≥ 92% of participants will know how to administer diabetic medications safely and effectively.
CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.
≥ 92% of participants will know how to administer diabetic medications safely and effectively.
After completing this continuing education course, the participant will be able to:
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the United States (US). Approximately 37.3 million people (11.3% of the population) in the US have diabetes (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2022). Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cause significant microvascular and macrovascular complications (Powers et al., 2022a). These complications are the major cause of morbidity and mortality for diabetic patients (Limonte et al., 2022; Natarajan, 2021).
Chronic hyperglycemia is the defining characteristic of DM, and it is a primary cause of diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy, and diabetic retinopathy (Guedes & Pecoits-Fiho, 2022; Li et al, 2022; Natarajan, 2021; Powers et al., 2022a; Wu et al., 2021a; Ang et al., 2022; James et al., 2022; Powers et al., 2022a; Whitehead et al., 2018). In addition, T1DM and T2DM and hyperglycemia are strong risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease (Aroda & Eckel, 2022; Kolasa et al., 2023; Powers et al., 2022b). The pathogenic mechanisms that cause T1DM and T2DM are different, but the primary derangement of both types of the disease is hyperglycemia (Powers et al., 2022b):
In T1DM hyperglycemia is caused by the absence of insulin production.
In T2DM hyperglycemia is caused by decreased insulin production and increased insulin resistance.
Reducing hyperglycemia and controlling blood glucose can prevent microvascular complications of DM from occurring and progressing, and it may reduce the risk of developing cardiovascular disease, especially for patients who have T2DM and are treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, aka GLP-1-RAs (Aroda & Eckel, 2022; Limonte et al., 2022; Navaneethan et al., 2023; Powers et al., 2022d).
Hyperglycemia can be reduced by lifestyle modifications. However, T1DM is caused by the destruction of the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas.
Image 1:
Beta Cells
Patients who have T1DM need exogenous insulin to survive.
Image 2:
Type I Diabetes
For patients who have T2DM, remission of the disease is possible (Chang, 2023; Kim & Kwon, 2022). However, remission requires (for some patients) bariatric surgery, intensive glucose control, and intensive lifestyle modifications and this approach must be done early in the course of the disease before the irreversible decline of the beta cells has progressed too far (Chang, 2023; Kim & Kwon, 2022).
Image 3:
Type II Diabetes
Unfortunately, many T2DM patients cannot make the required lifestyle changes (Han et al., 2023). T2DM may be present for many years, possibly up to 10 years, before it is detected and at that time, patients will need antidiabetic drugs (ElSayed et al., 2023; Powers et al., 2022b). It is recommended that pharmacologic therapy begins at the time that T2DM is diagnosed, except in the event of contraindications (ElSayed et al., 2023a).
There are 12 classes of drugs used to treat T2DM and there are many types of insulin. This module will discuss (Taylor et al., 2021):
These topics will be covered for each drug: Available forms and dosing, including dosing adjustments for patients who have hepatic and/or renal impairment, mechanism of action, indications for use, contraindications, US Boxed Warning (if one is used), warnings and precautions, and adverse effects.
The onset of effect, the peak effect, and the duration of effect vary considerably between insulin preparations, and as insulin directly lowers blood glucose, knowing the pharmacokinetics of an insulin preparation is very important, and a short summary of that information will be provided here.
Diabetes is a complex disease, and the medications used to treat diabetes are complex, as well, especially the mechanisms of action. This is a simple way to understand these mechanisms of action and apply that understanding to patient care:
A 47-year-old male with no significant PMH visits his primary care physician because he has been experiencing fatigue, dizziness, and lack of energy. These symptoms started approximately four months ago. Initially, his symptoms were intermittent and mild, but they worsened in intensity and frequency the week before his visit. He cannot attribute their occurrence to any activity or time of day. He does report that his father had a history of diabetes.
Today’s Results:
On examination, there is no evidence of retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy on the exam or by laboratory testing.
The physician makes a diagnosis of T2DM. She advises the patient about lifestyle alterations (low-fat diet, exercise, smoking cessation, and weight loss), and prescribes metformin, 500mg PO, twice a day, and lisinopril, 20 mg, PO, once a day. The metformin dose is gradually increased to 850 mg PO twice a day to meet the A1C goal.
The patient has some nausea and what he describes as "stomach upset," but the gastrointestinal distress subsides after three weeks of taking metformin. However, after three months of treatment, his fasting serum blood sugar is 189 mg/dL, and his A1C is 8.3%. Glipizide, 5 mg PO, once a day is started.
The patient rededicates himself to losing weight and exercising, and three months later, he has lost 12 kg. His fasting serum glucose is 140 mg/dL, and his HbA1C is 7.4%. The physician advises the patient that he has made good progress but that he needs to continue with the treatment regimen as there is a risk that his diabetes will worsen and that he is at risk for diabetic complications.
A 58-year-old female with a PMH of T2DM and HTN is currently taking metformin. She is taking 1000 mg PO, twice a day, repaglinide 1 mg before each meal, and amlodipine. She visits her primary care physician to see the APRN for a checkup.
Results from Visit Six Months Ago:
Results from Today’s Visit:
There is no evidence on the physical exam or laboratory studies that the patient has retinopathy or neuropathy. The patient has not lost weight, and she admits that she is not 100% compliant with her medication regimen.
The APRN is concerned that the patient has not reached her glycemic goals after a year of therapy and that the patient has clinical evidence of diabetic nephropathy. He would like to prescribe insulin because he feels that the patient needs a more aggressive lowering of blood glucose and A1C, but he is worried that her compliance with self-injecting insulin will be very poor. The APRN advises the patient that she has evidence of kidney damage and is at risk for other complications.
The APRN arranges a consultation with a Certified Diabetes Educator and adjusts the anti-hypertensive regimen. The Educator sets up several intensive information/education sessions with the patient. The patient quickly learns self-injection techniques, but she is very reluctant to use insulin as she feels "it is just too complicated for her." The Educator arranges for frequent follow-up sessions that focus more on emotional support and encouragement than on technique. After three months of using basal and pre-prandial insulin, the patient's A1C is 7.4%, and her fasting glucose is 151 mg/dL.
Insulins are available as a parenteral preparation that is given as a subcutaneous (Sub-Q) injection. Some insulins can be given intravenously. Insulin is also available as an inhalation preparation.
The dosing of insulin is complex, and it varies depending on the patient and the type of insulin.
Insulin is an endogenous hormone that is secreted by the pancreas. The primary effect of endogenous insulin is lowering blood glucose.
Insulin is used for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes (ElSayed et al., 2023b).
Patients who have T1DM should start insulin therapy at the time of diagnosis, and insulin therapy will need to be continued for the remainder of the patient's life (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Chang et al., 2021, Gabbay et al., 2023).
Other uses of insulin include treatment for calcium channel blocker overdose and as a treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis (Rietjens et al., 2023).
Insulins are usefully categorized by their 1) Onset of action and duration of action, 2) Route of administration, and 3) Synthesis, i.e., how they are produced.
Onset and duration of action, parenteral insulins (Masharani, 2023):
Rapid-acting |
|
---|---|
Short-acting |
|
Intermediate-acting |
|
Long-acting |
|
Combination Insulins |
|
Inhaled Insulin |
|
Afrezza® is a rapid-acting insulin, and it is used for post-prandial glucose control. Onset of action is ~ 12 minutes and the duration of action is 90 to 270 minutes, depending on the dose (Afrezza®, 2018).
Inhaled insulin appears to be less commonly used than parenteral insulin. Clinical studies have shown that it is safe. In fact, its adverse effect profile, compared to parenteral insulin, is good, and it provides good glucose control, fewer hypoglycemic shifts, and a more rapid onset and quicker return to baseline that rapid-acing insulin analogs (Heinemann & Parkin, 2018; Khan et al., 2022; Levin et al., 2021; McGill et al., 2020).
Animal-derived insulins are no longer produced in the United States and synthetic insulins, either recombinant human insulin or insulin analogs, are used exclusively.
Recombinant human insulin is produced by recombinant DNA technology, and it is identical to exogenous insulin (Sugumar et al., 2022). The first recombinant insulin was manufactured in 1983, Humulin®, i.e., human insulin (Sugumar et al., 2022).
Analog insulins are also manufactured using recombinant DNA technology, but they are not identical to endogenous insulin. Analog insulins are modified by adding free fatty acid chains to the parent molecule or by changing the sequence of amino acids of the insulin (Misra & Mathieu, 2018). These alterations result in a different pharmacokinetic profile of the drug, mostly by changing the Sub-Q tissue absorption of insulin (Misra & Mathieu, 2018). Because the absorption is changed, the onset and duration of action are changed, the baseline and post-prandial insulin levels more closely resemble normal insulin secretion patterns, and this has several advantages (Misra & Mathieu, 2018; Grunberger, 2014; Robard & Robard, 2020). Example: The rapid-acting analog insulin, lispro, is faster than human insulin to reach the capillary bed (Misra & Mathieu, 2018). Because of this, the onset of action is quicker so the lispro can be taken closer to a meal (Misra & Mathieu, 2018).
Analog insulins are the recommended choice for treating DM (Kim et al., 2023; Robard & Robard, 2020). Human insulins have variable onsets of action and variable peak actions (Sugumar et al., 2022).
It is important to notice that the rapid-acting and the long-acting insulins are divided into categories. These categories refer to specific changes in the composition of the insulins, changes that differentiate them from human insulin and influence their pharmacokinetic profile. Example: Insulin is made of two polypeptide chains that are comprised of amino acid residues, and the aspart insulin Novolog is made by changing the normal sequence of aspartic acid (an amino acid that is involved in protein synthesis) at a specific position in one of those chains and replacing it with proline (Masharani, 2023; Sugumar et al., 2022).
Insulin is cleared by the liver (Najjar & Perdomo, 2019). Hepatic impairment can reduce insulin clearance and cause insulin resistance (Puri & Kotwal, 2023). This puts patients at risk for hypoglycemia, and patients who have hepatic impairment may need their insulin dose adjusted (Puri & Kotwal, 2023).
Many diabetic medications prevent blood glucose from becoming too high, but insulin, along with sulfonylureas and meglitinides, directly lowers blood glucose, and it can cause hypoglycemia.
Hypoglycemic episodes can be more than an inconvenience. The short-term and long-term consequences of hypoglycemia can be quite serious (Elsayed et al., 2023c).
Insulin affects the Na+/K+ ATPase enzyme that maintains the normal intracellular concentration of potassium. This increases the intracellular potassium level and can cause hypokalemia. Hypokalemia usually happens when insulin is given intravenously (Rietjens et al., 2023).
Renal impairment and chronic kidney disease (CKD) can significantly change glucose and insulin metabolism (de Boer et al, 2022; Galindo et al., 2020). These pathologies also interfere with the accuracy of HgA1C measurement, and they increase the risk of hypoglycemia (de Boer et al., 2022; Galindo et al., 2020). Unfortunately, the prescribing information for insulins and professional associations/authoritative associations do not have specific dosing adjustment guidelines for patients who have CKD or renal impairment. Examples:
Lipodystrophy is a fat tissue disorder and is a common adverse effect of insulin injections (Lombardo et al., 2022; Frid et al., 2016). There are two types of lipodystrophies caused by chronic insulin injections: lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy (Frid et al., 2016; Lombardo et al., 2022).
Lipohypertrophy is an accumulation of fat tissue at injection sites, and lipoatrophy is characterized by a depression/indentation and shrinking of the tissue at injection sites (Frid et al., 2016; Lombardo et al., 2022).
Lipohypertrophy is much more common than lipoatrophy (Wang et al., 2021). A meta-analysis by Wang et al. (2021) found that in patients who were chronic insulin users the prevalence of lipohypertrophy was 41.8% and the longer the duration of use, the greater the risk. A study done by Lombardo et al. (2022) followed 212 T1DM patients for three months, and the prevalence of lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy were 44.3% and 0.9%, respectively.
Pramlintide, trade name Symlin®, is the only amylinomimetic that is available in the United States.
Symlin is given by Sub-Q injection. It is given immediately before a major meal.
The manufacturer’s prescribing information states that there are no recommended dosing adjustments of Symlin® for patients who have hepatic impairment and that this clinical issue has not been studied (Symlin®, 2020).
The manufacturer’s prescribing information states that there are no recommended dosing adjustments of Symlin® for patients who have renal impairment, mild to severe, Clcr 15-29 mL/min (Symlin,® 2020). The use of Symlin® for patients who have end-stage renal disease has not been studied (Symlin,® 2020).
Pramlintide is an injectable antidiabetic medication that is categorized as an amylinomimetic, and it is a synthetic analog of amylin. Amylin, also known as isle amyloid polypeptide, is a peptide hormone that is produced in the beta-cells of the pancreas, and it is co-secreted with insulin in response to glucose (Boyle et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019; Timmons et al., 2022).
Amylin decreases post-prandial glucose by (Timmons et al., 2022):
Pramlintide reduces post-prandial blood sugar levels in three ways:
Amylin secretion is reduced in patients who have T1DM and T2DM (Boyle et al, 2022; Timmons et al., 2022). Pramlintide has a labeled use as an adjunctive treatment for patients who have T1DM or T2DM who use meal-time insulin but who do not have good glycemic control (Symlin®, 2020).
Pramlintide is contraindicated if a patient has hypoglycemia unawareness, and/or gastroparesis (Symlin®, 2020).
Pramlintide and insulin are typically given together, immediately before a major meal, and current use of Symlin and insulin can cause severe hypoglycemia (Kleppinger & Vivian, 2003; Ryan et al., 2005; Symlin®, 2020). This typically happens two to three hours after Symlin is injected (Symlin®, 2020). This adverse effect can occur in patients who have T1DM or T2DM, but it is more likely to occur in type 1 diabetics (Symlin®, 2020; Kleppinger & Vivian, 2003; Ryan et al., 2005).
The prescribing information for Symlin® recommends:
Note: Glucagon is a hormone that is produced in the pancreas. Glucagon increases blood sugar by stimulating/increasing hepatic glycogenolysis (breakdown of glycogen to glucose) and gluconeogenesis (formation of glucose from non-carbohydrates) (Katzung et al., 2019; Powers et al.,2022c). This process requires a sufficient store of hepatic glycogen in order to occur.
One concern is the issue of hypoglycemia, which has already been discussed.
Gastroparesis is a disease characterized by signs and symptoms of a gastric obstruction like abdominal distention, bloating, nausea, vomiting, and abnormal gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction (Jalleh et al., 2022; Papdakis & McPhee, 2023).
Diabetes itself can cause gastroparesis, and many diabetic patients have disordered gastric emptying (Jalleh et al., 2022; Papadakis & McPhee, 2023). Pramlintide slows gastric emptying, so it should not be prescribed for patients who have gastroparesis (Symlin®, 2020).
Pramlintide and insulin should not be mixed in the same syringe as this can change the pharmacokinetics of both drugs (Symlin®, 2020).
Pramlintide slows gastric emptying and if the effectiveness of an oral medication depends on the rapid onset of action, these drugs should be taken one hour before or two hours after a pramlintide injection (Symlin,®, 2020).
Adverse effects: ≥ 5% of patients experience anorexia, headache, nausea, and vomiting (Symlin®, 2020).
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are primarily injectables. There is one oral preparation. The GLP-1 receptor agonists that are currently available in the United States are listed below in Table 2.
|
The parenteral GLP-1 receptor agonists should be injected subcutaneously, not IM or IV. They should not be mixed in the same syringe with insulin or other medications. Some of the GLP-1-receptor agonists are taken once a week, and some are immediate-release formulations and are taken every day.
Some but not all the GLP-1 receptor agonists have a recommendation in their prescribing information to either use the drug cautiously or do not use it if a patient has renal impairment and an eGFR below a specific level. Check the prescribing information for each drug before giving it. Use these medications cautiously in patients who have renal impairment and in patients who have risk factors for renal damage.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone that is secreted by the α cells of the pancreas, the colon, and the distal ileum (Chen et al., 2022). The incretin hormones GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP, which will be discussed later) stimulate insulin release in response to blood glucose after a meal. They also reduce the release of glucagon. The GLP-1 receptor agonists are analogs of the GLP-1 hormone, and they regulate blood sugar by (Chen et al., 2022; Katzung et al, 2019):
People who have T2DM have a diminished level of incretin hormone activity, and the GLP-1 receptor agonists have a labeled use as a treatment for children ≥ 10 years old and adults who have T2DM as an adjunct to lifestyle changes to improve glycemic control (Karagiannis et al., 2022). The GLP-1 receptor agonists are typically used as a second-line drug, after metformin (Zhao et al., 2021).
In addition, the GLP-1 receptor agonists are recommended for diabetic patients who have cardiovascular disease (CVD) or who have risk factors for CVD (ElSayed, 2023b). The GLP-1 receptor agonists have been shown to reduce the risk for/incidence of serious CVD events like myocardial infarction, and they may help reduce the risk of renal diabetic complications (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Li et al, 2021; Viljoen & Bain, 2023).
The 2023 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Care noted that a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and/or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist with established cardiovascular disease benefit is recommended as part of the glucose-lowering regimen and comprehensive cardiovascular risk reduction for T2DM patients who have either of the following (ElSayed et al., 2023b):
Use of a GLP-1 receptor agonist is contraindicated if a patient has a family history or a personal history of medullary thyroid cancer or if a patient has multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. (See the US Boxed Warning and Warning/precautions sections for additional information).
The use of Byetta® (Exenatide) is contraindicated in patients who have a history of drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia caused by an exenatide product (Byetta, 2022). Serious, sometimes fatal, bleeding, from drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, has occurred with exenatide use (Byetta®, 2022). This is not a contraindication mentioned in the prescribing information of the other GLP-1 receptor agonists.
The prescribing information for the GLP-1 receptor agonists states that the use of GLP-receptor agonists caused thyroid C-cell tumors in animals. The relevance of these studies, vis a vis the use of these drugs in humans, has not been determined, and it is not known if these drugs cause thyroid cancer in humans, but GLP-receptor agonists are contraindicated if a patient has a family history or a personal history of medullary thyroid cancer or if a patient has a history of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2.
The GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may or may not increase the risk of developing thyroid malignancy (Bezin et al., 2023; Frias et al., 2019). Thompson and Stürmer (2023) discovered that diabetes itself increases the risk (20% to 30%) for thyroid cancer, and GLP-1 RAs may cause a small increase in thyroid cancer risk.
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 is a very rare inherited cancer. The GLP-1 receptor agonists’ prescribing information state that these drugs are contraindicated if a patient has this malignancy, but no more information is provided. No published information on the GLP-1 receptor agonists and this malignancy was located.
Acute gallbladder disease: The prescribing information for GLP-1 receptor agonists warns that these drugs have been associated with acute gallbladder disease, e.g., cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and an examination of cases from the US Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) adverse effect reporting system confirms this risk (He et al., 2022; Woronow et al., 2022). Specifically, He et al. (2022) found that using GLP-1 RAs increased risk of gallbladder or biliary diseases, especially when used:
Acute kidney injury: The GLP-1 receptor agonists have been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) and exacerbation of chronic renal failure (Dong & Sun, 2022; Seo, 2021). Most, but not all cases occurred in patients who had a risk factor for AKI like dehydration, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, the latter two being common adverse effects of these drugs (Dong & Sun, 2022; Yeo, 2021). Renal function should be monitored, especially if patients have a risk for factors for AKI or diabetic nephropathy (Dong & Sun, 2022; Yeo, 2021).
Diabetic retinopathy: The prescribing information for dulaglutide and semaglutide warns that these drugs have been associated with a risk of increasing diabetic retinopathy (DR) complications (Albert et al., 2023; Ozempic®, 2022; Trulicity.® (2022).
Hypoglycemia:
Pancreatitis: The prescribing information of the GLP-receptor agonists warns that during clinical trials, some patients developed pancreatitis. There is some evidence (albeit inconsistent) that incretin analogs cause a low-grade pancreatic inflammation (Suryadevara et al., 2022). Suryadevara et al. (2022) discussed that although there was some evidence, the RCTs did not distinguish pancreatic adverse events between the control patients and those receiving incretin. During therapy with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, it is prudent, and recommended, to monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis.
Severe Gastrointestinal Disease: The GLP-1 receptor agonists can cause delayed gastric emptying. In addition, these drugs should not be used in patients who have gastroparesis or severe gastrointestinal disease (Preda et al., 2023).
Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting are the most common adverse effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonists (Katzung et al., 2019; Viljoen & Bain, 2023). Nausea occurs in one in five patients, and diarrhea and vomiting in one in 10 patients (Viljoen & Bain, 2023).
There is one GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist available, tirzepatide, trade name Mounjaro™.
Tirzepatide is given as an Sub-Q injection, a single injection every four weeks.
There are no dosing adjustments of Mounjaro™ required for a patient who has hepatic or renal impairment (Mounjaro™, 2022).
Tirzepatide is a GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone, and it has metabolic and glucose-lowering effects that are like GLP-1. The mechanisms of action of tirzepatide are listed below (Bradley et al, 2022; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023):
Tirzepatide is used as a second-line antidiabetic drug for patients who have T2DM, as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control (Mounjaro™, 2022; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023).
Tirzepatide causes thyroid C-cell tumors in rats. It is unknown whether Mounjaro™ causes thyroid C-cell tumors, including medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), in humans as the human relevance of tirzepatide-induced rodent thyroid C-cell tumors has not been determined.
Mounjaro™ is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of MTC or patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2) (Mounjaro™, 2022). Counsel patients regarding the potential risk of MTC and symptoms of thyroid tumors.
Tirzepatide is contraindicated if a patient has a family history of a personal history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (Mounjaro™, 2022).
The Mounjaro™ package insert states that tirzepatide has caused thyroid C-cell tumors in animals. The relevance of these studies, vis a vis the use of these drugs in humans, has not been determined, and it is not known if these drugs cause thyroid cancer in humans (Mounjaro™, 2022).
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 is a very rare inherited cancer. The Mounjaro™ package insert states that tirzepatide is contraindicated if a patient has this malignancy, but no more information is provided. No published information on tirzepatide and this malignancy was located.
Acute kidney injury: Diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting are very common adverse effects of tirzepatide (Mishra et al., 2023; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023). Cases of acute kidney injury and worsening of chronic renal failure have been reported. Most of these occurred in patients who had developed diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and dehydration (Mounjaro™, 2022).
Diabetic retinopathy: Cases of diabetic retinopathy did occur during clinical trials of tirzepatide, but there were very few (< 0.2 of the patients) (Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023). The Mounjaro™ prescribing information notes that rapid improvement in glycemic control has been associated with a temporary worsening of diabetic retinopathy. This adverse effect was noted in the Diabetes and Complications Control Trial (DCCT) study (Ting et al., 2016). However, this study did not include tirzepatide.
Gallbladder disease: Gallbladder disease occurred during clinical trials of tirzepatide, but the number of cases of cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, and hepatic steatosis was < 1.0% and the number of cases was often no more than what occurred in patients treated with a placebo (Mishra et al., 2023; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023; Mounjaro™, 2022).
Heart rate: The GI receptors have a direct effect on the cardiovascular system, and during the SURPASS 1 to SURPASS 5 clinical trials of tirzepatide, 4.6% to 10% of the patients had sinus tachycardia (heart rate of ≥ 15 beats above baseline) compared to 4.3% of the patients who were given a placebo (Gallwitz, 2022; Mori et al., 2020). The clinical significance of this is not known (Mounjaro™, 2022).
Hypoglycemia: Tirzepatide by itself does not cause hypoglycemia. However, concurrent use of tirzepatide and insulin or an insulin secretagogue like a sulfonylurea may increase the risk of hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia, and the insulin/secretagogue dose may need to be reduced (Bradley et al., 2022; Mounjaro™, 2022). Hypoglycemia was noted as an adverse effect during the clinical trials of tirzepatide, but it was an uncommon adverse effect, it was seldom clinically significant, and there were only a few cases of severe hypoglycemia that required treatment (Karagiannis et al., 2022; Mishra et al., 2023).
Pancreatitis: Cases of pancreatitis and elevated lipase levels have been associated with the use of tirzepatide (Mishara et al., 2023; Mounjaro™, 2022; Naseralallah & Aboujabal, 2023). Patients should be monitored for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis.
Severe Gastrointestinal Disease: Tirzepatide can cause GI adverse effects, and it delays gastric emptying. The prescribing information for Mounjaro™ recommends that it should not be used in patients who have severe GI disease, including gastroparesis.
The ADA recommends that pharmacotherapy should be started when the patient is first diagnosed with T2DM unless there are contraindications (ElSayed et al., 2023b).
Combination treatment, i.e., metformin and another diabetic medication, is often used when a patient’s HgA1C is ≥ 1.5% of the desired level (ElSayed et al., 2023b). There have been few direct, head-to-head comparisons of oral diabetic medications in terms of efficacy and their advantages and disadvantages (Garber et al., 2018). The use of the other diabetic medications after metformin therapy has begun should be determined by these factors (ElSayed et al., 2023b):
Examples: The sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors and the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have a protective effect against the progression of CKD and they have a cardiovascular disease benefit, so these would be the drugs of choice for patients who have T2DM and who have or are at risk for these diseases (ElSayed et al, 2023b). If weight control is a concern, the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist semaglutide or the GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide would be recommended (ElSayed et al., 2023b).
Note: Insulin resistance (IR) is one of the primary metabolic derangements of T2DM, and some oral diabetic medications help maintain glycemic control by their effects on IR.
Note: There is very little recent (past five years) published information on the clinical aspects of using acarbose, e.g., dosing adjustment for patients who have renal impairment, warning, and precautions.
Acarbose is the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (α-glucosidase inhibitor) that is available. It is available in generic form, 25 mg and 50 mg tablets. Brand name formulations of acarbose were discontinued.
Acarbose is given three times a day, the maximum daily dose is 300 mg.
The α-glucosidase inhibitors help control blood glucose by delaying glucose absorption in the gut and decreasing post-prandial hyperglycemia (Chiasson et al., 2002).
Adult patients who have T2DM, as an adjunctive treatment, along with diet and exercise, to improve glycemic control.
The α-glucosidase inhibitors are not included in the ADA’s 2023 Standards of Care list of glucose-lowering medications used for patients who have T2DM (ElSayed et al., 2023b). In the 2023 Standards, section 3 “Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities”, it is mentioned that there is evidence that α-glucosidase inhibitors can lower the incidence of diabetes within specific populations (Chiasson et al., 2002; Gerstein et al., 2020; Holman et al., 2017; Moelands et al., 2018; Elsayed et al., 2023d).
Acarbose is contraindicated if a patient has any of the following conditions (Chiasson et al, 2002; Gerstein et al., 2020):
Elevated serum transaminases: If a patient has hepatic impairment, use acarbose cautiously and if the patient’s serum transaminases become elevated, reduce the dose, or stop the use of the drug. Acarbose can cause transaminase elevations > 3 times the upper limit of normal, but this adverse effect is dose-related, it typically resolves without treatment, no liver injury occurs, and patients are not symptomatic (Liver Tox, 2021). However, cases of fulminant, acute, hepatitis-like liver injury have been associated with acarbose, and fatalities have been reported. This is a rare occurrence (LiverTox, 2021).
Hypoglycemia: Concurrent use of acarbose and insulin, metformin, or sulfonylurea may cause hypoglycemia (Gerstein et al., 2020). Consider reducing the dose of the other drugs.
Renal impairment: Acarbose is not recommended for patients who have significant renal impairment (serum creatinine > 2 mg/dl or CrCl < 25 mL/minute/1.73m2).
The 2023 ADA Standards of Care/Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management does not mention the α-glucosidase inhibitors (ElSayed et al., 2023d).
Hahr et al. (2022) indicated that when glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is reduced, the serum level of acarbose and its metabolites are significantly elevated, and the authors recommend that acarbose not be given to patients who have a GFR < 26/mL/minute/1.73m2.
Dietary issues: A diet that is high in sucrose can cause GI side effects like bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, and loose stools. These GI problems are common side effects of acarbose, and sucrose may worsen them.
Abdominal pain, diarrhea, and flatulence are common adverse effects of acarbose, and GI complaints could exacerbate the conditions listed above.
Metformin is the only biguanide that is available in the United States.
Metformin is available as immediate-release (IR) oral tablets and extended-release (XR) tablets. It is also available as an oral solution and suspension.
Combination products are also available:
Metformin XR is slowly absorbed, it produces a therapeutic level of the drug over a 12 to 24-hour period, and this means that metformin XR needs only to be taken once per day (Akram, 2021).
Lactate is metabolized in the liver, hepatic impairment can cause an accumulation of lactate, and metformin itself, in some situations, can increase serum lactate (Chidiac et al., 2022). It is recommended to decrease the metformin dose for patients who have documented hepatic impairment, if hepatic impairment occurs, or if the patient develops metformin-induced liver damage. Metformin-induced liver damage has been reported, but, fortunately, it is a rare occurrence (LiverTox, 2020).
Metformin is excreted in the urine, renal impairment is a risk factor for serious complications (See the sections, US Boxed Warning and Warnings & Precautions), and metformin should not be used if a patient’s eGFR is < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2.
Metformin does not cause hypoglycemia (Katzung, 2019). Hypoglycemia associated with metformin has occurred, but these cases involved an overdose of the drug, drug-drug interactions, fasting, the presence of lactic acidosis, sustained physical exercise, and other specific, contributing causes (Akram, 2021; Al-Abri et al., 2013; Aldobeaban et al., 2018; DiMauro et al., 2022; Juneja et al., 2022).
Metformin is used to treat patients who have T2DM and who cannot control their blood sugar with diet and exercise alone. Metformin is typically the first medication used to treat T2DM (Di Mauro et al., 2022; ElSayed et al, 2023b). The 2023 ADA Standards, Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment states that metformin is safe and effective as well as inexpensive (ElSayed et al, 2023b). In addition, it may reduce risk of cardiovascular events and death (ElSayed et al, 2023b). Compared with sulfonylureas, metformin, when used as first-line therapy, has had beneficial effects on a patient’s HgA1C, weight, and cardiovascular mortality (ElSayed et al, 2023b).
Metformin is cleared by renal filtration and excreted in the urine, approximately 90% of the drug is eliminated by the kidneys, and the use of metformin in patients who have severe kidney disease can cause metformin-associated lactic acidosis, aka MALA (ElSayed et al, 2023b; Hai et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019; Rahman & Tuba, 2022; Thammavaranucupt et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022). The risk of developing MALA is the rationale for these contraindications.
Metformin-associated lactic acidosis is a rare complication of metformin but is a potentially deadly pathology with a mortality rate of up to 50% (Thammavaranucupt et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022; ElSayed et al., 2023b).
Metformin-associated lactic acidosis, or MALA, is defined as (Chidiac et al., 2022; Rahman & Tuba, 2022):
The signs and symptoms of MALA are non-specific and include (but are not limited to) (Chidiac et al., 2022; DiMauro et al., 2022):
Bariatric surgery: The absorption of XR metformin tablets may be decreased in patients who have had gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy, and in these situations, it has been advised to use IR tablets. Also, decreased absorption could be problematic if a patient has impaired renal function. The most current information on this topic is from 2018. Deden et al. (2018) measured plasma lactate levels in patients taking or not taking metformin who had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (Deden et al., 2018). The levels were done before and after the surgery, and the authors concluded that if a normal renal function was preserved, there was no need to decrease the metformin dose after an uncomplicated Roux-en-Y procedure (Deden et al., 2018).
The ADA Standards of Care 2023 advises that metformin should not be given on the day of a surgical procedure (ElSayed et al., 2023e).
Iodinated contrast: Iodinated contrast can cause acute kidney injury (AKI). The metformin package inserts states that it should be withheld for patients undergoing any radiological study in which intravenous iodinated contrast media is being utilized because of the risk of resulting acute kidney injury that would lead to a buildup of metformin, and ultimately a clinical result of lactic acid accumulation (ACR, 2023).
The American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media 2023 Manual of Contrast Media includes guidelines for the management of patients taking metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023e):
The use of metformin has been associated with vitamin B12 deficiency, especially long-term use of the drug and (possibly) with higher doses (ElSayed et al., 2023d; Khattab et al., 2022). This adverse effect has been associated with an increased risk of developing diabetic foot ulcers and causing or worsening distal symmetrical, autonomic, and cardiac neuropathy (Bell, 2022; Karakousis et al., 2022).
The ADA’s 2023 Standards of Care recommends considering the periodic measurement of B12, especially in patients who have anemia. We know that anemia may increase the loss of B12 from the liver (Bell, 2022; ElSayed et al., 2023e). It is reasonable to presume that patients who have peripheral neuropathy require B12 level monitoring because many diabetics have peripheral neuropathy, and it would be important know if a low B12 level is contributing to a patient’s signs and symptoms (Bell, 2022; ElSayed et al., 2023e).
Regarding the “when” and “how often” to monitor B12 levels, the ADA 2023 Standards of Care indicates that even though there are not formal recommendations for periodicity of monitoring, it is important to note that the lowering effect of metformin on vitamin B12 has been shown to increase with time (ElSayed, 2023d).
Colesevelam is available as a generic and as a brand name formulation, as Welchol® tablets, and as an oral suspension.
The mechanism by which colesevelam lowers blood glucose has not been identified (Welchol,® 2022).
Glycemic control for patients who have type 2 diabetes, as an adjunct to diet and exercise (Welchol®, 2022). The ADA 2023 Standards of Care do not mention colesevelam.
There are three contraindications for the use of colesevelam (Welchol®, 2022; Esan et al., 2022; Grundy et al., 2019):
Colesevelam can increase serum triglycerides, and a high serum triglyceride level can cause pancreatitis (Welchol®, 2022). Patients who have signs and symptoms of pancreatitis should discontinue the use of the drug.
Colesevelam can cause bowel obstruction, and its use is not recommended for patients who have gastroparesis, patients who may be at risk for a bowel obstruction, or patients who have had major gastrointestinal surgery (Welchol®, 2022).
Colesevelam lowers bile acid concentration, and bile acids are required for the absorption of the fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K require bile acids (Esan et al., 2022). During the licensing studies of colesevelam, the levels of vitamins A, D, and E were not affected, and the level of vitamin K (assessed indirectly by measuring PT and PTT) was not affected (Esan et al., 2022). However, the prescribing information recommends states that colesevelam may (italics added) decrease the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, and patients who are at risk for vitamin K deficiency (malabsorption syndrome, patients taking warfarin) or who have/are at risk of a vitamin A, D, or E deficiency may be at risk for this adverse effect (Welchol®, 2022). Oral vitamin supplements should be taken at least four hours before taking colesevelam and vitamin supplementation should be considered for patients who will be taking the drug for a long time (Esan et al., 2022; Welchol®, 2022).
Common effects of colesevelam include constipation, dyspepsia, and nausea (Welchol®, 2022).
There are four DPP-4 inhibitors available in the United States:
All four of these medications are available in tablet form. They are to be taken once a day.
The DPP-4 inhibitors are also combined with metformin, an SGLT-2 inhibitor, metformin and an SGLT-2 inhibitor, and with a thiazolidinedione.
Hepatic impairment: The prescribing information for Tradjenta® states that dosing adjustments of the drug do not need to be made for patients who have hepatic impairment (Tradjenta®, 2022).
The prescribing information for Januvia® and Onglyza® does not mention the issue.
The prescribing information for Nesina® states that dosing adjustments of the drug do not need to be made for patients who have mild to moderate liver impairment, the drug has not been studied in patients who have severe hepatic impairment, and Nesina® should be used cautiously in patients who have liver disease.
Renal impairment: The prescribing information for Onglyza®, Januvia®, and Nesina® recommends decreasing the dose in patients who have renal impairment.
Linagliptin is primarily eliminated by the enterohepatic system, and the prescribing information for Tradjenta® does not recommend decreasing the dose for patients who have renal impairment (Florentin et al., 2022).
The DPP-4 inhibitors inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), and DPP-4 is an enzyme that degrades GLP-1 and other incretins like GIP (Florentin et al., 2022; Katzung et al., 2019).
Glucagon-like peptide-1 is an incretin hormone that is secreted by the α cells of the pancreas, the colon, and the distal ileum (Chen et al., 2022).
The DPP-4 inhibitors are used for patients who have T2DM, along with diet and exercise, to maintain glycemic control (ElSayed et al., 2023b). The DPP-4 inhibitors are typically used as a second-line/third-line medication, in addition to metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Florentin et al., 2022).
There are no specific contraindications for the use of the DPP-4 inhibitors.
Arthralgia: In 2015 the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning about the DPP-IV inhibitors and the risk of severe arthralgia (Wang et al., 2019). Subsequent research has found that patients taking a DPP-4 inhibitor – any of the four – had a higher risk of developing arthralgia, but the risk decreased in long-time users (Wang et al., 2019). The prescribing information notes that when the use of the drug is stopped, the symptoms are resolved (Januvia®, 2022; Ni et al., 2022; Onglyza®, 2019).
Bullous pemphigoid: The prescribing information for all four DPP-4 inhibitors states in the post-marketing period, cases of bullous pemphigoid that required hospitalization developed in patients taking a DPP-4 inhibitor. Bullous pemphigoid is an auto-immune disease that usually occurs in the elderly (Roy, et al., 2021; Yancey et al., 2022). It is characterized by blistering skin lesions that usually develop on the lower abdomen, the groin, the flexor surfaces of the extremities and occasionally on the oral mucosa, and the patient may have severe pruritus (Roy, et al., 2021; Yancey et al., 2022). The use of DPP-4 inhibitors significantly increases the risk of developing bullous pemphigoid (Roy et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). The onset can be delayed by many months (Kridin & Bergman, 2018). Most patients do well when the use of the drug is stopped, but serious complications can happen (Kridin & Bergman, 2018). If a patient has signs and symptoms of bullous pemphigoid, the use of the DPP-4 inhibitor should be stopped immediately.
Heart failure:
Hypoglycemia: Concurrent use of a DPP-4 inhibitor and insulin or a sulfonylurea increases the incidence of hypoglycemia (Januvia®, 2022; Ni et al., 2022; Onglyza®, 2019). Consider decreasing the dose of the insulin or the sulfonylurea as needed to prevent this.
Pancreatitis: The prescribing information for all four DPP-4 inhibitors states that during clinical trials and in post-marketing experience, cases of acute and fatal pancreatitis were reported. The prescribing information also states that it is not known if patients who have a history of pancreatitis are at risk for developing this adverse effect. If a patient taking a DPP-4 inhibitor develops signs and symptoms of pancreatic damage, use of the drug should be discontinued (Januvia®, 2022).
A recent (2020) review of the literature stated that the available data do not currently support an association of DPP-4 treatment with pancreatitis nor pancreatic cancer (Dicembrini et al., 2020). Yang et al. wrote that there is no consensus on DPP-4s pancreatic safety (Yang et al., 2022).
Common adverse effects of the DPP-4 inhibitors are:
Nateglinide and repaglinide come in oral tablets. The brand name formulations of these drugs were discontinued.
Nateglinide and repaglinide are taken orally, three times a day, before meals (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).
The meglitinide analogs increase the release of endogenous insulin from the pancreas (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b). Nateglinide and repaglinide act by closing ATP-dependent potassium channels on pancreatic beta-cell membranes, the beta-cells are depolarized, and calcium moves into the cells, stimulating insulin release (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).
There are no specific contraindications to the use of nateglinide.
Concurrent use of repaglinide and a strong CYP2C8 inhibitor like gemfibrozil (Lopid®) can significantly increase the serum concentration of repaglinide and cause hypoglycemia. The combination of these drugs is contraindicated.
Bariatric surgery: A meglitinide should not be given during the immediate postoperative period to a patient who has had bariatric surgery (Mechanick et al., 2019).
Hypoglycemia:
Renal impairment: Both nateglinide and repaglinide can be used for patients who have renal impairment, but dosing adjustments need to be made, based on a patient's eGFR (LeRoith et al., 2019).
Weight gain: Both nateglinide and repaglinide can cause weight gain (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).
The most common adverse effects of nateglinide and repaglinide (aside from hypoglycemia) are headache (repaglinide) and upper respiratory tract infection (National Library of Medicine, 2022a; National Library of Medicine, 2022b).
The Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are available in tablet form. There are currently four SGLT2 available:
The SGLT2 inhibitors are also available as a combination product with metformin or a DPP-IV inhibitor.
The SGLT2 inhibitors are oral preparations, and they are taken once a day.
Dosing adjustment may be needed if the patient has hepatic impairment.
Dosing adjustment may be needed, or the use of the SGLT2 inhibitor may be contraindicated if the patient has end-stage renal disease (Farxiga,® 2023; Invokana®, 2022). Dosing adjustments for patients who have renal impairment are complex and specific to each drug. Check the prescribing information for details.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 is a glucose transporter found in the renal tubules, and SGLT2 reabsorbs a significant amount of filtered glucose from the proximal tubules. Inhibition of SGLT2 increases the renal excretion of glucose and lowers plasma glucose (Katzung et al., 2019).
There are four indications for the use of the SGLT2 inhibitors (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Farxiga,® 2023; Invokana,® 2022):
The SGLT2 inhibitors are antidiabetic drugs, but they also have beneficial cardiovascular and renal effects (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Vallon & Verma, 2021). These beneficial effects include their ability to lower the GFR, improve cardiac function, and reduce the risk of heart failure (Vallon & Verma, 2021).
The SGLT2 inhibitors are contraindicated for patients on hemodialysis (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022).
Genital mycotic infections: The use of an SGLT2 inhibitor increases the risk of developing a genital mycotic infection, in females and males, and the incidence has been reported to be > 3% and sometimes > 12% (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022). A previous history of a genital mycotic infection increases the risk of developing this adverse effect.
Hypoglycemia:
Ketoacidosis: Cases of ketoacidosis have been reported during clinical trials of the SGLT2 inhibitors, and there have been after-market reports of this adverse effect, as well (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022). Many of these cases were patients who had euglycemic DKA (blood glucose < 250 mg/dL, arterial pH < 7.3, serum bicarbonate < 18 mEq/L, and ketonemia), and recent research has confirmed that the use of the SGLT2 inhibitors significantly increases the risk of developing euglycemic DKA (Wojtas et al., 2023).
Lower limb amputation and fractures: The prescribing information for the SGLT2 inhibitors warns that their use has been associated with a risk of lower limb amputation and fractures. A recent (2022) literature review concluded that those with T2DM and CKD are at elevated risk of amputation and fracture (Arnott et al., 2022). Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors does not increase the risk of amputation or fracture overall (Arnott et al., 2022). The available data make it unlikely that canagliflozin, or SGLT2 inhibitors more broadly, increase the risk of amputation or fracture either overall or in any specific population subset (Arnott et al., 2022).
Necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum: Necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum, aka Fournier’s gangrene, is an infection of the fascial tissues in the perineum (Jahir et al., 2022; Kasbawala et al. 2020). It is highly progressive, and it can cause sepsis, shock, and multi-organ system failure (Jahir et al., 2022; Kasbawala et al. 2020). Fournier’s gangrene in these cases is likely caused by an increased urinary glucose concentration (Jahir et al., 2022).
Urosepsis:
Volume depletion: The SGLT2 inhibitors can cause volume depletion, and because of the patient population that takes SGLT2 inhibitors, this adverse effect can cause acute kidney injury (Farxiga®, 2023; Invokana®, 2022; Jardiance®, 2022; Steglatro®, 2022).
Common adverse effects of the SGLT2 inhibitors are an increased incidence of genital infections and urinary tract infections (Katzung et al., 2019).
The sulfonylureas that are currently available include:
All three medications are available as generics. The sulfonylureas are also available as a combination product with metformin.
The sulfonylureas are oral tablets, and they are taken once a day.
The prescribing information for the sulfonylureas does not have dosing recommendations for glimepiride, glipizide, and glyburide for patients who have hepatic impairment.
The prescribing information for the sulfonylureas does not have dosing recommendations for glimepiride, glipizide, and glyburide for patients who have renal impairment.
Hahr and Molitch (2022) stated that as GFR decreases, the clearance of sulfonylureas and their metabolites decrease, and this increases the risk of hypoglycemia. According to the authors, this is not an issue with glipizide, and no dosing adjustments of glipizide are needed for patients that have renal impairment. Dosing adjustments of glimepiride and glyburide should be made if the patient has a low eGFR (Hahr & Molitch, 2022).
The sulfonylureas stimulate the release of endogenous insulin (Amaryl®, 2018; Katzung et al., 2019; Powers & D’Alessio, 2023). The sulfonylureas bind to sulfonylurea receptor sites on the beta-cells of the pancreas, which closes ATP-sensitive potassium channels, the beta-cells depolarize and insulin is released (Amaryl®; Costello et al., 2023, Powers & D’Alessio, 2023). The sulfonylureas also increase insulin sensitivity and change glucose metabolism in the liver (Costello et al., 2023).
The sulfonylureas are used to treat patients who have T2DM and who have not attained optimal glycemic control with diet and exercise (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). Sulfonylureas are a commonly used second-line drug, used in combination with metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023b).
Glyburide is contraindicated for patients who have diabetic ketoacidosis or T1DM.
Concurrent use of glyburide and bosentan is contraindicated (Glynase® PresTab,® 2017). Bosentan is a vasodilator that is used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. Concurrent use of these two drugs may decrease the serum concentration of bosentan, increase the serum concentration of glyburide, and even cause liver enzyme elevations.
Concern for cross-reactivity between sulfonamide-containing drugs of different classes, e.g., a sulfonylurea and a sulfonamide antibiotic, and a concern for hypersensitivity reactions has been raised (Wulf & Matuszewski, 2013). The prescribing information for Amaryl® and Glucotrol® states that a known hypersensitivity to a sulfonamide derivative is a contraindication to the use of these drugs. This issue is not mentioned in the Glynase® PresTab® prescribing information.
Hemolytic anemia:
Hypoglycemia: All the sulfonylureas can cause hypoglycemia and at times, severe hypoglycemia (Amaryl®, 2018; Douros et al., 2017; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). There are multiple reasons and risk factors for sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia, including (but not limited to) (Amaryl®, 2018; McCall et al., 2023; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017):
Increased risk of cardiovascular mortality: The sulfonylurea prescribing information warns that the use of oral hypoglycemic drugs has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality when compared to treatment with diet and exercise (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). However, the prescribing information also states that this warning was based on a study that involved one drug, tolbutamide (a first-generation sulfonylurea that is no longer used), and a recent study (2023) concluded that the sulfonylureas are unlikely to increase the risk for cardiovascular mortality or all-cause mortality (Wang et al., 2023). The authors of this study indicated that there has been controversy over the cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas (Wang et al., 2023). The sulfonylurea prescribing information acknowledges the limitations of the basis for this warning, but its states that it is prudent to consider that this warning may also apply to other oral hypoglycemic drugs in this class, in view of their close similarities in mode of action and chemical structure to tolbutamide (Amaryl®, 2018; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017). It is recommended that patients be counseled on the potential benefits and risks of sulfonylureas (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017).
Common adverse reactions of the sulfonylureas include (Amaryl®, 2018; Glucotrol®, 2021; Glynase® PresTab®, 2017):
The are two thiazolidinediones currently available (Actos®,2020):
The brand name formulation rosiglitazone, Avandia, was recently discontinued.
Pioglitazone is also available as a combination product with alogliptin, glimepiride, or metformin.
Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are available as oral tablets, and they are taken once a day.
The prescribing information for pioglitazone and rosiglitazone does not mention dosing adjustments of the drugs for patients who have hepatic or renal impairment.
The thiazolidinediones help maintain glycemic control by decreasing insulin resistance (Actos®, 2020; Cho, 2022; DeMarsilis et al., 2022).
The thiazolidinediones are used as an adjunct to diet and exercise to treat patients who have T2DM and who do not have good glycemic control (Actos®, 2020). They are considered second or third-line drugs (ElSayed et a., 2023b). They are not used to treat patients who have T1DM or diabetic ketoacidosis.
Thiazolidinediones are contraindicated in patients who have New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or Class IV heart failure. This issue will be discussed further in the US Boxed Warning section and the Warnings & Precautions section.
As mentioned above, it is a boxed warning that thiazolidinediones should not be used for patients who have symptomatic heart failure, and they are contraindicated in patients who have established NYHA Class III or Class IV heart failure (Actos®, 2020).
Bladder cancer: Thiazolidinediones may increase the risk of bladder cancer. They should not be used in patients who have bladder cancer, and they should be used cautiously in patients who have had bladder cancer (Actos®, 2020).
The issue of thiazolidinediones and an increased risk of bladder cancer has been contentious (DeMarsilis et al., 2022). Some research has found that these drugs do increase the risk, but other studies have concluded that both pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are not a cause of an increased risk of bladder cancer (Han et al., 2016; Hsiao et al., 2013; Lewis et al., 2015; Malhotra et al., 2022). The prescribing information itself noted that during the three years of a clinical trial and ten years of follow up that the occurrence of bladder cancer did not differ between patients who received the placebo (Actos®, 2020). However, Lewis et al. (2015) wrote that their analysis of the data they reviewed was that pioglitazone was not associated with an increased risk for bladder cancer, but an increased risk could not be excluded (Lewis et al. 2015). The Actos® prescribing information indicates that there is insufficient data to decide whether pioglitazone promotes tumors for urinary bladder tumors (Actos®, 2020).
Congestive heart failure and edema:
Fluid retention has been reported to occur in 5% to 10% of patients who were taking pioglitazone (DeFronzo et al., 2019). This is caused by peripheral vasodilation and sodium retention (DeFronzo et al., 2019). Heart failure is very common in patients who have T2DM, and the thiazolidinediones, in part because they cause fluid retention, they can exacerbate heart failure in patients who have the disease, and they can ultimately lead to heart failure (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Katsiki et al., 2022). This risk is increased with concurrent use of thiazolidinediones and insulin or a sulfonylurea (Actos®, 2020; DeFronzo et al., 2019; Katsiki et al., 2022). Insulin can cause fluid and sodium retention (Katsiki et al., 2022). No current published information on the concurrent use of thiazolidinediones and sulfonylureas and heart failure were located.
Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are contraindicated in patients who have NYHA Class III or Class IV heart failure, and the 2023 ADA Standards of Care, Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment notes that both edema and heart failure are concerns when using these drugs (ElSayed et al., 2023b). See table 3 below.
Class I | Cardiac disease. No symptoms and no limitations in ordinary physical activity, e.g., no shortness of breath when walking or climbing stairs. |
Class II | Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. |
Class III | Marked limitation/inactivity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g., walking short distances (20-100 m). Comfortable only at rest. |
Class IV | Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients. |
Hepatic damage: There have been post-marketing reports of hepatic damage, hepatic failure, and fatal hepatic failure (Actos®, 2020). The prescribing information recommends measuring serum transaminases before beginning treatment with pioglitazone and if the transaminases are abnormal, pioglitazone should be used cautiously (Actos®, 2020). If the liver function test results are > 3 times the upper limit of normal, stop the use of the drug and look for a cause of this abnormality (Actos®, 2020).
Elevations in serum transaminases have been reported with the use of pioglitazone but not with rosiglitazone (LiverTox, 2018). Cases of hepatic failure and death from hepatic failure associated with the use of thiazolidine have occurred, but they are very rare (LiverTox, 2018).
Fractures: The Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events (2004) found that the incidence of fractures in women who took pioglitazone was 5.1% and for women who took a placebo the incidence was 2.5% (Actos, ® 2020). For men, there was no significant difference noted (Actos, ® 2020).
Macular edema: Macular edema was reported in post-marketing experience with the thiazolidinediones (Actos®, 2020; Ambrosius et al., 2010). The prescribing information recommends that diabetic patients should have a regular ophthalmologic examination and if a diabetic patient has visual disturbances, they should immediately be referred to an ophthalmologist (Actos®, 2020).
Gower et al. (2018) did a longitudinal study of T2DM patients. The authors did not find an association between thiazolidinediones and diabetic macular edema progression or visual acuity outcomes, and they found no consistent evidence of an increased progression of diabetic retinopathy between patients who had been or had never been treated with a thiazolidinedione (Gowers et al., 2018).
The 2023 ADA Standard of Care, Older Adults: Standards of Care In Diabetes, indicated that the thiazolidinediones should be used very cautiously in older adults and for those at risk for macular edema (ElSayed et al., 2023f).
Common adverse effects of thiazolidinediones include:
There are multiple ways that insulin can be used for patients who have T1DM, but regardless of the approach, there are three primary goals (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Powers et al, 2022c).
This mode of treatment is intended to mimic the normal physiological basal and prandial insulin secretion pattern. Patients can be treated with multiple injections of basal and prandial insulin or with a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), commonly referred to as an insulin pump (ElSayed et al., 2023b). The choice of which to use depends on several factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis decided that CSII via pump therapy has limited advantages for lowering HgA1C and for lessening severe hypoglycemia (ElSayed et al., 2023b). With multiple injections or with a CSII, the ADA recommends the use of analog insulins (Elsayed et al., 2023b).
The disadvantage of close glucose control is hypoglycemia (ElSayed et al., 2023b). The risk of hypoglycemia is inherent to insulin, but early studies of intensive glucose control showed that patients who were treated with this approach had significantly more episodes of hypoglycemia (ElSayed et al., 2023b).
Davis and Cryer (2022) note that hypoglycemic episodes are much more than a disturbance of one’s daily activities.
Hypoglycemic events are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and cognitive dysfunction, especially if a patient has frequent events, and they can cause coma and seizures, and death (Elsayed et al., 2023c; O’Connell et al., 2021). The use of real-time continuous glucose monitors that have hypoglycemia alarms has helped to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia and maintain blood glucose within narrow levels (O’Connell et al., 2021). The ADA notes that for people who have T1DM, the use of a continuous glucose monitor is now considered to be the standard of care (ElSayed et al., 2023b). See table 4 below for a review of the criteria for different levels of hypoglycemia.
Level 1 | The blood glucose is < 70 mg/dL. A blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL is considered clinically significant because some patients who are hypoglycemic may have hypoglycemia unawareness or they may not have normal counter-regulatory response mechanisms. |
---|---|
Level 2 | The blood glucose is < 54 mg/dL and this is the level at which neurologic signs and symptoms occur and intervention, e.g., supplemental dextrose, glucagon, is needed to resolve the episode. |
Level 3 | A hypoglycemic episode in which blood glucose levels are so low that impairment occurs. This is characterized by neurologic and physical impairment, the episode is severe, and the assistance of another person is necessary. |
Patients who have continued and persistent episodes of hypoglycemia develop an abnormal response to low blood sugar that is characterized by decreased glucagon and epinephrine excretion and decreased suppression of insulin secretion, a phenomenon that is called hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure(Davis & Cryer, 2022). This change in the normal compensatory responses to hypoglycemia causes hypoglycemia and decreases awareness of hypoglycemia which, in turn, prevents self-treatment and predisposes the patient to more episodes of hypoglycemia, creating a vicious cycle of more frequent and more severe hypoglycemia. The latter phenomenon, called hypoglycemia unawareness, occurs in approximately 17%-50% of patients who have T1DM (Little et al., 2018).
Treating hypoglycemia is an important part of DM self-management. Patients should regularly be asked about their hypoglycemic occurrences, frequency, and severity, and the risks of hypoglycemia should regularly be reviewed (ElSayed et al., 2023c).
The preferred treatment for a conscious person who has a blood glucose < 70 mg/dL is (ElSayed et al., 2023c):
Glucagon should be prescribed for any person who is at risk for level 2 or level 3 hypoglycemia, and anyone who has frequent close contact with the diabetic person, e.g., family members, school personnel, should be given instructions on how to administer glucagon (ElSayed et al., 2023c).
Insulin must be injected correctly for it to be effective. Frid et al. (2016) published a review of the best methods of insulin injection. The article is open-access, and it can be viewed by using the title (New Insulin Delivery Recommendations) and looking in a search engine or by using the following link.
The details of insulin injections will not be covered there. The basic principles of correct insulin injections are outlined below (Cleveland Clinic, 2018; ElSayed et al., 2023b; Klonoff & Kerr, 2018):
Most patients prefer insulin pens compared to syringes and vials. Insulin pens are more convenient. Reasons why insulin pens are more convenient include (Cleveland Clinic, 2018; ElSayed et al., 2023b; Klonoff & Kerr, 2018):
In 2017, the FDA approved the first insulin pen combined with a smartphone application. This device, the InPen®, automatically tracks many aspects of insulin therapy and helps patients calculate doses and manage their insulin therapy.
Treatment of a patient who has T2DM should always begin with medical nutrition therapy and exercise, but for many patients, these interventions do not work in terms of reaching the glycemic goal and pharmacologic therapy is necessary (Power et al., 2022c).
For most T2DM patients, pharmacologic therapy should be started with metformin (Choi et al, 2022).
If the patient has or is at risk for developing ASCVD, CKD, or heart failure, it is recommended to add a drug that has proven efficacy at lowering the risk of developing these complications and slowing their progression (Choi et al., 2022; ElSayed et al, 2023b).
For patients who have T2DM, the use of insulin should be considered if(ElSayed et al., 2023b; Powers et al., 2022a):
It is recommended that T2DM patients who are using insulin continue to use metformin (ElSayed et al., 2023b).
In the initial stages, basal insulin is enough for glycemic control, but many patients will eventually need prandial insulin, as well (ElSayed et al., 2023b; Powers et al., 2022a).
Insulin therapy is more complex than oral medication therapy for T1DM and T2DM patients, and adherence to the prescribed insulin treatment plan is often poor (Fayaz et al., 2022; Mathew et al., 2022).
The adherence rate for people who have T2DM is, essentially, no better, with a 30% to 80% rate of non-adherence to the prescribed insulin regimen (Mathew et al., 2022).
The barriers that prevent early and effective use of insulin and adherence to insulin therapy in patients who have DM, especially T2DM, are significant but certainly are not insurmountable. Key points for patient education should include:
There is evidence that nurses’ knowledge of the injectable and oral drugs used to treat DM can be incomplete and insufficient, and given the complexities associated with diabetic medications, this is not surprising (Daly et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2021b).
Understanding and remembering the indications for use, contraindications, US Boxed Warnings, warnings and precautions, and common adverse effects is a challenge, and each drug has its own mechanism/mechanisms of action. But there are similarities in these topics as they apply to diabetic medications.
CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.