pathophysiology, management, and impact on glycaemic control. Diabetologia, 65(12), 1981-1993. Visit Source.
  • James, C.F., Tripathi, S., Karampatou, K., Gladston, D.V. & Pappachan, J.M. (2022). Pharmacotherapy of painful diabetic neuropathy: A clinical update. Sisli Etfal Hastanesi Tip Bulteni: The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital, 56(1), 1-20. Visit Source.
  • Januvia.® (2022). Package insert. Merck Sharpe & Dohme; Rahway NJ. July 2022. Accessed April 1, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Jardiance.® (2022). Package insert. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals; Ridgefield CT: October 2022. Accessed April 2, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Juneja, D., Nasa, P. & Jain, R. (2022). Metformin toxicity: A meta-summary of case reports. World Journal of Diabetes, 13(8), 654-664. Visit Source.
  • Karagiannis, T., Avgerinos, I., Liakos, A., Del Prato, S., Matthews, D.R., Tsapas, A. & Bekiari, E. (2022). Management of type 2 diabetes with the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia, 65(8),1251-1261. Visit Source.
  • Karakousis, N.D., Pyrgioti, E.E., Georgakopoulos, P.N. & Papanas, N. (2022). Vitamin B12 and diabetic foot: Α mini-review. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. Visit Source.
  • Kasbawala, K., Stamatiades, G.A. & Majumdar, S.K. (2020). Fournier's gangrene and diabetic ketoacidosis associated with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: Life-threatening complications. American Journal of Case Reports, 21, e921536. Visit Source.
  • Katsiki, N., Kazakos, K. & Triposkiadis, F. (2022). Contemporary choice of glucose lowering agents in heart failure patients with type 2 diabetes. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 23(17), 1957-1974. Visit Source.
  • Katzung, B.B., Kruidering-Hall, M. & Trevor, A.J. (2019). Chapter 41: Pancreatic hormones, antidiabetic drugs, & glucagon. Katzung & Trevor's Pharmacology: Examination & Board Review, 12th ed. New York, NY; McGraw-Hill Education:2019. Online edition. Accessed March 5, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Khan A.B., Ahmad, A., Ahmad, S., Gul, M., Iqbal, F., Ullah, H, Liaba, S. & Orakzai, U.K. (2022). Comparative analysis of inhaled insulin with other types in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus, 14(4), e23731. Visit Source.
  • Khattab, R., Albannawi, M., Alhajjmohammed, D., Alkubaish, Z., Althani, R., Altheeb, L., Ayoub, H., Mutwalli, H., Altuwajiry, H., Al-Sheikh, R., Purayidathil, T. & Abuzaid, O. (2023). Metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency among type 2 diabetes mellitus' patients: A systematic review. Current Diabetes Reviews, 19(4), 1-10. Visit Source.
  • Kim, Y.K., Munir, K.M. & Davis, S.N. (2023). Type 1 diabetes: Key drug targets and how they could influence future therapeutics. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets. Visit Source.
  • Kim, J. & Kwon, H-Y. (2022). Not control but conquest: Strategies for the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes and Metabolism Journal, 46(2), 165-180. Visit Source.
  • Kleppinger, E.L. & Vivian, E.M. (2003). Pramlintide for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 37(7-8), 1082-1089. Visit Source.
  • Klonoff, D.C. & Kerr, D. (2018). Smart pens will improve insulin therapy. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology,12 (3), 551-553. Visit Source.
  • Kolasa, M., Olejnik, A., Rusak, E. & Chobot, A. (2023). Atherosclerosis: Risk assessment and the role of aiming for optimal glycaemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 29(1), 42-47. Visit Source.
  • Kuno, H., Fujimaru, T., Kadota, N., Konishi, K., Sekiguchi, M., Watanabe, K., Ito, Y., Nagahama, M., Taki, F., Hifumi, T., Otani, N. & Nakayama, M. (2023). Severe lactic acidosis with euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis due to metformin overdose. CEN Case Reports. Visit Source.
  • Kridin, K. & Bergman, R. (2018). Association of bullous pemphigoid with dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors in patients with diabetes: Estimating the risk of the new agents and characterizing the patients. JAMA Dermatology, 154(10), 1152-1158. Visit Source.
  • Lantus.® (2022). Package insert. Sanofi-Aventis, Bridgewater NJ. June 2022. Accessed February 27, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Li, S., Vandvik, P.O., Lytvyn, L., Guyatt, G.H., Palmer, S.C., Rodriguez-Gutierrez, R., Foroutan, F., Agoritsas, T., Siemienuk, R.A.C., Walsh, M., Frere, L., Tunnicliffe, D.J., Nagler, E.V., Manja, V., Åsvold, B.O., Jha, V., Vermandere, M., Gariani. K . . . & Mustafa, R.A. (2021). SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists for adults with type 2 diabetes: A clinical practice guideline. BMJ, 373, n1091. Visit Source.
  • LeRoith, D., Biessels, G.J., Braithwaite, S.S., Casanueva, F.F., Draznin, B., Halter, J.B., Hirsch, I.B., McDonnell, M.E. Molitch, M.E., Murad, M.H. & Sinclair, A.J. (2019). Treatment of diabetes in older adults: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 104(5), 1520-1574. Visit Source.
  • Levin P., Hoogwerf, B.J., Snell-Bergeon, J., Pyle, L. & Bromberger, L. (2021). Ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin improves glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinology Practice, 27(5), 449-454. Visit Source.
  • Lewis, J.D., Habel, L.A., Quesenberry, C.P., Strom, B.L., Peng, T., Hedderson, M.M., Ehrlich, S.F., Mamtani, R., Bilker, W., Vaughn, D.J., Nessel, L., Van Den Eeden, S.K. & Ferrara, A. (2015). Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer and other common cancers in persons with diabetes. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 314(3), 265-77. Visit Source.
  • Little, S.A., Speight, J., Leelarathna. L., Walkinshaw, E., Tan, H.K., Bowes, A., Lubina-Solomon, A., Chadwick, T.J., Stocken, D.D., Brennand, C., Marshall, S.M., Wood, R., Kerr, D., Flanagan, D., Heller, S.R., Evans, M.L. & Shaw, J.A.M. (2018).Sustained reduction in severe hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycemia: Two-year follow-up in the HypoCOMPaSS randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care, 41(8), 1600-1607. Visit Source.
  • LiverTox. (2021). Acarbose: Clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Accessed March 30, 2023. Visit Source.
  • LiverTox. (2020). Metformin: Clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Accessed March 30, 2023. Visit Source.
  • LiverTox. (2018a). Pioglitazone: Clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Accessed March 30, 2023. Visit Source.
  • LiverTox. (2018b). Rosiglitazone: Clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Accessed March 30, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Lombardo, F., Bombaci, B., Alibrandi, A., Visalli, G., Salzano, G. & Passanisi, S. (2022). The impact of insulin-induced lipodystrophy on glycemic variability in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Children (Basel, 9(7), 1087. Visit Source.
  • Malhotra, B., Hiteshi, P., Khalkho, P., Malik, R., Bhadada, S.K., Bhansali, A., Shafiq, N., Malhotra, S., Kumar, N., Rajput, R. & Rastogi, A. (2022). Bladder cancer with pioglitazone: A case-control study. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome, 16(11), 102637. Visit Source.
  • Mannucci, E., Nreu, B., Montereggi, C., Ragghianti, B., Gallo, M., Giaccari, A., Monami, M. & SID-AMD joint panel for Italian guidelines on treatment of type 2 diabetes. (2021). Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: An extensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases, 31(10), 2745-2755. Visit Source.
  • Masharani, U. (2023). 27-01: Diabetes Mellitus. In: M.A. Papadakis, S.J. McPhee, M.W. Rabow & K.R. McQuaid (Eds.). Current Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2023. New York, NY; McGraw-Hill. Accessed February 10, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Mathew, B.K., De Roza, J.G., Liu, C., Goh, L.J., Ooi, C.W., Chen, E., Poon, S. & Tang, Q.E. (2022). Which aspect of patient-provider relationship affects acceptance and adherence of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus? A qualitative study in primary care. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity, 15, 235-246. Visit Source.
  • McCall, A.L., Lieb, D.C., Gianchandani, R., MacMaster, H., Maynard, G.A., Murad, M.H., Seaquist, E., Wolfsdorf, J.I., Wright, R.F. & Wiercioch, W. (2023). Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 108(3), 529-562. Visit Source.
  • McGill, J.B., Peters A., Buse, J.B., Steiner, S., Tran, T., Pompilio, F.M. & Kendall, D.M. (2020). Comprehensive pulmonary safety review of inhaled technosphere® insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clinical Drug Investigation, 40(10), 973-983. Visit Source.
  • Mechanick, J.I., Apovian, C., Brethauer, S., Garvey, W.T., Joffe, A.M., Kim, J., Kushner, R.F., Lindquist, R., Pessah-Pollack, R., Seger, J., Urman, R.D., Adams, S., Cleek, J.B., Correa, R., Figaro, M.K., Flanders, K., Grams, J., Hurley, D.L., Kothari, S., Seger, M.V. & Still, C.D. (2019). Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 16(2), 175-247. Visit Source.
  • Meyer, J., Dreischmeier, E., Lehmann, M. & Phelan, J. (2023). The effects of adding semaglutide to high daily dose insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 57(3), 241-250. Visit Source.
  • Misra, S. & Mathieu, C. (2018). Are newer insulin analogues better for people with Type 1 diabetes? Diabetic Medicine, 37(4), 522-531. Visit Source.
  • Moelands, S.V., Lucassen, P.L., Akkermans, R.P., De Grauw, W.J. & Van de Laar, F.A. (2018). Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12(12). Visit Source.
  • Mori, Y., Matsui, T., Hirano, T. & Yamagishi, S-I. (2020). GIP as a potential therapeutic target for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease-a systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(4), 1509. Visit Source.
  • Mounjaro.™ (2022). Package insert. Eli Lily and Company; Indianapolis IN. September 2022. Accessed April 5, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Najjar, S. & Perdomo G. (2019). Hepatic insulin clearance: Mechanism and physiology. Physiology (Bethesda), 34(3), 198-215. Visit Source.
  • Naseralallah, L & Aboujabal B. (2023). Profile of tirzepatide in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Design, development, and place in therapy. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 24(4), 407-418. Visit Source.
  • Natarajan, R. (2021). Epigenetic mechanisms in diabetic vascular complications and metabolic memory: The 2020 edwin bierman award lecture. Diabetes, 70(2), 328-337. Visit Source.
  • Navaneethan, S.D., Zoungas, S., Caramori, M.L., Chan, J.C.N., Heerspink, H.J.L., Hurst, C., Liew, A., Michos, E.D., Olowu, W.A., Sadusky, T., Tandon, N., Tuttle, K.R., Wanner, C., Wilkens, K.G., Craig, J.C., Tunnicliffe, D.J., Tonelli, M., Cheung, M., Earley A., Rossing, P., de Boer, I.H. & Khunti, K. (2023). Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: Synopsis of the KDIGO 2022 clinical practice guideline update. Annals of Internal Medicine, 176(3), 381-387. Visit Source.
  • National Library of Medicine. (2022a). Repaglinide. Accessed April 1, 2023. Visit Source.
  • National Library of Medicine. (2022b). Nateglinide. Accessed April 1, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Ni, X., Zhang, L., Feng, X. & Tang, L. (2022). New hypoglycemic drugs: Combination drugs and targets discovery. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13, 877797. Visit Source.
  • O’Connell, J., Nathan, D.M., O’Brien, T. & O’Keefe, D.T. (2021). Treatment of diabetes - To pump or not to pump. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(22), 2092-2095. Visit Source.
  • Onglyza.® (2019). Package insert. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals; Wilmington DE. Accessed April 1, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Ozempic.® (2022). Package insert. Novo Nordisk, Inc.; Plainsboro NJ. Accessed March 13, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Papadakis, M.A. & McPhee, S.J. (2023). Gastroparesis & chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Quick Medical Diagnosis & Treatment 2023. Online edition. Accessed March 6, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Peng S., Xu, M., Zhao, H., Yang, H., Zhang, L., Hu, S., Lu, H., She Y., Lee, M. & Li, H. (2022). Gender differences in prevalence and clinical correlates of lipohypertrophy in insulin-exposed patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome, and Obesity, 15, 3871-3887. Visit Source.
  • Powers, A.C., Stafford, J.M. & Rickels, M.R. (2022a). Chapter 405: Diabetes Mellitus: Complications. In:  J. Loscalzo, A. Fauci, D. Kasper, S. Hauser, D. Longo, J.L. Jameson. (Eds.). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (21st ed.). New York, NY; McGraw-Hill Education: 2022. Online edition. Accessed January 12, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Powers, A.C., Niswender, K.D. & Evans-Molina, C. (2022b). Chapter 403: Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnosis, Classification, and Pathophysiology. In:  J. Loscalzo, A. Fauci, D. Kasper, S. Hauser, D. Longo, J.L. Jameson. (Eds.). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (21st ed.). New York, NY; McGraw-Hill Education: 2022. Online edition. Accessed February 5, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Powers, A.C., Fowler M.J. & Rickels, M.R. (2022c). Chapter 404: Diabetes Mellitus: Management and Therapies. In:  J. Loscalzo, A. Fauci, D. Kasper, S. Hauser, D. Longo, J.L. Jameson. (Eds.). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (21st ed.). New York, NY; McGraw-Hill Education: 2022. Online edition. Accessed March 5, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Powers, A.C. & D’ Alessio, D. (2022d). Chapter 51: Endocrine Pancreas and Pharmacotherapy of Diabetes Mellitus and Hypoglycemia. In: L.L. Brunton & B.C. Knollmann (Eds.). Goodman & Gilman’s: The Pharmacologic Basis Therapeutics (14th ed.). New York, NY; McGraw-Hill: 2023.  Online edition. Accessed April 1, 2023. Visit Source.
  •  Preda, V., Khoo, S.S., Preda, T. & Lord, R.V. (2023). Gastroparesis with bezoar formation in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: Potential relevance for bariatric and other gastric surgery. BJS Open, 7(1). Visit Source.
  • Puri, P. & Kotwal, N. (2023). An approach to the management of diabetes mellitus in cirrhosis: A primer for the hepatologist. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, 12(2), 560-574. Visit Source.
  • Rahman, F. & Tuba. S. (2022). Lactic acidosis associated with metformin in patients with diabetic kidney disease. Medical Archives, 76(4), 297-300. Visit Source.
  • Rietjens, S.J., van Riemsdijk, T.E., Sikma, M.A. & de Lange, D.W. (2023). High-dose insulin should NOT be used without vasopressors in calcium channel blocker toxicity. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 89(4), 1275-1278. Visit Source.
  • Robard, H.W. & Robard, D. (2020). Biosynthetic human insulin and insulin analogs. American Journal of Therapeutics, 27(1), e42-e51. Visit Source.
  • Roy, A., Sahoo, J., Narayanan, N., Merugu, C., Kamalanathan, S. & Naik, D. (2021). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-induced autoimmune diseases: Current evidence. World Journal of Diabetes, 12(9),1426-1441. Visit Source.
  • Ryan, G.J., Jobe, L.J. & Martin. R. (2005). Pramlintide in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical Therapeutics, 27(10), 1500-1512. Visit Source.
  • Seo, Y-G. (2021). Side effects associated with liraglutide treatment for obesity as well as diabetes. Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome, 30(1), 12-19. Visit Source.
  • Silbert R., Salcido-Montenegro, A., Rodriguez-Gutierrez, R., Katabi, A. & McCoy, R.G. (2018). Hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes: Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Current Diabetes Reports, 18(8), 53. Visit Source.
  • Steglatro.® (2022). Package insert. Merck Sharp & Dohme; Rahway, NJ: October 2022. Accessed April 2, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Sugumar V., Ang, K.P., Alshanon, A.F., Sethi, G., Yong, P.V.C., Looi, Y. & Wong, W.F. (2022). A comprehensive review of the evolution of insulin development and its delivery method. Pharmaceutics, 14(7), 1406. Visit Source.
  • Suryadevara, V., Roy, A., Sahoo, J., Kamalanathan, S., Naik, D., Mohan, P. & Kalayarasan R. (2022). Incretin based therapy and pancreatic cancer: Realizing the reality. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 28(25), 2881-2889. Visit Source.
  • Symlin.® (2020). Package insert. AstraZeneca, Wilmington DE. January 2020. Accessed March 5, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Tada, K. & Gosho, M. (2022). Increased risk of urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis under concomitant use of sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with antidiabetic, antidyslipidemic, and antihypertensive drugs: An observational study. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology, 36(6), 1106-1114. Visit Source.
  • Taylor, S.I., Yazdi, Z.S. & Beitlshees, A.L. (2021). Pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 131(2), e142243. Visit Source.
  • Thammavaranucupt, K., Phonyangnok, B., Parapiboon, W., Wongluechai, L., Pichitporn, W., Sumrittivanicha, J., Sungkanuparph, S., Nongnuch, A. & Jayanama K. (2022). Metformin-associated lactic acidosis and factors associated with 30-day mortality. PLoS One, 17(8), e0273678. Visit Source.
  • Thompson, C.A. & Stürmer, T. (2023). Putting GLP-1 RAs and thyroid cancer in context: Additional evidence and remaining doubts. Diabetes Care, 46(2), 249-251. Visit Source.
  • Timmons, J.G., Littlejohn, L., Boyle, J.G. & Petrie, J.R. (2022). Recent developments in adjunct therapies for type 1 diabetes. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, 31(12),1311-1320. Visit Source.
  • Ting, D.S., Cheung, G.C. & Wong, T.Y. (2016). Diabetic retinopathy: Global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: A review. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 44(4), 260-277. Visit Source.
  • Tradjenta.® (2022). Package insert. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Ridgefield CT. April 2022. Accessed April 2, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Tran, B.A., Updike, W.H., Bullers, K. & Seraq-Bolos, E. (2022). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use associated with fournier's gangrene: A review of case reports and spontaneous post-marketing cases. Clinical Diabetes, 40(1), 78-86. Visit Source.
  • Trulicity.® (2022). Package insert. Eli Lily, Indianapolis, IN. (ND). Accessed March 13, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Vallon, V & Verma, S. (2021). Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney and cardiovascular function. Annual Review of Physiology, 83,503-528. Visit Source.
  • Viljoen, A. & Bain, S.C. (2023). Glucagon-like peptide 1 therapy: From discovery to type 2 diabetes and beyond. Endocrinology & Metabolism (Seoul), 38(1), 25-33. Visit Source.
  • Wang, H., Cordiner, R.L.M., Huang, Y., Donnelly, L, Hapca, S., Collier, A., McKnight, J., Kennon, B., Gibb, F., McKeigue, P., Wild, S.H., Colhoun, H., Chalmers, J., Petrie, J., Sattar, N., MacDonald, T., McCrimmon, R.J., Morales, D.R., Pearson, E.R; Scottish Diabetes Research Network Epidemiology Group. (2023). Cardiovascular safety in type 2 diabetes with sulfonylureas as second-line drugs: A nation-wide population-based comparative safety study. Diabetes Care, 46(5), 967-977. Visit Source.
  • Wang, K., Zhang, S., Liu, C. & Chen Y. (2021). A meta-analysis and meta-regression on the prevalence of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients on insulin therapy. Therapies, 76(6), 617–628. Visit Source.
  • Wang, C,Y., Fu, S.H., Yang, R.S. & Hsiao. F.Y. (2019). Use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of arthralgia: Population-based cohort and nested case-control studies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 28(4), 500-506. Visit Source.
  • Welchol.® (2022). Package insert. Cosette Pharmaceuticals, South Plainfield NJ. February 2022. Accessed March 30, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Whitehead, M., Wickremasinghe, S., Osborne, A., Van Wijngaarden, P. & Martin, K.R. (2018). Diabetic retinopathy: A complex pathophysiology requiring novel therapeutic strategies. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 18(12), 1257-1270. Visit Source.
  • Wojtas, C., Rasarmos, A.P. & Naddaf, N. (2023) Case reports in endocrinology, 2023, 6835882. Visit Source.
  • Woronow, D., Chamberlain, C., Niak, A., Avigan, M., Houstoun, M. & Kortepeter, C. (2022). Acute cholecystitis associated with the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists reported to the US food and drug administration. JAMA Internal Medicine, 182(10),1104-1106. Visit Source.
  • Wu, X-Q., Zhang, D-D., Wang, Y-N., Tan, Y-Q., Yu, X-Y. & Zhao, Y-Y. (2021a). AGE/RAGE in diabetic kidney disease and aging kidney. Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 171, 260-271. Visit Source.
  • Wu, X., Zhao, F., Zhang, M., Yuan, L., Zheng, Y., Huang, J., Li, Y. & Li, C. (2021b). Insulin injection knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nurses in China: A cross-sectional nationwide study. Diabetes Therapy, 2(9), 2451-2469. Visit Source.
  • Wulf, N.R. & Matuszewski, K.A. (2013). Sulfonamide cross-reactivity: Is there evidence to support broad cross-allergenicity? American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 70(17), 1483-1494. Visit Source.
  • Yancey, K.B., Chong, B.F. & Lawley, T.J. (2022). Chapter 59: Immunologically Mediated Skin Diseases. In:  J. Loscalzo, A. Fauci, D. Kasper, S. Hauser, D. Longo, J.L. Jameson. (Eds.). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (21st ed.). New York, NY; McGraw-Hill Education: 2022. Online edition. Accessed April 1, 2023. Visit Source.
  • Yang, F., Dong, Y., Li, B., Ning, B. & Zhao, Q. (2022). Pancreatic safety of DPP-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 101(17), e29154. Visit Source.
  • Yang, W., Cai, X., Zhang, S., Han, X. & Ji, L. (2021). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor treatment and the risk of bullous pemphigoid and skin-related adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 37(3), e3391. Visit Source.
  • Yoshida, Y., Joshi, P., Barri, S., Wang J., Corder, A.L., O'Connell, S.S. & Fonseca, V.A. (2022). Progression of retinopathy with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetes - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Diabetes Complications, 36(8), 108255. Visit Source.
  • Zhao, X., Wang, M., Wen, Z., Lu, Z., Cui, L., Fu, C., Xue, H., Liu, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2021). GLP-1 receptor agonists: Beyond their pancreatic effects. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne), 12, 721135. Visit Source.