≥ 92% of participants will know about the pharmacological class of GLP-1 RAs.

CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.
≥ 92% of participants will know about the pharmacological class of GLP-1 RAs.
After completing this continuing education course, the learner will be able to:
The gut has long been recognized as a key portal to enhancing human health. The discovery of the incretin effect led to studies on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). The GLP-1 RA pharmacologic class of medications has revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. These unique drugs have been successful in treating both conditions for many people, though they have also created significant controversy and media attention. Nurses and other healthcare professionals must possess a thorough understanding of these medications to accurately assess, advise, prescribe (if applicable), and evaluate GLP-1 RA use for each patient.
Obesity is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 30.0 kilogram per square meter (kg/m²) or higher, and severe obesity is described as having a BMI of 40.0 kg/m² or higher. In the United States, the prevalence of obesity is reported at a staggering 100 million adults with obesity and 22 million adults with severe obesity (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2024). It is well established that obesity and severe obesity are linked to several chronic health conditions, including T2DM and cardiovascular disease.
Of the one in nine adults worldwide living with diabetes, 90-95% are living with T2DM. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) forecasts that by 2050, the prevalence will increase by 46%, increasing the prevalence to over 850 million people (IDF, n.d.). An association has been found that non-Hispanic black individuals, Hispanic individuals, and those with a high school diploma or lower education level have higher rates of both obesity and T2DM (IDF, n.d.).
Historically, many pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been used to treat both diabetes and obesity to improve health outcomes. Until the release of GLP-1 RA medications, there were few pharmacologic therapy options to treat these chronic diseases.
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) was a novel incretin hormone studied in the 1970s. The GLP-1 hormone timeline began with animal studies in the 1980s. The GLP-1 and GIP incretin hormone research contributed to the recognition of GLP-1's stimulation of insulin secretion and its profound effect on satiety. As the incretin effect was further studied, research on Gila monster venom led to the discovery of exendin-4, the first stable peptide used in pharmacological therapy (Zheng et al., 2024).
The human body has several different forms of GLP-1, which are excreted from the L-cells of the small intestine. Although GLP-1 is found in fasting states, a two- to threefold increase in GLP-1 is observed within minutes of consuming carbohydrates and fats, with protein to a lesser extent. Circulating GLP-1 binds to GLP-1 RA on the pancreatic beta (β) cells to stimulate insulin secretion and the pancreatic alpha (α) cells to inhibit glucagon secretion. Unfortunately, only 10-15% of the GLP-1 hormone makes it to circulation as it is quickly broken apart by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), resulting in a shorter GLP-1 chain which has a reduced attraction for the GLP-1 receptors (Rosenberg et al., 2021).
GIP is secreted from the K cells of the small intestine after fat and, to a lesser extent, carbohydrates are ingested. GIP assists in lowering postprandial blood glucose via binding to the gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor on the pancreatic β cells. Unlike GLP-1, GIP stimulates glucagon secretion. Postprandially, over half of the active GIP is noted, but it is quickly degraded by DPP-4, leaving it with little to no glucose-lowering effect.
The incretin effect is a process by which insulin secretion is enhanced after oral carbohydrate intake when compared to carbohydrate administered intravenously (IV) (Rosenberg et al., 2021). The GLP-1 and GIP hormones account for most of the incretin effect. Over 70% of the insulin response in healthy adults is from the incretin effect. This process significantly decreased in those living with T2DM and those living with obesity (Rosenberg et al., 2021). Improving the incretin effect with administration of exogenous incretin hormones has led to the use of GLP-1 RA and dual GLP-1/GIP RA to treat T2DM and obesity.
The GLP-1 RA class of medications has multiple mechanisms of action due to the presence of GLP-1 receptors on various body organs, including those beyond the pancreas (Zhao et al., 2021).
The mechanism of action within the heart is more indirect, as there are fewer GLP-1 receptors on cardiac tissue, though it is significantly cardioprotective. Independent of the cardioprotective role of improving glycemic control, GLP-1 RAs improve cardiac and peripheral vascular endothelial and cardiac mitochondrial function, improving cardiovascular outcomes after cardiovascular events (Hullon et al., 2025).
As with other organs in the body, GLP-1 receptors are found within the kidneys. In addition to the renal benefits of improving glycemic control, the direct renal mechanism of action of GLP-1 includes a decrease in intraglomerular pressure, which induces natriuresis and reduces oxidative stress and inflammation. These direct effects, in addition to glycemic control, contribute to subsequent renal benefits by improving weight, blood pressure, and dyslipidemia (Yu et al., 2022).
Though the GI mechanisms of action are similar for all GLP-1 RA pharmacological agents, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, administration, dosing, and pharmacokinetics differ. All approved agents are to be used in conjunction with lifestyle interventions and typically are part of a multimodal treatment plan. Here, we will review the currently FDA-approved drugs in the United States.
Exenatide is approved for the treatment of T2DM in adults and children aged ten years and older and is available in both immediate-release and extended-release options. Immediate-release exenatide is available in 5-microgram (mcg) and 10-mcg doses and is administered subcutaneously twice daily, 60 minutes before the morning and evening meals. A dose increase from 5 mcg to 10 mcg can occur after one month if glycemic control is not achieved. The drug half-life is 2.4 hours for immediate-release exenatide and two weeks for extended-release exenatide. There is minimal systemic metabolism. Excretion occurs within the kidneys and is not recommended to be used in those with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 milliliters (mL)/minute/1.73 m2 (UpToDate Lexidrug, n.d.-b).
Liraglutide is approved for the treatment of T2DM in adults and children aged ten years and older. In adults with T2DM, it is also approved to reduce cardiovascular risk in those with established cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors.
Lixisenatide is approved for the treatment of T2DM in adults. This is available in 10 mcg and 20 mcg doses. It is no longer available as a stand-alone GLP-1 RA but is now only available in a fixed-ratio combination drug with insulin glargine. Lixisenatide is administered as a daily subcutaneous injection within one hour of the first meal of the day. Drug titration begins at 10 mcg daily for 14 days, and on day 15, the dose is increased to 20 mcg. The drug's half-life is approximately three hours. The metabolism of lixisenatide is via proteolytic degradation. Excretion is via the urine, requiring close monitoring for those with a GFR between 15-30 mL/minute/1.73 m². Due to limited studies, the use of lixisenatide is not recommended for GFR < 15 mL/minute/1.73 m² (UpToDate Lexidrug, n.d.-d).
Semaglutide, available in both oral and subcutaneous formulations, is approved for the treatment of T2DM in adults.
Oral semaglutide, only available for those over 18 years of age, has two different formulations now available. The R1 formulation is available in 3 mg, 7 mg, and 14 mg tablets. The R2 formulation is available in 1.5 mg, 4 mg, and 9 mg tablets. The R2 formulation has increased bioavailability and is not to be substituted with the R1 formulation on a mg-per-mg basis (Novo Nordisk, 2024). Oral semaglutide is administered once daily on an empty stomach, with four ounces of water. The user must avoid consuming food, drink, and other medications for at least 30 minutes to ensure proper absorption.
Subcutaneous semaglutide is administered once a week. Dosing for the treatment of T2DM in adults is available in 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1 mg, and 2 mg doses. Dose titration can occur every four weeks as determined by glycemic control and tolerability. For weight management in both adults and children, weekly injectable semaglutide is available in 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 1.7 mg, and 2.4 mg doses. Again, titration occurs every four weeks, determined by weight loss and tolerability. The weekly dose is administered on the same day each week, regardless of the time of day or food intake. Metabolism is via proteolytic cleavage of the peptide backbone with sequential beta-oxidation of the fatty acid side chain. The half-life is approximately one week. Excretion occurs in a small part via the urine and feces. No dose adjustments are recommended for renal impairment, though caution must be used during drug initiation and titration (UpToDate Lexidrug, n.d.-e).
Tirzepatide is a unique dual GLP-1/GIP hormone. It is a weekly subcutaneous injection used for the treatment of T2DM and weight management in adults.
Adverse reactions when taking GLP-1 RAs can range from mild to life-threatening. Here we will discuss several adverse reactions. Please refer to each drug's prescribing information for drug-specific adverse reactions and frequencies.
Allergic or hypersensitivity-type reactions have occurred. Rare cases of anaphylaxis and angioedema have been reported. Antibodies against GLP-1 RAs have also been reported. Injection site reactions are more common in this drug class than compared to insulin and are typically mild, though they can progress to cellulitis, abscess, and necrosis.
Acute pancreatitis, elevated pancreatic enzymes, and other pancreas-related risks have been studied regarding GLP-1 RAs. There has been a slight increase in the risk of acute pancreatitis. However, further studies have not identified causation or a higher risk compared to other oral agents, such as sulfonylureas. There have been reports of elevated pancreatic enzyme levels when monitored using a GLP-1 RA. This did not appear to predict episodes of acute pancreatitis. Ongoing studies are continuing to evaluate if there is an increased risk of pancreatic cancer or neuroendocrine tumors related to GLP-1 RA use. To date, no causal relationships have been noted (Ghusn & Hurtado, 2024).
Additional GI side effects include gallbladder and biliary disease. This includes cholecystitis and acute cholelithiasis. The most significant risk appears to be associated with the use of high-dose GLP-RAs for weight management. Risk was also related to the duration of therapy, with longer duration having the highest risk (Ghusn & Hurtado, 2024).
Hypoglycemia is a potential adverse reaction when added to agents with a known hypoglycemia risk, such as insulin, sulfonylureas, and meglitinides. There is a minimal risk of hypoglycemia when using GLP-1 RAs alone or with other low hypoglycemia risk agents.
The risk of acute kidney injury is low and has been noted to be secondary to severe GI symptoms resulting in dehydration. Case reports have also indicated an increase in acute kidney injury risk with severe GI symptoms and the use of other medications with a known acute kidney injury risk, including diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
Tachycardia has been noted as an adverse reaction to GLP-1 RAs. These events have not been deemed serious. Case reports have required discontinuation of the drug, particularly in individuals with heart failure, as an increased cardiac demand from tachycardia could result in adverse cardiac outcomes (Calderon et al., 2022).
The risk of medullary thyroid carcinoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 remains controversial. In rodent studies during drug development, a dose-dependent and treatment-dependent increase in thyroid C-cell tumors was observed. This did not appear to occur in primate studies. There have been case studies of medullary thyroid carcinoma; however, currently, there is no statistically significant increase in humans, although studies are still ongoing (Ghusn & Hurtado, 2024; Pasternak et al., 2024).
There has been controversy as to the risk of increased depression, suicidal ideation, or death by suicide in those taking GLP-1 RA (Salvo & Faillie, 2024). Research has currently not identified an increased risk of worsening mental health or suicide. Although more research is needed in this area, healthcare providers must be vigilant to monitor patients for any worsening mental health or suicidal ideation (Ueda et al., 2024).
Worsening diabetic retinopathy has been noted with the use of subcutaneous semaglutide. Though the exact mechanism is not clear, previous evidence has indicated that a rapid improvement of glycemic control can worsen preexisting diabetic retinopathy. The risk of worsening diabetic retinopathy appears to be dependent on patient characteristics, degree of retinopathy, and glycemic control (Dungan & DeSantis, 2025; Joo et al., 2024).
GLP-1 RAs have general contraindications and cautions, though some specific agents have additional recommendations. Please refer to each drug's prescribing information for exact contraindications and warnings (Kindel et al., 2024).
There are numerous barriers to the use of GLP-1 RA medications. Cost has become a significant barrier, with the average cost of these agents ranging from $900 to over $1300 per month. Even with adequate health insurance, the out-of-pocket costs are often unaffordable (Klein, 2024). Pharmaceutical companies are exploring possibilities for lower-cost options.
Adverse reactions are another barrier to the use of GLP-1 RAs. Even with slow titration and dietary modifications, some individuals suffer severe GI upset or other adverse events, making this class of medication intolerable. Patient education is essential when starting these agents, as it provides patients with knowledge of possible adverse reactions and guidance on when to seek medical attention for severe adverse reactions.
Recent drug shortages have also become a barrier to the use of GLP-1 RAs. Many of these agents have had sporadic shortages, causing interruptions in therapy. Due to the barrier of drug shortages, compounded and counterfeit GLP-1 RAs have been marketed to patients as alternatives.
Sustained weight loss and improved glycemic control from the use of GLP-1 RAs have multiorgan benefits as previously noted. Significant weight loss and loss of lean muscle mass can, unfortunately, harm bone density and muscle strength. As GLP-1 RAs are not approved for use in pregnancy and have a long half-life, preconception planning is imperative, as these should be stopped several months before planning pregnancy (Ducker, 2024). Although this medication class has been approved for adults since 2005, long-term data in children is still ongoing.
As previously mentioned, cost and drug shortages have created challenges to stable ongoing use of GLP-1 RAs. This risk led to the introduction of compounded and counterfeit GLP-1 RAs to the market, creating further confusion and risk. FDA-approved drugs undergo multiple safety and quality checks throughout the manufacturing process. A pharmacist modifies compounded medications to create a customized drug. Counterfeit medications are illegal copies of FDA-approved drugs. Both compounded and counterfeit GLP-1 RAs carry the risks of inaccurate dosing, unproven additives, improper dosing, and the risk of contamination. Counterfeit medications also have the risk of harmful ingredients and may even lack the active GLP-1 ingredient. It is currently recommended to use only FDA-approved GLP-1 RA agents for the treatment of obesity and T2DM (FDA, 2025).
The key to successful GLP-RA therapy starts with nurses providing effective patient education. Education on the proper administration of oral semaglutide is essential to drug effectiveness and patient compliance. If not taken properly, the effect of oral semaglutide is minimal due to reduced absorption.
Teaching proper injection technique is vital to ensure the drug is administered correctly. Subcutaneous GLP-1 RA injections can be given in the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm. The pens used to administer the injections vary between each drug, making instruction and return demonstration important in the education process.
Nurses also must instruct patients about potential side effects.
Nurses also assist in developing alternative plans to manage drug shortages. During drug shortages, patients may need to use alternate dosing strategies or lower the dose of the GLP-RA to extend the time to the next refill. Depending on insurance coverage and cost, nurses may need to assist patients in switching to a different GLP-1 RA agent. Some patients may need to stop GLP-RA therapy and use an alternate glycose-lowering pharmacotherapy until the shortage has ended and the GLP-1 RA can be reinitiated (Whitley et al., 2023).
The discovery of the incretin effect has led to the development of the revolutionary GLP-1 RA class of medications. Primary for treating obesity and T2DM, tirzepatide is also FDA-approved to treat obstructive sleep apnea. GLP-1 RAs have multiorgan benefits that extend beyond weight loss and improved glycemic control. The available GLP-1 RAs have similar mechanisms of action and adverse events. Through patient assessments, nurses can identify and address cautions or contraindications when prescribing these pharmacologic agents. Nurses play a vital role in providing proper education to enhance drug effectiveness, manage expectations, and mitigate side effects.
Cassandra is a 64-year-old female seen today in the outpatient clinic for follow-up. She has a past medical history of:
She is following up in the clinic today after starting tirzepatide three months ago. She has been titrated up to the 5 mg weekly dose. Since starting this current dose, she reports weight loss and "better blood sugar numbers" compared to three months ago. She also complains that giving the injection in her abdomen makes her anxious and asks where else she can give the injection. She tells you she typically will have some leaking at the injection site after she gives the injection.
Today's lab results and vital signs:
She is happy with her weight loss and glycemic control, although she reports experiencing nausea anytime she tries to eat. Due to nausea, she is skipping meals and not exercising because she does not have energy. She denies any fever, chest pain, abdominal pain, constipation, or diarrhea. Her physical exam is within normal limits. After obtaining the history and physical exam, you formulate an education plan for Cassandra.
You focus on the most important points that arose during the visit, which include her side effect of nausea, which is causing her to skip meals, lack of physical activity, and injection site concerns.
You educate Cassandra on the mechanism of action of the GLP-1 RA pharmacological class and the etiology behind her symptoms of nausea. You explain that skipping meals is not recommended, but instead recommend she try smaller, low-fat meals while trying to eat more slowly. She is also instructed to call the office if she has continued nausea even after implementing these diet modifications.
Next, you discuss how skipping meals has led to decreased energy consumption, resulting in decreased physical activity. If the diet modifications are successful, she should expect to have more energy to get back to her previous exercise routine. Again, she is educated to call the office if this does not improve.
Additionally, her injection concerns are common when using subcutaneous GLP-1 RA agents. You review the tirzepatide instructions for use with her. You show her that tirzepatide can be given in the abdomen, thighs, or the backs of the arms. You have her demonstrate an injection with a demonstration pen. You realize she immediately removes the pen from the injection pad. Per the instructions for use, you review with her that she will need to hold the pen against her body for ten seconds before removing it. She is educated to call the office if she continues to have any difficulty with giving the injection or if she continues to have any leakage from the injection site.
You call Cassandra in six weeks to check in and ask if she has any concerns. She reports that with the recommended diet modifications, her nausea is now gone, and she is back to walking regularly. She is now injecting in the thigh and holding the pen for at least ten seconds before removing it. She reports she has only had one further episode of leaking from the injection site and is now very happy with her treatment plan.
CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.