≥ 92% of participants will know the comprehensive evaluation and management of adults living with obesity.

CEUFast, Inc. is accredited as a provider of nursing continuing professional development by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ANCC Provider number #P0274.
≥ 92% of participants will know the comprehensive evaluation and management of adults living with obesity.
After completing this course, the learner will be able to:
Over 890 million adults worldwide are living with obesity (World Health Organization [WHO], 2025). Obesity was deemed a chronic disease in 2013. Despite advances in treatment options, the obesity epidemic in the United States continues to escalate. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Emmerich et al., 2024), the prevalence of obesity in the adult population is now at a staggering 40.3%, with the rates of severe obesity rising to 9.4%. The obesity rates did not differ between men and women, but for those with severe obesity, the prevalence was higher in women (Emmerich et al., 2024).
Body mass index (BMI) is the standard measure for diagnosing obesity in adults. BMI is a calculation recommended by the WHO and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for classifying obesity. Table 1 breaks down the classification of weight by BMI.
BMI = Body weight (in kg) ÷ height (in meters squared)
BMI calculator
This classification system is specific to White, Hispanic, and Black individuals. Notably, Asian individuals have different BMI cutoffs when classifying obesity (Bajaj et al., 2024). Thus, assessing the patient’s race and ethnicity is imperative to correct diagnosis and treatment of obesity.
| BMI Category | BMI (kg/m2) | BMI Asian (kg/m2) |
|---|---|---|
| 18.5 – 22.9 | ||
| 23-27.5 | ||
| 30 or > | ||
| 30 - < 35 | |
| 35 - < 40 | |
| 40 or > | |
| (CDC, 2024b; Bajaj et al., 2025) | ||
Previously, obesity was thought to be a condition based on calorie intake versus calorie expenditure, which does not acknowledge the full picture of obesity. The pathophysiology of obesity is multifactorial, with complex interactions among genetic, hormonal, behavioral, and environmental factors that affect energy intake and expenditure.
Excess energy, known as calories, is stored as adipose tissue. Adipose tissue comprises mainly white adipose tissue and, to a lesser extent, brown adipose tissue.
White adipose tissue stores glucose and lipids, in the form of triglycerides, and acts as an endocrine organ, secreting adipokines that have adverse downstream effects on inflammation, insulin sensitivity, and appetite (Dowker-Key et al., 2024). As white adipose tissue enlarges, it continues to release leptin and other adipokines, which then disrupt hypothalamic function, creating resistance to the satiety hormonal response.
In addition to hormones released by adipose tissue, additional hormones such as leptin, ghrelin, and incretins contribute to adult obesity by altering hypothalamic function. Ghrelin is a hormone secreted by the stomach during fasting and increases hunger.
Currently, hundreds of genes are associated with obesity. Monogenic obesity conditions result from mutations in a single gene, such as Prader-Willi, Cohen, and Bardet-Biedl syndromes. These rare conditions typically present in early childhood and are not influenced by environmental factors (Masood & Moorthy, 2023). Most cases of adult obesity are polygenic, reflecting alterations in the genetic expression of multiple genes and being intensely influenced by inherited and environmental factors. Research has demonstrated a strong correlation between obese parents and lifetime obesity risk in children, suggesting both a genetic and environmental influence on obesity pathophysiology (Mikkelsen et al., 2025).
Insufficient sleep and disruptions of the body’s circadian rhythm result in hormonal alterations that can contribute to obesity (Papatriantafyllou et al., 2022). Poor sleep increases ghrelin levels and reduces leptin levels. This creates an imbalance of hunger and satiety. These hormones are also disrupted by alterations in the circadian rhythm, such as those associated with shift work.
An environment with ample access to high-calorie foods and limited access to low-calorie, high-fiber foods while promoting a sedentary lifestyle is termed an obesogenic environment (Meijer et al., 2024). Other environmental influences contributing to obesity include exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, low socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and medications with a side effect of weight gain (Meijer et al., 2024).
Adults living with obesity have an increased risk of obesity-related complications and obesity-related diseases, leading to higher mortality levels than in the non-obese population. It has been estimated that obesity-related premature deaths per year in the United States outnumber the premature deaths caused by smoking (Ward et. al., 2022). Morbidity related to adult obesity has significant negative financial and quality-of-life implications.
Just as the pathophysiology of obesity is multifactorial, obesity-related adverse health outcomes affect multiple organ systems. Often, obesity treatment can improve some of these adverse health outcomes. Table 2 identifies several obesity-related medical conditions.
Type 2 diabetes is a growing obesity-related condition. Type 2 diabetes results from insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction. Insulin is a hormone excreted from the pancreatic β-cells to lower blood glucose. Excess adipose tissue increases proinflammatory cytokines and free fatty acids (FFA), which impair insulin's ability to enter cells (insulin resistance), thereby raising blood glucose levels. The elevated blood glucose levels trigger the pancreas to release more insulin. Excess lipids in the bloodstream that cannot be stored in adipose tissue also increase insulin resistance. Given these mechanisms, pancreatic β-cell hypertrophy results in β-cell dysfunction and reduced insulin production (Klein et al., 2022).
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is a common finding in those with obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. If not addressed, MASLD can lead to Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH), liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. MASLD is caused by excessive accumulation of lipids in the liver, coupled with insulin resistance. These processes then lead to hepatocyte dysfunction, causing liver inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial changes, thereby worsening MASLD to MASH, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and carcinoma (Dua et al., 2025).
Obesity results in chronic exposure of the heart and blood vessels to proinflammatory substances. This ongoing inflammation, coupled with increased circulating fluid volume and dyslipidemia, leads to cardiovascular conditions such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, CVA, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and thrombotic events (Norton et al., 2024; Jin et al., 2023). FFA enters the cardiac muscle cells, and the accumulation of excess adipose tissue surrounding the heart contributes to cardiac dysfunction, including left ventricular hypertrophy in adults with obesity (Jin et al., 2023).
Pulmonary conditions directly related to obesity in adults include obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), asthma, and hypoventilation syndrome. In adults with obesity, excess adipose tissue narrows the airways and induces a proinflammatory response, leading to airway inflammation and impaired gas exchange. Additionally, the smaller airway diameter relative to lung tissue volume results in limited lung volumes. Together, these factors result in a higher incidence of asthma and worsening of existing asthma in those with obesity (Fröhlich, 2025). Excess adipose tissue in the chest, neck, and abdominal cavity obstructs the airway during sleep in OSA. Similarly, hypoventilation syndrome is observed in obesity due to excess adipose tissue, also causing shallow breathing and hypoventilation, though it is continuous during both wakefulness and sleep (Fröhlich, 2025).
|
Obesity is a complex chronic disease that requires a comprehensive clinical assessment provided by obesity informed healthcare providers. The assessment of adults living with obesity starts with the complete health history.
A comprehensive physical exam, found in Table 3, includes:
Skin: Common skin findings in obesity include acanthosis nigricans and skin tags, both of which are linked to insulin resistance. Hirsutism, or excessive hair growth on the face, chest, abdomen, and thighs in women, can be associated with conditions like PCOS. Facial plethora and violaceous striae (wide, purple stretch marks) on the abdomen, axilla, thighs, and breasts can be associated with conditions such as hypercortisolism. Skin breakdown, such as pressure ulcers, can occur with immobility. Lower-extremity skin abnormalities, such as skin discoloration in chronic venous insufficiency and cellulitis, can occur in obesity. Skin folds can retain moisture, leading to a rash or even candida infection (Taira et al., 2024).
Cardiopulmonary: Cardiac assessment includes identifying abnormal heart sounds, such as murmurs or carotid bruit. Evaluation for heart failure includes the assessment of lung sounds for crackles, lower extremity edema, jugular venous distention (JVD), and displaced apical impulse, as well as S3 and S4 heart sounds. Assessing the cardiac rhythm is essential for identifying arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation. Reduced lung sounds on physical examination may indicate reduced lung capacity due to obesity.
Abdomen: The abdominal assessment can be difficult in adults living with obesity, but it is vital to identifying obesity related conditions. Liver palpation can identify hepatomegaly. Palpation of the abdomen can reveal a pulsatile mass due to an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Non-pulsatile masses palpated in the abdomen could identify a cancerous process or an abdominal hernia. Ascites can result from heart failure and liver disease in adults living with obesity.
Musculoskeletal: The musculoskeletal examination is performed to identify obesity-related conditions, including osteoarthritis with joint pain, joint deformity, and limited joint range of motion. Evaluation of extremity muscle wasting can raise the suspicion of Cushing’s syndrome.
| Body System | Obesity-Related Assessment Findings |
|---|---|
Skin Tags Hirsutism | |
| Cardiopulmonary | Cardiac Murmur Carotid Bruit Pulmonary Crackles Diminished Lung Sounds Lower Extremity Edema Jugular Venous Distention (JVD) Displaced Apical Pulse S3 or S4 Heart Sounds Irregular Rate or Rhythm |
| Abdomen | Hepatomegaly Pulsatile Mass Abdominal Bruit Non-Pulsatile Mass |
| Musculoskeletal | Joint Pain Joint Swelling Joint Deformity Muscle Loss in Extremities |
| Psychological | Abnormality in Mood or Affect Interaction with Healthcare Provider |
Laboratory evaluation of obesity includes assessment of fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, liver function tests, electrolytes, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and a lipid panel. Additional targeted laboratory tests may be performed, as indicated, to assess the status of pre-existing obesity-related complications and diseases. Other diagnostic tests that may be considered based on abnormal clinical examination findings include joint imaging, electrocardiogram, sleep study, and noninvasive liver evaluation.
Nutritional counseling is a key component of reducing caloric excess in the treatment of obesity and necessitates referral to a dietitian. Reducing total caloric intake by 500-700 kcal/day, while aiming to consume 1,000-1,500 kcal/day, has been shown to be an effective strategy for weight loss (Kim, 2020). Nutritional counseling is foundational to all obesity treatments, including lifestyle interventions, pharmacologic therapy, and surgical interventions.
The Dietary Guidelines for Americans emphasize protein, fiber, and limiting highly processed foods. The current U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], 2026) dietary guidelines recommend:
It is recommended to avoid highly processed foods, added sugars, and non-nutritive sweeteners. Also, it is recommended to avoid sugar-sweetened drinks.
When people think of limiting sugar in their diet, they typically think of sweet treats; however, sugar can be hidden in many everyday foods, without the consumer even realizing it. While sugar is naturally found in foods such as fresh fruit and dairy, it is often added to foods to enhance flavor and texture, or as a preservative to increase shelf life. It is important to check food nutritional labels for sources of added sugar. In the ingredient list, look for different names for added sugars, such as cane sugar, corn syrup, high-fructose corn syrup, rice syrup, molasses, honey, and agave. Most words that end with “-ose” contain sugar such as glucose, fructose, maltose, dextrose, and sucrose (CDC, 2026).
|

Exercise is a well-established modality to improve aerobic capacity, resting heart rate, blood pressure, and overall metabolic health. There are many different approaches to treating obesity with physical activity. As with nutrition interventions, physical activity interventions for treating obesity must align with the patient’s personal preferences, beliefs, and physical capabilities. A person with obesity may have numerous comorbidities that create difficulty with physical activity. This can be especially true with osteoarthritis of the joints or spine, resulting in pain if the activity is too intense or increased too quickly. This may lead the person to feel discouraged or incapable of exercising. It is important that a person gradually build up to the recommended activity levels.
Research demonstrates that the intensity and duration of physical activity affect weight loss. While engaging in aerobic exercise for 30 minutes per week was associated with modest reduction in body weight, waist circumference, and body fat in adults with obesity, aerobic training exceeding 150 minutes per week at a moderate intensity or higher was needed to achieve clinically significant reductions (Jayedi et al., 2024).
Aerobic exercise has been shown to decrease body weight, waist circumference, and body fat, with decreases that are linearly related to increasing duration of aerobic exercise at moderate to vigorous intensities, up to 300 minutes per week.
Measuring the efficacy of resistance training has been challenging because clinical measurements tend to rely on overall body weight and BMI rather than body composition, which do not differentiate between lean and fat mass or between adipose deposits in visceral and subcutaneous tissues. Resistance training can result in slight increases in body weight due to increased lean body mass, which is highly associated with metabolic health and physical function (Lopez et al, 2022). In a meta-analysis, Lopez et al. (2022) found that supervised resistance-based exercise programs significantly reduced body fat percentage and whole-body fat mass in participants with obesity, regardless of age or sex. Resistance-based exercise combined with caloric restriction was found to be the most effective training intervention. Additionally, regional adiposity measures decreased significantly, while lean mass increased with resistance-based exercise. Body weight and BMI were significantly reduced in adult age categories. Overall, both resistance training alone and resistance training combined with aerobic training were found to significantly reduce fat mass; however, resistance-based exercise combined with calorie restriction was the most effective for decreasing body fat percentage and whole-body fat mass in participants who were overweight or obese (Lopez et al., 2022).
Group-based exercise programs, or programs supervised by trained professionals, have been shown to be consistently associated with higher exercise adherence rates among adults with obesity (de Sena Anchieta Rodrigue et al., 2026)
Sleep quality and duration are additional important factors to consider in obesity management. Studies have found that adults who get less than 6 hours of sleep per night have higher BMI and WC than those who sleep longer (Direksunthorn, 2025). This sleep deficiency is also associated with increased caloric intake, weight gain, and metabolic dysregulation (Direksunthorn, 2025). Studies have shown that increasing sleep duration can reduce caloric intake, leading to weight loss (Tasali et al., 2022). Referral to a sleep medicine specialist for sleep evaluation is key to addressing underlying conditions, such as OSA. A referral to an occupational therapist may also be beneficial, as sleep is considered a restorative occupation. Occupational therapists treat sleep disorders by addressing behavioral, environmental, and physical factors that impact rest; suggesting environmental modifications; helping develop healthy sleep habits and routines; educating on stress-reduction techniques that promote more restful sleep; and incorporating sensory integration to support rest and recuperation.
The use of mental health professionals in the treatment of obesity is essential to long-term success. Mental health professionals not only assess for and treat co-morbid conditions such as anxiety and depression but also work with patients to identify causes of overeating. Current modalities used by mental health professionals to treat obesity related mental health conditions include cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing (Hammer et al., 2024). It is recommended to have a psychiatric evaluation prior to metabolic/bariatric surgery to ensure the patient is optimized for a life-altering surgery and to limit weight regain.
There are now numerous pharmacologic agents used to treat obesity and obesity related conditions. Here, we will review the FDA-approved pharmacologic agents used to treat obesity in conjunction with nutritional and physical activity interventions.
Healthcare providers must have a thorough understanding of all available pharmacological agents for the treatment of obesity, including their mechanisms of action, side-effect profiles, and contraindications. This knowledge and clinical expertise can help patients make evidence-based, personalized treatment decisions.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (RA) are incretin mimetics that slow gastric emptying, decrease food intake, increase insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner, and decrease inappropriate glucagon secretion by acting on GLP-1 receptors throughout the body. Due to their multifactorial mechanisms of action and effects on the treatment and prevention of obesity-related diseases, GLP-1 RAs are the preferred first-line agents for the treatment of obesity in adults. Here, we discuss FDA-approved GLP-1 RAs for the treatment of obesity.
Liraglutide is a chronic weight management medication option in adults with obesity. Liraglutide is administered by subcutaneous injection, starting at 0.6 mg once daily. Titration can occur every 7 days and is as follows: 1.2 mg, 1.8 mg, 2.4 mg, and a maximum dose of 3 mg. (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026a). Studies have noted a 9.2% weight loss. Liraglutide trials have demonstrated the prevention of type 2 diabetes, improvements in hemoglobin A1c and blood pressure, prevention of cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes, and benefit in MASLD (Nadolsky et al., 2025). It is to be used with caution in those with severe renal impairment and those with liver impairment.
Semaglutide is another chronic weight management medication option for adults with obesity. Semaglutide is now available as a once-a-week subcutaneous injection or as a daily oral pill. Dosing for the weekly subcutaneous injection is initiated at 0.25 mg once a week for 4 weeks. Titration can occur every 4 weeks, and the titration schedule is as follows: 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 1.7 mg, 2.4 mg. Dosing for oral semaglutide starts at 1.5 mg daily and is titrated every 30 days to 4 mg, 9 mg, and a maximum of 25 mg (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026b). Weight loss for injectable semaglutide is 16.9% and 13.6% with oral semaglutide (Nadolsky et al., 2025; Wharton et al., 2025). Injectable semaglutide has shown benefits in preventing type 2 diabetes, improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, lowering blood pressure, preventing cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes, and benefiting MASLD (Nadolsky et al., 2025). Oral semaglutide has been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk in obese adults (Novo Nordisk, 2025). No dosing adjustment is recommended for kidney impairment. However, it should not be used in those with pre-existing liver disease, in those who are malnourished, or in those who are sarcopenic (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026b).
Tirzepatide is a GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist used for weight management. It is like other GLP-1 RA medications in its mechanism of action, though it exhibits a more pronounced effect due to dual agonism at GLP-1 and GIP receptors. Tirzepatide is a once-weekly subcutaneous injection. Dosing starts at 2.5 mg once weekly, and titration can occur every 4 weeks. The titration dosing schedule is as follows: 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, 12.5 mg, and 15 mg. (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026c). Weight loss with tirzepatide has been reported at 22% (Nadolsky et al., 2025). Tirzepatide has demonstrated benefits in preventing type 2 diabetes, improving hemoglobin A1c in those with type 2 diabetes, improving obstructive sleep apnea, improving hypertension, and improving MASLD. Studies are currently ongoing evaluating the ASCVD risk reduction in those with type 2 diabetes using tirzepatide (Nadolsky et al., 2025). No adjustment is necessary in those with kidney or liver impairment (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026c).
Common side effects of GLP-1 RA and GLP-1 RA/GIP agents include primarily gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea. GI symptoms must be evaluated, as volume depletion, dehydration, and worsening kidney impairment have been noted. Headache and fatigue are also noted. Although blood pressure has improved, tachycardia is a potential side effect of this class of medications; heart rate should be monitored.
Less often discussed side effects of GLP-1 medications are the effects on musculoskeletal tissue and bone health. A growing number of studies demonstrate that GLP-1RA medications create a significant reduction in lean body mass, raising concerns related to the negative effects on skeletal muscle mass, sarcopenia, and muscle function. Despite the overall reduction in lean body mass, additional research has observed reduced fatty infiltration into muscle, suggesting improved muscle composition with an appropriate decrease in muscle mass (Gato et al., 2025). Studies on bone health demonstrate that GLP-1 RA medications may support bone health by increasing bone formation, improving microarchitecture, and reducing fracture risk by 32–38% in patients with existing bone density disorders. While rapid weight loss from these drugs can cause bone density loss, studies suggest a net protective effect or neutral impact, often enhanced when combined with exercise (Jensen et al., 2024). However, according to Gato et al. (2025), the “impact may depend on the patient's age, metabolic status, treatment dose and duration, and the degree of weight reduction.”
Orlistat is a reversible inhibitor of gastric and pancreatic lipases, which inhibits dietary fat absorption by 30% (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026d). Since fat absorption is altered, fat is expelled in the stool, and consequently, less fat and fewer calories are absorbed. Orlistat is available by prescription (120 mg with meals) and over the counter (60 mg with meals). Orlistat has been shown to result in a 4% weight loss, prevent type 2 diabetes, and lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels (Nadolsky et al., 2025).
Though Orlistat can be a chronic medication, adherence is limited to common side effects. Side effects include fecal incontinence, oily fecal discharge, abdominal pain, frequent bowel movement, and fecal urgency, particularly after a high-fat meal. Due to reduced fat absorption, deficiencies of fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K can occur and may require supplementation. Monitoring includes monitoring liver and renal function tests. Orlistat should not be used in individuals with malabsorption disorders (Nadolsky et al., 2025; UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026d). Monitor for acute kidney injury due to oxalate nephropathy and nephrolithiasis in those using Orlistat (Nadolsky et al., 2025; UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026d).
Phentermine is a short-term pharmacologic option for treating obesity in adults. It is a sympathomimetic amine that stimulates the hypothalamus to release norepinephrine. Phentermine is similar to amphetamines in that it increases norepinephrine levels, reducing appetite and increasing energy, thereby leading to a calorie deficit. Phentermine (excluding Lomaira) is administered as 15 to 18.75 mg once daily or 30 to 37.5 mg in 1 or 2 divided doses. Lomaira dosing is 8 mg 3 times daily, 30 min before meals (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026e). Studies have demonstrated a 5-6% weight loss, though its use is limited to up to 12 weeks (Nadolsky et al., 2025; UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026e).
Phentermine can increase heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac workload, potentially leading to cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias. It is contraindicated in those with cardiovascular disease, hyperthyroidism, glaucoma, pregnancy, the use of an MAOI inhibitor in the previous 14 days, and those with a history of drug abuse. Due to CNS stimulation, side effects can also include anxiety, irritability, and even psychosis. Dosage should be adjusted for renal insufficiency and avoided in those with an eGFR <15 mL/minute/1.73 m2. (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026e).
Phentermine-Topiramate ER is a chronic pharmacologic option for adults with obesity. Adding Topiramate ER to phentermine adds a multifactorial mechanism of action for weight loss. Topiramate ER, commonly used for seizures and migraine treatment, reduces food intake with increasing satiety, disrupts the reward pathway, reduces food intake, and increases thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue (Wajid et al., 2023). The phentermine component is an immediate-release formulation, while the topiramate is an extended-release formulation. Dosing starts at phentermine/topiramate 3.75 mg/23 mg and is titrated after 14 days to phentermine 7.5 mg/topiramate 46 mg once daily for 12 weeks. If weight loss is not ≥ 3%, either taper off or escalate the dose to phentermine 11.25 mg/topiramate 69 mg once daily for 14 days. Then, if needed, increase to a max dose of 15 mg/92 mg. At maximum dosing, if ≥ 5% of baseline body weight has not been lost, discontinue therapy with a gradual taper (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026f). Weight loss with phentermine/topiramate ER ranges from 3.8% to 9.9% in studies, and the amount of weight loss appears to be dose-dependent (Nadolsky et al., 2025). This combination of phentermine with topiramate ER has demonstrated weight reduction, prevention of type 2 diabetes, and improved glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes (Nadolsky et al., 2025).
Adverse effects of phentermine/topiramate ER contain the same side effect profile as phentermine but also include paresthesia, dizziness, constipation, dry mouth, fatigue, blurred vision, mood changes, and mental clouding that are more specific to topiramate (Nadolsky et al., 2025). Contraindications include all of those listed for phentermine, including a known hypersensitivity to topiramate. Dose adjustments are required for creatinine clearance <50 mL/min. In moderate liver impairment, the maximum recommended dose is phentermine 7.5 mg/topiramate 46 mg once daily (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026f).
Naltrexone ER/Bupropion ER is another chronic pharmacologic agent used to treat obesity in adults. The mechanism of action is not clearly understood. Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist, while bupropion weakly inhibits the uptake of dopamine and norepinephrine. Together, these mechanisms appear to affect the appetite center and disrupt the brain's reward pathway (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026g). Initial dosing is naltrexone 8 mg/bupropion 90 mg once a day in the morning for 1 week. Increase weekly as tolerated. Titrate up to 1 tablet twice a day for 1 week, then 2 tablets in the morning and 1 tablet in the evening for 1 week, then 2 tablets twice a day. The maximum dose is four tablets per day, with a total daily dose of naltrexone ER 32 mg/bupropion ER 360 mg. Consider stopping the agent if weight loss is <4-5% of baseline after 3 months of use (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026g). Studies have reported 4.2-5.2% weight loss and improved glycemic control in those living with type 2 diabetes (Nadolsky et al., 2025).
Common side effects of naltrexone ER/bupropion ER include nausea, vomiting, constipation, headache, insomnia, diarrhea, anxiety, and sleep disturbance (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026g). Contraindications to the use of this agent include those who are using chronic opioids, opioid agonists, or partial opioid agonists, or those in acute opioid withdrawal. Also, do not use in those with uncontrolled hypertension, current or history of seizure disorder, abrupt drug or alcohol withdrawal, or use of MAOIs in the past 14 days. Monitor patients closely for mood changes, worsening anxiety or depression, and suicidal ideation (Nadolsky et al., 2025; UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026g). Moderate to severe kidney impairment and moderate hepatic impairment require lowering the maximum dose of naltrexone to 8 mg/bupropion 90 mg twice a day (UpToDate Lexidrug, 2026g).
| Drug | Percent Weight Loss | Dosing |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide | 9.2% | 0.6 mg x 7 days 1.2 mg x 7 days 1.8 mg |
| Semaglutide | Injectable: 16.9% Oral: 13.6% | Injectable: 0.25 mg x 4 weeks 0.5 mg x 4 weeks 1 mg x 4 weeks 1.7 mg x 4 weeks 2.4 mg Oral: 1.5 mg x 30 days 4 mg x 30 days 9 mg x 30 days 25 mg |
| Tirzepatide | 22% | 2.5 mg x 4 weeks 5 mg x 4 weeks 7.5 mg x 4 weeks 10 mg x 4 weeks 12.5 mg x 4 weeks 15 mg |
| Orlistat | 4% | 60 mg with meals (over the counter) 120 mg with meals (prescription) |
| Phentermine | 5-6% | Excluding Lomaira: 15 to 18.75 mg once daily or 30 to 37.5 mg in 1 or 2 divided doses Lomaira: 8 mg 3 times a day, 30 min before meals |
| Phentermine-Topiramate ER | 3.8% to 9.9% | Phentermine 3.75 mg/topiramate 23 mg once daily x 2 weeks, then Phentermine 7.5 mg/topiramate 46 mg once daily for 12 weeks. If needed, then increase to: Phentermine 11.25 mg/topiramate 69 mg once daily x 2 weeks, then if needed, increase to Phentermine 15 mg/topiramate 92 mg once daily |
| Naltrexone ER/Bupropion ER | 4.2%-5.2% | Naltrexone 8 mg/bupropion 90 mg daily 1 tab daily x 1 week 1 tablet twice daily x 1 week 2 tablets in the morning and 1 tablet in the evening x 1 week 2 tablets twice daily Maximum dose: 4 tablets/day (naltrexone 32 mg/bupropion 360 mg) |
The recommendation for surgical intervention to treat obesity in adults was updated in 2022. Previously, the recommendations for metabolic and bariatric surgeries were a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2, a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 with an obesity-related condition, or a BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2 with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (Nadolsky et al., 2025).
Metabolic/bariatric procedures are classified as either restrictive, malabsorptive, or a combination of the two. Restrictive procedures reduce the size of the stomach to limit food intake. Malabsorptive procedures re-route the small intestine by reducing calorie and other nutrient absorption. Procedures that combine restrictive and malabsorptive features create a smaller stomach and reroute the small intestine, resulting in a more robust caloric deficit.
The most common options for metabolic or bariatric surgery and endoscopic procedures, as endorsed by the ASMBS, include (American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery [ASMBS], 2025; Public Education Committee, 2021):

Acute postoperative medical and surgical complications of metabolic/bariatric procedures include surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, infection, gastrointestinal leak, small bowel obstruction, marginal ulcer, and hemorrhage (Lim, 2025). The subsequent nausea, vomiting, and poor hydration post-operatively can lead to dehydration and acute kidney injury (Lim, 2025).
Postoperatively, a modified diet is required to minimize surgical complications. The diet gradually advances, though it requires long-term dietary modifications. The assistance of a dietitian can help ensure the successful implementation of a healthy diet. It is essential that the patient adhere to the surgeon’s dietary recommendations.
Dumping syndrome (DS) can be an acute or long-term complication of metabolic/bariatric surgery, which results in post-bariatric hypoglycemia. DS occurs either early, within the first hour after eating, or late, 1-3 hours after eating.
Long-term follow-up is recommended at least annually after metabolic/bariatric procedures to evaluate for possible complications, vitamin or mineral deficiencies, and weight regain. The follow-up also highlights the need for multidisciplinary care. Long-term nutritional counseling can help minimize weight regain and ensure adequate intake of micro- and macronutrients. Exercise, including strength training, to maintain muscle and bone strength, can be facilitated by a trainer or physical therapist. Additionally, the use of a mental health professional is vital to the long-term success of weight loss after metabolic/bariatric procedures.
Weight bias is considered the negative attitude of others toward those with obesity regarding their weight. This negative attitude is rooted in the belief that obesity is entirely within one’s control.
Adults living with obesity experience weight bias and stigma within hospitals and healthcare clinics. It is recommended that these healthcare areas be supportive environments to prevent embarrassment. Healthcare systems and clinics can create a supportive environment by including larger gowns and blood pressure cuffs. Scales must also be large enough to accommodate adults living with obesity and ensure accurate weight measurements. Scales can be placed in private areas to reduce stigma and shame. Providing larger chairs in waiting and exam rooms, as well as appropriately sized exam tables, ensures a comfortable experience and equitable access to care for individuals with obesity.
Obesity is a common chronic health condition amongst adults in the US. Obesity is a complex, chronic disease and is vastly more complicated than the previous calories-in vs calories-out theory. Just as the disease itself is multifactorial, the layers of treatment are varied. However, all options require long-term commitment from the patient and a long-term relationship with the healthcare provider. Using clinical expertise, healthcare providers can assist patients in shared decision-making to identify the most appropriate course of action for weight loss and reduction in obesity-related complications.
Mr. Perez is a 52-year-old Hispanic male who presents to the primary care clinic for his annual physical examination. He is 6 ft tall and 285 lb. His BMI is 38.6 kg/m², classifying him as having class II obesity. He has a medical history of dyslipidemia, hypertension, OSA, MASLD, osteoarthritis of the knees, and prediabetes. He is currently taking lisinopril 20 mg daily, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg daily, atorvastatin 40 mg daily, and metformin 500 mg twice a day. He uses his CPAP nightly. He has a sedentary job and admits he does not exercise. He does not eat breakfast and relies on fast food for lunch. Dinner is often a dish made of rice and beans. He does not like many vegetables. He drinks 1-2 cans of soda per day.
The physical exam reveals a male patient who appears to be his stated age. He has acanthosis nigricans on the posterior neck with skin tags. His lungs are clear throughout. Cardiac rate and rhythm are normal, without murmur. No S3 or S4 heart sounds heard. The abdomen is obese but non-tender, with no abnormal masses or abdominal bruits. He has a limited range of motion in both knees, with crepitus noted. There is also medial joint line tenderness in both knees.
His lab work and vital signs are as follows:
After obtaining Mr. Perez's permission to discuss his weight, you present him with the obesity classification chart. He says he has tried to lose weight in the past, but “nothing has ever worked”. He reports that both of his parents were overweight, as are all five of his siblings. He reports his brother just had an MI, and he is afraid that if he does not do something about his weight, he may be next.
You discuss with Mr. Perez his class II obesity and his current obesity-related complications. You also discuss the possibility of worsening complications if weight gain continues. You discuss with him the etiology of obesity, including his genetic predisposition, given his family history of obesity, as well as his high-risk ethnicity. He reports that he is highly motivated to begin making changes but is unsure where to start. With his permission, you offer to refer him to a local dietitian and physical therapy. Before he leaves the office, he makes a goal to reduce soda intake from 1-2 per day to 1-2 per week.
Mr. Perez follows up 3 months later, weighing 278 lb. He has completely discontinued soda and now drinks water or unsweetened tea. He walks twice per week. Despite dietary changes and exercise, he reports that his weight has plateaued. You discuss with him the options for pharmacologic therapy or surgical intervention. He would like to avoid surgery at this time but is very interested in pharmacologic therapy. You discuss the available medications, both short-term and long-term, with Mr. Perez. Using shared decision making, the plan is to start tirzepatide at 2.5 mg subcutaneous once a week and titrate every 4 weeks as tolerated.
He was able to titrate the tirzepatide up to 15 mg once a week. After 6 months on tirzepatide 15 mg once a week, Mr. Perez follows up in the clinic, weighing 225 lb. His vital signs and lab work now demonstrate:
He has continued working with the dietician and has found several vegetables that he likes. The dietitian has helped him strike a balance between a healthy diet and his Hispanic heritage in his cooking. Unfortunately, due to osteoarthritis of his knees, he still cannot walk more than two days per week. He plans to undergo bilateral knee replacements soon. He aims to walk a 5k by next summer. He wishes to continue treatment with tirzepatide long-term.
Wanda is a 45-year-old female who was referred to physical therapy for strengthening, functional training, and weight-loss exercises, primarily because increased body weight had begun to interfere with her daily life. Her primary care physician has medically cleared her for participation in moderately intense exercise.
During the initial evaluation, Wanda gave the physical therapist permission to discuss her weight and related problems. She reported persistent knee pain when walking, frequent fatigue during moderate activities, and repeated difficulty maintaining exercise routines. She identified three main goals: to lose weight safely, reduce knee discomfort, and build the endurance needed for activities of daily living. Wanda does not currently have access to a gym, but expressed interest in joining one of the nearby low-cost gyms, which also has a heated pool.
The physical therapist conducted a comprehensive assessment that included a functional movement screen, lower-extremity strength testing, resting cardiovascular measurements, and a six-minute walk test in which she covered 380 meters. The evaluation revealed significant deconditioning, weakness in the quadriceps and hip musculature, and low aerobic capacity; factors that contributed to excess joint stress and early fatigue during movement.
A 24-week rehabilitation and conditioning program was designed to address these findings. For the first 12 weeks, the patient attended two supervised sessions per week, transitioning later to one supervised session combined with a structured home program. The strengthening component began immediately and continued throughout the full 24 weeks, focusing on building lower-extremity and core strength to improve joint stability, metabolism, and functional mobility. Early exercises included sit-to-stand progressions, resistance-band hip strengthening, and core stabilization. As Wanda’s tolerance improved, leg-press exercises and progressively higher step-ups were added. Resistance and difficulty increased every 2 to 3 weeks, provided the technique and symptom response remained appropriate.
Aerobic conditioning was introduced concurrently but progressed gradually. During the first month, the patient performed 15–20 minutes of treadmill walking or recumbent cycling at low-to-moderate intensity in the clinic. By weeks 5-12, she was able to sustain 25–35 minutes at moderate intensity. Wanda decided to join her local gym and was able to incorporate the recumbent cycling or treadmill regularly, 3-5 times a week, especially as the frequency of her therapy visits decreased. This helped build consistency and long-term compliance with her new exercise habits. In the final phase of the program, sessions expanded to 35–45 minutes and incorporated interval-based walking or cycling. Intensity was maintained within approximately 50–70% of heart-rate reserve and monitored using perceived-exertion scales to ensure safe progression.
Wanda was also instructed in water exercises for strengthening and aerobic fitness that she could include when her knees were more painful. This allowed her to still incorporate exercise, when she would have previously declined to exercise because of pain.
Behavioral support played a key role in the program’s success. The therapist and patient set weekly activity goals, tracked daily movement using her smartwatch step tracker, and discussed pacing strategies, recovery, and methods for gradually increasing lifestyle activity outside formal exercise sessions. The patient also participated in nutrition counseling through an external referral, helping align dietary changes with the physical activity program.
After 24 weeks, Wanda demonstrated substantial improvements across multiple measures. Her weight decreased to 222 pounds (101 kg), representing a total loss of approximately 37 pounds (17 kg), or 14.4% of her starting body weight. Her BMI declined to 31.5. Functional capacity improved markedly, with her six-minute walk distance increasing from 380 meters to 525 meters. Knee pain, initially rated 6 out of 10, dropped to 2 out of 10, and her weekly physical activity rose from roughly 40 minutes to about 210 minutes.
At the 6-month follow-up, Wanda reported greater confidence exercising independently and maintained most of her weight loss while sustaining an active lifestyle. Several elements contributed to the successful outcome. Early emphasis on strengthening improved joint support and reduced pain, allowing more comfortable participation in aerobic exercise. Gradual cardiovascular progression prevented overexertion and improved adherence, while supervised sessions ensured correct technique and built confidence. Consistent goal tracking and therapist follow-up reinforced accountability and long-term behavior change.
CEUFast, Inc. is committed to furthering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). While reflecting on this course content, CEUFast, Inc. would like you to consider your individual perspective and question your own biases. Remember, implicit bias is a form of bias that impacts our practice as healthcare professionals. Implicit bias occurs when we have automatic prejudices, judgments, and/or a general attitude towards a person or a group of people based on associated stereotypes we have formed over time. These automatic thoughts occur without our conscious knowledge and without our intentional desire to discriminate. The concern with implicit bias is that this can impact our actions and decisions with our workplace leadership, colleagues, and even our patients. While it is our universal goal to treat everyone equally, our implicit biases can influence our interactions, assessments, communication, prioritization, and decision-making concerning patients, which can ultimately adversely impact health outcomes. It is important to keep this in mind in order to intentionally work to self-identify our own risk areas where our implicit biases might influence our behaviors. Together, we can cease perpetuating stereotypes and remind each other to remain mindful to help avoid reacting according to biases that are contrary to our conscious beliefs and values.