≥ 92% of participants will know how to identify the major neurodevelopmental disorders, screening, and treatment recommendations in pediatric patients.
CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.
≥ 92% of participants will know how to identify the major neurodevelopmental disorders, screening, and treatment recommendations in pediatric patients.
After completing this continuing education course, the participant will be able to:
Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) is an umbrella term that includes a group of conditions negatively impacting the neurological system.
NDD’s occur from birth that further impact the development of the individual in their physical, intellectual, emotional, and adaptive progression (David et al, 2022). To identify these deficits, it is important to utilize reliable assessments and screening tools to identify the functional deficits of the individual. Healthcare professionals also need to understand how the patient may present in various settings.
In the early 1800s, an ophthalmologist named Kirk identified that children that had not experienced a brain injury and without cognitive retardation had trouble with reading word strings and defined this as “word blindness or a “learning disability” (Cainelli & Bisiacchi, 2022). This spurred additional research into neuroscience and learning disabilities. Since then, NDDs have been recognized in children, and the rates of disorders have increased steadily (Cainelli & Bisiacchi, 2022).
It is important for healthcare professionals to understand some of the known causes and risk factors for NDDs. Faruk et al. (2021) explains that there can be variations in how children reach and demonstrate developmental milestones, so it is important to know the basic expectations for developmental growth and perform screening to assess developmental delays.
Faruk et al. (2021) explains that developmental screening should be the first comprehensive diagnostic procedure to assess and screen pediatric patients for developmental delays. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) offers pediatric developmental screening milestone checklist forms from birth to age 5 (CDC, 2025a). The CDC also provides autism screening forms for pediatric patients ages 18 to 24 months (CDC, 2025a).
Hoglund et al. (2025) and Faruk et al. (2021) state that variations exist in pediatric screening globally outside the United States, which leads to a reduction in identification and early intervention. Varying cultural beliefs and perspectives on developmental delays also creates significant barriers to diagnosing the condition (Faruk et al., 2021). Wang et al. (2023) emphasize that early recognition and diagnosis of NDDs, with treatment collaboration with a multidisciplinary team approach, can reduce social impairment and improve future complications.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is classified as one type of neurodevelopmental disorder. More predominant in males, ASD occurs early in childhood, impacting language, communication, and social interactions.
Please see the following image for other signs and symptoms of ASD in children.
Image 1:
Signs of Autism
(*Please click on the image above to enlarge.)
It is important to be able to recognize the signs of ASD in children. Often, 40% of children experiencing ASD can show both aggression and self-injurious behavior (Edelson, 2022). Aggressive behavior that can be demonstrated can include (Edelson, 2022):
Self-injurious behaviors can also be seen with tissue damage that is non-lethal and self-inflicted (Sawant et al, 2023). It is theorized that this behavior occurs due to the impairment in language and communication and the reduced capacity to understand the environmental stimulation (Sawant et al, 2023).
Please review the following examples of screening tools that are available to help identify possible ASD in a child (American Academy of Pediatrics [AAP], 2025). This list is not exhaustive.
You can learn more about each of these and find others by visiting the American Academy of Pediatrics’ (AAP) screening tool finder at this link.
Early identification and screening for ASD is vital to start intervention services. The earlier that ASD is identified, the sooner interventions and services can begin to benefit the child and their development (CDC, 2025b). According to Hodis et al. (2025), there are 28 evidence-based interventions that can be provided for optimal treatment. These interventions address 13 different outcomes including behavioral, cognitive, sensory and music integration, and augmentative-based treatments incorporating social play and outcomes (Hume et al., 2021; Hodis et al, 2025).
A few examples of these 28 evidence-based interventions include (Hume et al., 2021; Hodis et al, 2025):
To review the list of 28 in their entirety, feel free to review the entire research article by Hume et al. (2021) at the original publication link.
No pharmacological interventions are recommended currently unless to treat the underlying behaviors that may occur like depression, anxiety, or ADHD symptoms. Jiang et al. (2022) explains that nonpharmacological interventions like music therapy, yoga, massage, acupuncture can be very helpful.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is linked to low levels of dopamine and noradrenaline interactions in the prefrontal cortex and the basal ganglia. ADHD is estimated to impact between 5.9 to 7.1% of children and adolescents in the world (Razzak et al, 2021). ADHD is considered to be a condition that starts in children but can progress later in life. It is 3 times more common in males (Williams et al, 2023).
Diagnosis is made utilizing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition text revision (DSM-V-TR) criteria (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2022). To meet criteria, symptoms must last more than 6 months in which executive dysfunction, hyperactivity, and/or inattentiveness occur in both the school and the home environment, or otherwise two separate locations (Magnus et al, 2023; Razzak et al, 2021).
Williams et al. (2023) notes that, in the prenatal and perinatal time period, risk factors that have been associated with ADHD include:
It is important to evaluate the child with a patient-centered, comprehensive assessment. The evaluation should include the child, the parent, the teachers, and even the school psychologist. Asking about core symptoms and behaviors is vital to understanding how the child interacts at home and at school.
Asking detailed questions on the core symptoms of attention deficit should occur with questions on the following:
As was just mentioned, the DSM-5-TR (2022) criteria for ADHD require the problem to be present for at least 6 months. The criteria also require that the child has at least six symptoms and that these symptoms start before the age of 12.
Image 2:
Three Core Symptom Categories of ADHD
The symptoms listed above, if reported, are what decide which type of ADHD the child has. Another important thing to remember is that the DSM-5-TR criteria also require that the symptoms interfere with or affect daily functioning of the child, in order for it to be at the level of a disorder (APA, 2022).
A comprehensive treatment approach with interdisciplinary collaboration is recommended to effectively manage ADHD. The provider should gather a detailed family and child personal history. Gather information from the educational setting on behaviors and school performance.
Providing education to the parent or caregiver on the disorder and potential causes is vital. Recommendations for behavioral therapy, parent training classes, and providing parent and child coping skills are important to share as well. Coordination with the school setting on educational plans like individualized education program (IEPs) plans or 504 plans is highly recommended to help contribute to student success. For all children with ADHD who attend school, the school must be involved in the treatment plan (CDC, 2024a). Performing screening and making decisions on pharmacological treatment is important as well.
Monitoring for side effects is required due to adverse effects on reducing appetite which may impact weight and on the cardiovascular system with electrocardiogram (EKG) abnormalities and potential QT-prolongation (Farzam et al., 2023).
Non-stimulants like atomoxetine are also indicated as options for treatment for ADHD. The abuse potential for nonstimulants is not a major consideration. Non-stimulants are used when children do not respond well to stimulants or parents want an alternative option. Some of the nonstimulants are atomoxetine, viloxazine, guanfacine, and clonidine. When children are placed on these medications, it is important to monitor their blood pressure and heart rate (Newcorn et al, 2022).
In general, the major treatment goals for ADHD are to reduce and improve core symptoms. Close monitoring and collaboration with other medical and education providers is recommended to ensure patient-centered care. Evaluation of educational needs for IEPs or 504 plans should occur on an annual basis. Recommendations for behavioral therapy and parent and child training classes to help improve core behaviors have been shown to be beneficial in long-term management. If medications are started, close monitoring of diet, weight, and vital signs are recommended (Magnus et al., 2023; Williams et al., 2023).
Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) fall under the NDD category as well. IDDs vary by age and gender. The occurrence is estimated at 10 to 15 children per 1,000 in the general population (Lee et al., 2023). Of those children, it is estimated that about 85% of them have only a mild intellectual disability (Lee et al., 2023).
The DSM-5-TR is used to diagnose intellectual disabilities. The IDD needs to occur before the age of 22 (some sources state the age of 18) and meet the criterion of A, B, and C for proper diagnosis of the intellectual disability (APA, 2022):
To summarize and further define, the IDD occurs in the developmental period in which the individual experiences both intellectual and adaptive functioning deficits. Intellectual functions require (APA, 2022):
Deficits in adaptive functioning, in which a failure exists for the individual to meet developmental and socio-cultural standards for independence, can impact (APA, 2022):
Lee et al. (2023) explained that intellectual functioning is essentially “intelligence” and can be measured with the intelligence quotient (IQ). A score of 70 or below indicates intellectual deficits (Lee et al., 2023). Categorization of IDD falls under the severity level scores of (Lee et al., 2023):
The evaluation is performed with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales.
The DSM-5-TR is used to diagnose IDDs, but it is also helpful in informing a proper assessment of intellectual disabilities. IDDs can be caused by multiple factors and require an in-depth assessment to identify the problem.
The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System measures adaptive function. This scale measures the adaptive functioning of the individual with interactions socially, communication, and general living function (Lee et al., 2023).
The United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (2021) explains that the means for securing an IDD diagnosis can be different for each child. For some conditions that are associated with IDDs, assessment might require blood tests for genetic conditions, an ultrasound during pregnancy, or even with amniocentesis during pregnancy (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2021). IDDs can also be diagnosed after birth and up to age 22. Therefore, later tests such as newborn screening after birth might capture other conditions that could eventually lead to IDDs (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2021).
Prenatal screening is recommended for identification of common IDD’s. Common screening tools to assess for IDDs are the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (Lee et al., 2023).
Other screening tools that can be used include the following (David et al., 2022):
Management of IDDs requires early recognition of the disability which includes evaluation to identify the overall disability and methods to improve overall daily functioning and reduction of worsening conditions that may impact the child’s future development (Lee et al., 2023). Behavioral interventions and educational support are necessary in the management.
A multidisciplinary collaborative approach needs to occur to coordinate academic modifications in the school environment and to treat any behavioral problems.
Pharmacological treatment is selected based on the symptoms. If the child is demonstrating aggressive behavior, then risperidone may be considered.
David is a 6-year-old in the first grade. He lives with his father and 2 older brothers, aged 9 and 11. His mother passed away 4 years ago. He has been having difficulty in school over the past 8 months. He is hyperactive, often running around the classroom, unable to sit still in his chair, disruptive and impulsive with grabbing things from other classmates and interrupting his teacher, Ms. Jones.
In light of this, Ms. Jones contacted the school nurse, and the school nurse gave the teacher a Vanderbilt screening form to complete. Ms. Jones reached out to the father to talk about his behavior, lack of attention, and poor first semester grades in the class. Ms. Jones also wanted to talk to the father about the high score on the Vanderbilt form that she completed. Ms. Jones also indicated that he had trouble with letters like “D” and “B”. David’s father, Mr. Smith, indicates that his son is very hyperactive at home, and they have the same concerns. Mr. Smith indicates that it is also causing conflict among David’s other two male siblings because David constantly grabs their things and creates tension when he is disruptive at home or interacting with them. Mr. Smith informed the teacher that his own older brother suffered from hyperactivity as a child when they were growing up and had a learning disability, Dyslexia. Mr. Smith asks Ms. Jones what the next steps are. Ms. Jones indicated that David can be referred to a few different specialists but that she would recommend a child psychologist for further evaluation of his behavior and activity and decide on further treatment.
During the clinical evaluation, the child psychologist talked to Mr. Smith and asked about David’s interaction, attention, and behavior at home. The psychologist reviewed the Vanderbilt teacher form and the Vanderbilt parent form. Both scores were elevated and pointed to ADHD.
During the initial visit with the psychologist, David is very active in the room. He is touching all the equipment on the desk and moving from one thing to another. Mr. Smith voices his concerns to the psychologist that his lack of attention and hyperactivity is causing trouble in school and in relation to his interactions with his two older siblings. The psychologist tells Mr. Smith that he wants to talk to David and evaluate him in a multistep process. He then asks Mr. Smith to leave the office so he can meet with David to evaluate him alone.
The child psychologist starts to ask David questions about how he is doing. David tells the psychologist, “I am fine” and “I am bored.” David continues to roam around the room. The psychologist asks David to sit down and asks him to write his first name, draw a picture of a square and a circle. David writes his name, “bavib” and draws the square but then immediately gets up from his chair and goes to the window to grabs a plastic truck sitting on the windowsill. The psychologist asks him, “What do you think it is?” David responds loudly and aggressively, “You know it is a truck!” The psychologist asks him to come back and sit down to finish with the project. David says, “This is boring and I’m not doing it!” The psychologist asks, “What would you like to do? David replies, “Do you have any video games?” He then runs to the toy box and starts pulling all the toys out of the box. The psychologist finishes the evaluation and calls the father back into the room.
The psychologist brings Mr. Smith back into the room, and he explains that David may have an NDD and that he will need additional testing. The psychologist diagnoses David with ADHD based on the teacher and the father’s reports of his activity and the Vanderbilt screening tool scores being elevated. The psychologist explains that the Vanderbilt teacher and parent screening scores were above the normal range. The psychologist recommends that Mr. Smith get David into some behavioral therapy with a therapist who specializes in pediatric ADHD and for Mr. Smith to also participate in some parental training in behavioral management.
They all discussed the next steps in the treatment plan, which include getting an individualized education program (IEP) set up so he could also be evaluated for his current learning disability and possible dyslexia. No medications are indicated currently until he sees the therapist. If medications are considered later, methylphenidate, more commonly known as Ritalin ®, will be trialed.
The CDC recommends that behavioral intervention be tried first in children between the ages of 4-7 (CDC, 2024b). A follow-up appointment was scheduled for one month later to recheck David’s behavior after one month of therapy. Information was also provided for Mr. Smith to contact the office if there are any additional questions or any worsening of the condition.
In one month, David sees the psychologist for the follow-up appointment. Mr. Smith tells the psychologist that therapy has not really helped. David has been going to therapy 2x per week for the past month. He is still having the same issues in school, and it has worsened, and he does not want to go to therapy and is getting more frustrated and disruptive at home. Mr. Smith is requesting a trial of Ritalin ® and would like to come back in one month for a follow-up. The psychologist explains that he will need to refer them to a psychiatrist or a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP) to prescribe the medication. Recommendations were given to the father to continue with therapy until they get an appointment with the other provider for medication initiation and to follow-up again in one month for re-evaluation after starting the medication. Mr. Smith agrees to the plan of care recommendations.
Because the topic of “Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Pediatrics” is so extensive and broad, reviewing all the components of the disorder is difficult to do in one course. Additional resources are provided for your review related to children, adolescents, families, and other important national resources and guidelines to help guide your understanding of the problem and about providing resources to the family to aid in treatment.
Once a neurodevelopmental disorder is identified, the child as well as the family, require support and guidance in management and treatment. It is vital to recognize the problem and provide early interventions to treat the condition. NDDs are treatable and can help avoid long-term complications related to behavior and comorbid learning disabilities. Interprofessional collaboration is needed with the school setting, clinical, and community resources to promote positive outcomes (Hodis et al., 2025).
CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.